Peter & Kim

Peter & Kim

Show options

Global

Lawyers

search
John Bang

John Bang

John P Bang is a senior partner (foreign attorney) at Peter & Kim in Seoul. He was previously a senior partner at Bae, Kim & Lee LLC, where he worked for 23 years in various roles, including as the co-founder and head of the International Arbitration & Litigation Practice. Who's Who Legal notes that John is "the cornerstone of the arbitration space in Korea" and is recognized as "superb counsel" by his peers. He has represented parties in over 250 proceedings under the rules of all major institutions and/or ad hoc arbitrations including the ICC, SIAC, HKIAC, ICSID, LCIA, AAA/ICDR, UNCITRAL, VIAC, SCC, ACICA, CIETAC, KCAB, CAS, CIAC and JCAA. He also acts as arbitrator and is regularly appointed as co-arbitrator or presiding arbitrator by institutions and users. Prior to his work at BKL, John served as a federal law clerk to the Honourable Kathryn C. Ferguson. Currently, he is a member of the SIAC Court of Arbitration, an executive committee member of the Korea Council for International Arbitration and a senior officer of the IBA Litigation Committee. AREA OF EXPERTISE \tArbitration / Litigation \tInvestments & BIT \tTrade law and WTO \tMergers & Acquisitions INDUSTRY SECTORS \tEnergy & Power \tOil & Gas \tEntertainment & Sports \tConstruction & Engineering \tShipping REPRESENTATIVE CASES \tCounsel in a high-value ICC Arbitration seated in Singapore for a Korean construction company concerning the development of a USD 35 billion business district project. \tCounsel in an ICC Arbitration seated in Singapore fora major Korean financial group in an international arbitration in relation to the sale of shares in a major Korean bank related to the Lonestar-ROK treaty arbitration. \tCounsel in a successful, high-profile ICC arbitration involving a dispute among shareholders for control over a major Korean oil refining and marketing company, with the underlying claims valued at over USD 3 billion (or USD 5 billion including counterclaims). The arbitration award won GAR's "Arbitration Win of the Year" in \tCounsel in a high-value LCIA arbitration seated in London, arising from a dispute regarding the procurement, construction and commissioning of the first nuclear power station in the United Arab Emirates. \tCounsel in an ICSID arbitration based on the Korea — Belgium/Luxembourg BIT, involving multi-billion-dollar daims against the Government of Korea. \tCounsel in a consolidated HKIAC arbitration arising from a post-M&A dispute regarding the sale of shares in a major logistics company between two global private equity firms. \tCounsel in a high-value SIAC Arbitration seated in Singapore for a consortium of Asian companies concerning the development and operation of a major power plant. \tCounsel in an ICC Arbitration seated in Singapore for a major Korean airline in a price review dispute based a long-term catering service agreement. \tCounsel in an investment treaty arbitration filed by Swiss-based elevator maker Schindler against the Government of Korea, over its investment in Hyundai Elevator. \tCounsel to a football club in a dispute at the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) against a player's agent. \tCo-arbitrator in a SIAC arbitration seated in Singapore, arising out of an insurance claim under a trade credit insurance policy for the sale of steel. \tCo-arbitrator in a HKIAC arbitration seated in Hong Kong, arising out of an Equity and Purchase Agreement from the automobile component industry.  RANKING \tALB Korea Law Awards: Dispute Resolution Lawyer of the Year (2019) \tMinister of Justice, Republic of Korea: Commendation for service towards development of international arbitration in Korea (2018) \tAsialaw Asia-Pacific Dispute Resolution Awards: Disputes Star of the Year (2016) \tGlobal Arbitration Review: "45 under 45", a list of the world's leading lawyers under 45 (2011) \tChambers Asia: Band 1- leading dispute resolution practitioner in Asia (2008-2020) \tWho's Who Legal - Global Arbitration Review: Leading International Arbitration Practitioner (2007-2020) QUOTES Chambers Asia (2020) remarks that John is respected for "not only the legal knowledge, but also the know-how to change the atmosphere and the relationship with the counterparty." Who's Who Legal (2020) points out that "John Bang is an "excellent team leader" who cornes "highly recommended" by peers and clients alike for his expertise handling disputes under various arbitral rules around the world." Chambers Global (2020) describes John as "very diligent and passionate" while commending him as a "Top advocate."
Ara Cho

Ara Cho

Ara Cho is a partner at Peter & Kim in Seoul. As a Korean qualified lawyer since 2011, Ara has represented clients in numerous international arbitrations under the rules of the ICC, LCIA, SIAC, and KCAB, seated in various jurisdictions and governed by various legal systems including English, Canadian, Japanese and Korean law.  Ara has acted as counsel in cases concerning a range of large-scale international projects including thermal power plants in Middle East, a nuclear power plant in Middle East, a refinery plant in Africa and real estate developments in Korea and Australia, as well as distribution contracts concerning pharmaceutical products and others. Ara has also represented state parties in investment treaty arbitration cases.   Ara actively participates in pro bono programs and routinely helps refugees and immigrants with legal issues.   Ara is native in Korean and fluent in English.  AREAS OF EXPERTISE \tArbitration / Litigation \tKorean Litigation \tInvestment / BITs \tProject Finance \tJoint Ventures / Consortia \tAdministrative /Constitutional Law \tInternational Tax INDUSTRY SECTORS \tConstruction & Engineering \tEnergy & Power \tOil & Gas \tReal Estate REPRESENTATIVE CASES \tRepresented a private equity consortium in an ICC arbitration seated in Seoul arising from a shareholder agreement with respect to put option exercise.   \tRepresented the Government of Korea in an investment treaty arbitration based on the Korea-Iran BIT.  \tRepresented a Korean construction company in an ICC arbitration seated in London arising from a substation construction project in Middle East.  \tProvided advice on various forms of overseas construction contracts including EPC contracts, supply sub-contracts, and construction management contracts.  \tRepresented a Korean construction company in a SIAC arbitration arising from a consortium agreement with respect to a power plant project in the Middle East.  \tRepresented a global real estate developer in an ICC arbitration seated in Korea, arising from a large real estate development project in Korea, and involving issues related to the financing of the project.  \tRepresented a Korean company in an LCIA arbitration regarding a nuclear power plant project in the Middle East.  \tRepresented Korean construction companies in ICC arbitrations regarding an overseas power plant and refinery plant construction project in the Middle East and Africa  \tRepresented a Korean gas company in an LCIA arbitration regarding a gas development project in the Middle East.  \tRepresented a Korean construction company in a KCAB arbitration regarding a construction project in Australia  \tRepresented the Government of Korea in an ICSID arbitration based on the Korea-Belgium/Luxembourg BIT.  \tRepresented a U.S. company before the Korean court for issues relating to a letter of credit.  \tActed as counsel for several hospitals in litigation claiming the invalidity of an insurance fee system against the Ministry of Health and Welfare.  \tProvided advice regarding the revision of domestic laws and regulations in accordance with the Korea-US FTA Technical Barriers to Trade.  \tRepresented and advised many other companies on various international arbitration and administrative litigation proceedings.  \tArbitrator in a KCAB arbitration seated in Seoul, between a Korean manufacturer and US distributor arising from a distributorship agreement.   
Konstantin Christie

Konstantin Christie

Konstantin Christie is a US-qualified lawyer, who specializes in complex international commercial disputes and arbitration under international treaties. He has acted in more than 45 arbitrations, stemming from a variety of industries, including oil, gas and electricity, (with a particular emphasis on long-term supply agreements), as well as cases arising from the commodities trading, extraction of natural resources and joint ventures. Based in Europe for many years, Konstantin often deals with cases under Swiss and other civil laws. In addition, Konstantin regularly works with damages experts and clients in order to evaluate the financial compensation and potential viability of claims, arising out of a treaty or contract. He often represents clients from the CIS region and the Middle East and has significant experience with arbitrations in the Asia-Pacific region, seated in Singapore, Seoul and Tokyo. Konstantin Christie also served as tribunal secretary in a number of “bet the company” arbitrations under the rules of most leading arbitral institutions (including ICC, SCAI, LCIA, SIAC, ICSID and UNCITRAL) and brings this experience to his appointments and counsel cases. AREAS OF EXPERTISE \tArbitration \tJoint-Ventures / Consortia \tInvestments & BIT \tMergers & Acquisitions \tPublic International Law \tShareholder Agreements INDUSTRY SECTORS \tAutomotive & Heavy Industry \tCommodities Trading \tMedia, Art & Entertainment \tMining & Metals \tOil & Gas REPRESENTATIVE CASES \tCounsel in an ad hoc arbitration between a state-owned enterprise and a sovereign state, involving aspects of public international law, with an amount in dispute of USD several billion. \tCounsel in an ICSID arbitration against an Asian State on behalf of an investor from South East Asia. \tLead counsel in an ICC arbitration for a major mining and metallurgy consortium with more than USD 500 million in dispute, under Swiss law. \tCounsel in an ad hoc arbitration between a state-owned enterprise and a sovereign state, with an amount in dispute of over USD 150 million. \tCounsel in an ad hoc investment arbitration between a state-owned enterprise and a sovereign state, with an amount in dispute of USD 200 million. \tRepresenting two respondents from the CIS region in arbitrations in the automotive and agricultural sector, under the ICC and Swiss Rules, subject to Swiss and French law respectively and 4 million EUR and 60 million EUR in amounts in dispute. \tLead associate in an investment treaty arbitration, US Steel Global Holdings I v. Republic of Slovakia, which ended in favourable settlement for the client, with more than USD 350 million in dispute. \tCounsel to a major energy conglomerate in its price adjustment disputes under long-term supply agreements subject to ICC Rules, under Italian and Swiss law. \tRepresenting a German client in an ad hoc investment arbitration against a CEE government concerning an expropriation of an enterprise. \tSecretary to the Arbitral Tribunal in an ICC arbitration, seated in Singapore, governed by Thai law, arising out of a dispute in the renewable energy sector (more than USD1 billon in dispute). \tSecretary to the Arbitral Tribunal in an ICC arbitration, seated in Geneva, under Bulgarian substantive law, arising out of nuclear power plant construction (more than USD 1.5 billion in dispute). RANKING \t2017-2021 Arbitration: Future Leaders Who’s Who \t2020 – Legal500 Arbitration EMEA Switzerland, Next Generation Partners QUOTES WWL (Future leaders of Arbitration, 2021) says that Konstantin is “outstanding at CIS arbitrations". WWL (Future leaders of Arbitration, 2020) says: Konstantin Christie comes highly recommended as a "smart young lawyer" who "defends his clients in an elegant and effective way". Legal 500, 2020 edition says: Extremely hard-working and smart. He has brilliant legal skills and abilities, and delivers outstanding results. > WWL (Future leaders of Arbitration, 2018) says: Konstantin Christie boasts outstanding expertise in commercial and investment disputes and is held in particularly high esteem for his work in the energy sector.    
Arie Eernisse

Arie Eernisse

Arie Eernisse FCIArb is a senior foreign attorney at Peter & Kim and has been practicing international arbitration in Asia for the past decade. He has acted as counsel in more than 50 commercial and investment arbitration matters governed by the rules of various arbitral institutions, such as the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), American Arbitration Association (AAA) – International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR), Korean Commercial Arbitration Board (KCAB), Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC), Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) and London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA). The subject matter of his cases spans a diverse array of industry sectors and topics, including construction, distribution agreements, energy, finance, insurance, intellectual property, maritime, mergers & acquisitions, military procurement, pharmaceutical, product liability sale of goods, and services, amongst others. Arie is “a distinguished practitioner with a wealth of experience in international arbitration proceedings, known for his ‘clarity and precision in communication‘ and ‘diligence and dedication to his clients’” (Who’s Who Legal, 2023). He “draws widespread praise for his deep expertise in handling disputes under an array of arbitration rules,” “is extremely responsive and generous with his time,” “extremely hard-working and consistently brings excellent results,” “is a supportive leader throughout and has an exceptional work ethic” and “brings a lot of passion and dedication into his work.” (Lexology Index, 2024-25). Arie also acts regularly as an arbitrator. He is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators, the Hong Kong Institute of Arbitrators and the Singapore Institute of Arbitrators. Further, he is listed on the KCAB INTERNATIONAL Panel of Arbitrators, the HKIAC List of Arbitrators, SIAC List of Arbitrators, the ICDR International Panel of Arbitrators, the Dubai International Arbitration Centre (DIAC) List of Arbitrators, the Japan Commercial Arbitration Associate (JCAA) Arbitrators Panel and the Thailand Arbitration Center (THAC) Panel of Arbitrators. In addition to his counsel and arbitrator work, Arie serves as Co-chair of the AMCHAM Korea Legal Affairs Committee and Events Director of ARIAS Asia. He previously served as Associate Editor of the Kluwer Arbitration Blog, leading its Asia-Pacific coverage and managing a team of ten assistant editors. Prior to joining Peter & Kim, Arie practiced international arbitration at another law firm in Korea and, before that, served as a law clerk to a federal judge at the U.S. Court of International Trade in New York City. At Duke Law School, Arie was a staff editor of the Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law. Representative Cases Construction \tRepresented an environmental and energy company against a Middle East-based subcontractor in a dispute relating to the design of a wastewater treatment facility (English law; ICC arbitration; Singapore seat) \tRepresented a construction conglomerate against a Middle East-based construction company relating to a delay and disruption claim (English law; ICC arbitration; London seat) \tRepresented a quasi-governmental ocean research organization in a dispute against a Swiss deep-sea exploration company regarding liability for delay (Korean law; ICC arbitration; Singapore seat) Distribution Agreements \tAppointed as sole arbitrator for a distributorship agreement dispute between a Korean medical supply manufacturer and a Brazilian distributor (Korean law; KCAB arbitration; Seoul seat) \tRepresented a US apparel designer in a dispute involving minimum purchase amounts in an exclusive distribution agreement with a Korean distributor (CISG and California law; ICC; Seoul seat) \tRepresented a Kuwaiti cosmetics distributor in a contract termination dispute against a Korean cosmetics company (Korean and Kuwaiti law; KCAB arbitration; Seoul seat) \tRepresented a Korean home goods entrepreneur in defense of contractual claims brought by a U.S. contractual counterpart (Korean law; KCAB arbitration; Seoul seat) Finance \tRepresented an investment company against a life insurer in a shareholder dispute involving the determination of a share price for a put option (Korean law; ICC arbitration; Seoul seat) \tRepresented a chemical and auto parts manufacturer in a dispute against a finance company based in Saudi Arabia in a dispute relating to payment of amounts allegedly due under a financial agreement (English law; LCIA arbitration; London seat) \tRepresented a Malaysian car dealership in defense of claims brought by a Korean conglomerate regarding liability under credit facility agreements (Korean law; two KCAB arbitrations; Seoul seat) Insurance \tRepresented a leading Asian reinsurer in a dispute against another Asian reinsurer involving claims of knowing misrepresentations and omissions in the retrocession of insurance policies (Thai law; ad hoc arbitration administered by SIAC, with hearing held at THAC; Bangkok seat) \tRepresented a leading Korean private equity fund in a post-M&A dispute against a European insurance major relating to life insurance liabilities (Korean law; ICC arbitration; Hong Kong seat) (co-counsel) Intellectual Property \tRepresented a Korean video game company in separate disputes against Chinese companies regarding intellectual property infringement and other issues (Korean law or Singapore law; three ICC or SIAC arbitrations; Singapore seat) (co-counsel) \tRepresented a Norwegian music technology company in a dispute with a Korean IT company over breach of contract (California law; ICDR arbitration; Norway seat) International Litigation \tRepresented Korean conglomerates and other clients in litigations throughout the world; represent foreign (non-Korean) clients in litigation matters in Korea Investor-State Arbitration \tRepresented a Korean electric power generation public utility in an investment treaty dispute against the Government of India relating to the power plant in which it invested (international law; UNCITRAL arbitration; Singapore seat) \tRepresented investors in the first two investor-state treaty disputes involving Korea (international law; ICSID arbitration; Washington, DC seat) (co-counsel) Maritime \tRepresented a shipbuilder in transnational litigation relating to maritime casualty in the United States (US admiralty law; US federal court litigation) (co-counsel) \tRepresented a conglomerate in transnational litigation relating to maritime casualty in Nigeria (Nigerian law; Nigerian court litigation) (co-counsel) Mergers & Acquisitions \tRepresented a Korean investment firm with a focus on technology and digital media venture to defend against claims of breach of information delivery rights and inspection rights in connection with a share transfer plan (Korean law; ICC; Seoul seat) \tRepresented a U.S. dealmaker in a dispute over a Hong Kong entity’s failure to pay a success fee following the closing of an M&A deal (Korean law; KCAB arbitration; Seoul seat) \tRepresented a U.S. individual in a post-divestiture payment dispute (Korean law; KCAB arbitration; Seoul seat) \tRepresented a Mauritian investor against a Korean clothing company regarding in a dispute relating to a share purchase agreement (Korean law; SIAC arbitration; Singapore seat) Military Procurement and National Defense \tRepresented an Iraqi subcontractor against a Korean entity in a dispute relating to tax settlement and performance of a consulting agreement (Korean law; ICC arbitration; Seoul seat) \tRepresented a European defense industry client in aircraft procurement dispute against governmental entity (Korean law; KCAB arbitration; Seoul seat) \tRepresented a Korean government agency against a major European manufacturer in a naval procurement dispute involving an allegedly defective motor (Korean law; ICC arbitration; Seoul seat) Nuclear Power / Renewable Energy \tRepresented a US nuclear power company against its Korean counterparts in a dispute relating to the interpretation of a licensing agreement concerning nuclear power plant technology (Korean law; KCAB arbitration; Seoul seat) \tRepresented a state-owned nuclear energy company in defense of claims relating to payment for replacement parts (Korean law; two KCAB arbitrations; Seoul seat) \tRepresented a wind-power generation system manufacturer in dispute against a major European component manufacturer (Swiss law; ICC arbitration; Seoul seat) \tRepresented a Korean photovoltaic inverter manufacturer in a dispute against a Thai company relating to liability for destruction of goods (Korean law; KCAB arbitration; Seoul seat) Pharmaceutial \tRepresented a biopharmaceutical company against a Chinese developer relating to whether commercially reasonable efforts were made (New York law; ICC Arbitration; New York seat) Product Liability \tRepresented a leading Korean metals manufacturer in defense of a product liability and indemnity claim brought by a U.S. company (CISG and Michigan law; ICC arbitration; Geneva seat) Sale of Goods \tRepresented a supplier of secondary battery production equipment in a dispute related to the provision of such equipment to a US secondary battery manufacturer (New York law; AAA-ICDR arbitration; New York seat) \tRepresented a manufacturer of polysilicon used for semiconductors and solar cells in a payment dispute against a Chinese company relating to a consignment agreement (Hong Kong law; HKIAC arbitration; Hong Kong seat) \tRepresented an importer/exporter of vehicles and vehicle parts in a dispute against a North Macedonian company (Korean law; ICC arbitration; Seoul seat) Services \tAppointed as co-arbitrator for a services agreement dispute between a Singaporean marketing consultant and a Korean medical business (Korean law; KCAB arbitration; Singapore seat) \tRepresented a government agency against two U.S. companies in a dispute relating to breach of a retainer agreement (Korean law; KCAB arbitration; Seoul seat) \tRepresented a Korean real estate investment entity in a dispute over hotel management (Korean law; KCAB arbitration; Seoul seat)
Mino Han

Mino Han

Mino Han has acted as counsel in various international arbitrations conducted under the auspices of the ICC, SIAC, HKIAC, KCAB or JCAA. Mino specializes in construction and engineering disputes. The relevant projects underlying the disputes were each based in the Middle East, Asia, Eastern Europe, Africa or Latin America and concerned the design and construction of combined cycle power plants, solar power production facilities, refineries, high-rise buildings, convention centres and infrastructure facilities.    Mino has also vast experience in representing contractors in Korean court or KCAB domestic arbitration proceedings. He also regularly advises clients on issuing or defending claims arising out of standard form contracts including the FIDIC Suite of Contracts.   Mino majored in law at Seoul National University (LL.B., 2006), after which he passed the Korean Bar Exam in 2006 and qualified as Korean lawyer in 2009. He also received a Master of Laws degree in international arbitration law from Seoul National University in 2012 and a Master of Science degree for Construction Law and Dispute Resolution at King’s College London in 2018. Mino’s MSc dissertation entitled “The meaning and scope of ‘consequential loss’ exclusion clauses – A comparative law analysis between English law and Korean law” was awarded with a distinction grade. In July 2019, Mino was admitted to the roll of solicitors in England and Wales.    Mino has been recognized by Who’s Who Legal as Global Elite Thought Leader in Arbitration (Under 45 – Partners). Mino serves as member of the KCAB Next Steering Committee, and is a DIS (German Arbitration Institute) Council Member. Mino has been the ICC YAAF Regional Representative for Korea (2021-2025 term).   Mino is also sitting as arbitrator, and has served as arbitrator in ICC, DIS, KCAB arbitrations.   Mino is native in Korean and German and is also fluent in English.   AREAS OF EXPERTISE \tArbitration / Litigation \tProject Finance \tKorean Litigation \tInternational Projec \tContracting \tJoint Ventures / Consortia \tShareholder Disputes INDUSTRY SECTORS \tConstruction & Engineering \tShipbuilding \tEnergy & Power \tOil & Gas \tReal Estate \tAviation REPRESENTATIVE CASES Construction & Engineering Related Cases \tLead counsel for a Korean contractor in an ICC dispute regarding a desalination plant project in the UAE. ICC, Dubai. The outcome was successful.   \tCo-lead counsel for a Korean shipyard concerning a dispute on a power plant project in Saudi Arabia. ICC, London. The outcome was successful.    \tLead counsel for a Korean steel supplier in an ad hoc arbitration arising from a steel supply contract for a bridge construction project in Canada. The outcome was successful.   \tSuccessfully represented a Korean construction company in an ICC arbitration concerning a project for the construction of a combined cycle power plant in Jordan.   \tRepresented a major Korean construction company in an ICC arbitration arising from a project regarding the construction of a low sulphur diesel refinery in Trinidad and Tobago. The matter settled.  \tSuccessfully represented a Korean power company in an ICC arbitration against the O&M service provider of a solar power production facility in Bulgaria.  \tSuccessfully represented a Korean steel supplier in a SIAC arbitration arising from a steel supply contract in connection with a major construction project in Australia.   \tSuccessfully represented a major Korean construction company in a SIAC arbitration arising from a project for the construction of a high-rise building in Mongolia.   \tRepresented a major Korean construction company in a KCAB arbitration against a major German plant equipment supplier. The matter settled.  \tActed as counsel for many Korean construction companies in KCAB domestic arbitrations or domestic litigation   \tProvided legal advice to many Korean contractors for large scale overseas projects.   Other Representative Cases \t \tActing as counsel for a Korean investment fund in a US court litigation arising from a transaction involving the acquisition of 15 luxury hotels in the US net worth USD 5.8 billion.   \tActing as counsel for the Korean government in an investor state dispute.   \tRepresented Korean shareholders of a major retail company in Korea in a JCAA dispute against a minority shareholder of that company.   
Kevin Kim

Kevin Kim

Kap-You (Kevin) Kim is a senior partner at Peter & Kim in Seoul. He was previously a senior partner at Bae, Kim & Lee LLC, where he worked for the past three decades in various roles, including as the co-founder and head of the International Arbitration Practice and the head of the Domestic and International Disputes Group. Over the past 30 years, Kevin has acted as counsel, presiding arbitrator, co-arbitrator or sole arbitrator in more than 300 cases of international arbitrations under various arbitration rules. Presently, he is involved in several investment and commercial arbitrations. Among other positions that he holds, Kevin is an Advisory Board Member of the International Council for Commercial Arbitration (ICCA), and the Chairman of the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board's (KCAB) International Arbitration Committee. In the past, Kevin has served as the Vice President of the ICC International Court of Arbitration (2014 — 2021), Secretary General of ICCA (2010 — 2014), member of the LCIA Court (2007 — 2012) and Vice Chair of the IBA Arbitration Committee (2008 — 2010). AREAS OF EXPERTISE \tArbitration / Litigation \tInvestments & BITs \tTrade law and WTO \tProject Financing \tMergers & Acquisitions \tDistribution / Agency \tJoint Ventures / Consortia INDUSTRY SECTORS \tEnergy & Power \tOil & Gas \tPharmaceutical & Biotech \tAutomotive & Heavy Industry \tConstruction & Engineering \tShipping \tShipbuilding \tInsurance \tReal Estate REPRESENTATIVE CASES \tCounsel in an ICC arbitration seated in Korea, involving a dispute arising from a large real estate development project in Korea and its financing, securing a win on ail claims made against a Korean global real estate developer in the aggregate amount of over USD 2 billion. \tCounsel in a successful, high-profile ICC arbitration involving a dispute among shareholders for control over a major Korean oil refining and marketing company, with the underlying claims valued at over USD 3 billion (or USD 5 billion including counterclaims). The arbitration award won GAR's "Arbitration Win of the Year" in 2011. \tCounsel in an ICSID arbitration under the Korea-Belgium/Luxembourg BIT, involving a claim against the Government of Korea and securing a favourable award in the aggregate amount of over USD 5 billion. \tCounsel in an ICC arbitration involving a dispute arising from the repair works of natural gas marine plants in Claims were made against a Korean contractor in the aggregate amount of over USD 8 billion. \tCounsel in a successful high-value LCIA arbitration seated in London, involving a dispute arising from the procurement, construction, and commissioning of the first nuclear power station in the United Arab Emirates. \tCounsel in an ICC arbitration involving claims by a multinational private equity firm against a Korean bank in the amount of over USD 1.2 billion and securing a favourable award for our client. \tCounsel for a Korean investment fund in a US court litigation arising from a transaction involving the acquisition of 15 luxury hotels in the US net worth USD 5.8 billion. \tPresiding arbitrator of an ICSID ad-hoc annulment committee in relation to an investment arbitration award regarding Spain's renewable energy policy. \tPresiding arbitrator in an ad-hoc arbitration conducted under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules 1976, relating to an infrastructure operating contract between a state-entity of the Philippines and a private party. RANKING \tWho's Who Legal (WWL): Global Elite Thought Leaders 2021; Thought Leaders Arbitration 2022; Thought Leaders Construction 2022 \tGlobal Arbitration Review: Leading Practicing Arbitration Expert in Korea (2006-2020) \tChambers: Star Individuals in Dispute Resolution—South Korea (2010 — 2022) \tThe Legal 500 Asia-Pacific: Leading Individuals in International Arbitration Band 1 (2010-2019) \tChambers Asia-Pacific Awards: Outstanding Contribution Award (2013) \tAsialaw: Disputes Star of the Year (2015) \tALB Korea Law Awards: Dispute Resolution Lawyer of the Year (2020) QUOTES Who's Who Legal (2020) says: "Kap-You (Kevin) Kim 'is a key figure in the Korean arbitration market' who has built 'a strong network of arbitrators and practitioners' and is widely considered 'a statesman in the market'." Chambers (2019) says: "Both a leading practitioner domestically and 'highly regarded international ly', 'widely acknowledged as a pioneer in international arbitration in Korea and a very highly regarded individual'." Chambers Asia (2006­-2019) also reports: "One of the most respected figures in the Asian arbitration."  
SeungMin Lee

SeungMin Lee

SeungMin Lee is a partner at Peter & Kim. Ms Lee has represented and provided advocacy for major Korean and International clients in arbitration cases under various institutional rules including that of the ICC, KCAB, SIAC, HKIAC, LCIA and UNCITRAL. Ms Lee is dual-qualified as Korean lawyer and solicitor of England and Wales. She has previously served as the South Korean national representative of the IBA young lawyers’ committee, and has served as regional representative for Korea to the LCIA's Young International Arbitration Group. Ms Lee currently serves as director of international affairs at the Seoul Bar Association; is member of KCAB Next; regional ambassador for Korea to HKIAC's HK45; member of the SIAC Users Council for the South Korea national committee; member of the panel of arbitrators for the Asian International Arbitration Centre; and as a specialist mediator at the Singapore International Mediation Centre. Ms Lee worked as a registered foreign lawyer at Oon & Bazul LLP in Singapore in 2016 and as counsel to the LCIA Secretariat in 2010. A graduate of Seoul National University and member of the Korean bar, Ms Lee completed an LL.M. at the National University of Singapore in 2016. AREAS OF EXPERTISE \tArbitration / Litigation \tInternational Transactions INDUSTRY SECTORS \tIntellectual Property \tMergers & Acquisition \tInvestments & BITs \tCommercial disputes \tEnergy and Power disputes \tReal Estate \tJoint Ventures REPRESENTATIVE CASES \tCounsel in two ICC arbitrations seated in Singapore between a Korean online game company and Chinese companies (2017-2020). \tCounsel in a SIAC arbitration seated in Singapore between a Korean online game company and Chinese companies (2017-2020). \tCounsel in an ICSID case, Lone Star Funds vs. Republic of Korea (2013-2017), and an ICC case, seated in Singapore between an investment company and a Korean bank (2013-2015). \tCounsel in an ICC case, seated in Singapore, between a research organization and an ocean-floor drilling company (2014-2015), an UNICITRAL case seated in Seoul. \tCounsel in a dispute between a UK based software company and a Korean broadcast company (2011-2014). \tCounsel in an ICC case seated in Seoul between a Korean construction company and a vendor of a certain type of steam scrubber technology (2013-2014). \tCounsel in a SIAC case seated in Singapore between a Korean shipbuilding company and a Singaporean company (2013-2014). \tCounsel in an HKIAC case seated in Hong Kong between a Chinese company producing mono-silicon ingots and a Korean company producing mono-silicon ingot growers (2012-2014). \tCounsel in an ICC case seated in Seoul between a multi-national lock manufacturer and a Korean investor (2012-2013). \tCounsel in an ICC case seated in Paris between a Korean conglomerate and a petroleum company (2008-2011). \tCounsel in an ICC case seated in Singapore between a Korean confectionary company and a foreign investor (2008-2010). RANKING \tChambers Asia Pacific 2016 to 2019, selected as a ranked lawyer in the jurisdiction of Korea (International Arbitration, 2016 to 2019) \tRecognized as “future leader under 45-Partners” by Who’s Who Legal (2018-2019) QUOTES WWL (Future leaders of Arbitration, 2019) says: The "outstanding" SeungMin Lee is a "rising star in arbitration" and sources state that she "works incredibly hard and provides great law analysis".  
James Morrison

James Morrison

James (Jim) Morrison is a specialist in international arbitration, acting as arbitrator and counsel, as well as having extensive experience working in multiple arbitral institutions. Jim has worked at leading international law firms, representing leading companies in a wide variety of complex high-stakes commercial and investor-state disputes, including in the fields of construction, infrastructure, energy and resources, sports, M&A, intellectual property, shipbuilding and joint ventures. Jim is formerly Counsel at the ICC International Court of Arbitration in Paris and Counsel (Acting Secretary General) at the Australian Centre for International Commercial Arbitration in Sydney where he managed teams of lawyers responsible for the conduct of hundreds of international arbitrations taking place all over the world (but particularly in Asia). He holds a Master’s Degree in International Commercial Arbitration Law from the University of Stockholm. Jim was listed in the GAR 45 Under 45 in 2023 and has been regularly recognised in the WWL: Arbitration and Thought Leaders – Arbitration. He has participated in working groups to revise various institutional and ad hoc arbitration rules, including as chair of the committee revising the ACICA Rules. He regularly speaks and lectures at arbitration conferences and universities. Jim is a former Co-Chair of Young ICCA, a co-author of the first English language text book on Korean arbitration law and regularly publishes in international dispute resolution. AREAS OF EXPERTISE \tArbitration / Litigation \tPrivate International Law \tInvestment Law INDUSTRY SECTORS \tConstruction & Engineering \tInfrastructure \tEnergy & Resources \tM&A \tIntellectual Property \tShipbuilding \tJoint Ventures REPRESENTATIVE CASES \tRepresented a major steel company in a SIAC Singapore seated arbitration under NSW law against liquidated damages and defects claims in the design and supply of steel fora major infrastructure project in Australia. \tRepresented a major mining and metallurgy consortium in an ICC arbitration with more than USD 500 million in dispute, under Swiss law, concerning the engineering and construction of a state of the art metallurgical facility. \tRepresented a large Korean construction company in an ICC Singapore seated arbitration against a US developer concerning a mega-development project in Korea. \tRepresented a large Korean construction company in an ICC London seated arbitration against Turkish sub-contractor concerning design and construction of a power plant in Iraq under Iraqi law. \tRepresented the principal of one of the most significant LNG projects in the world concerning a multi-billion dollar ICC arbitration seated in Singapore. \tRepresented an international consortium of oil producers in a SIAC arbitration in Singapore against a contractor concerning change orders, defects and delays in the construction of an FSO facility in Vietnam. \tRepresented a consortium of insurers in a complex high-value dispute concerning defective and delayed works in the construction of a water desalination plant in Australia. \tRepresented one of the world’s leading hotel operators in a joint venture dispute concerning hotel development in India – ICC arbitration seated in Singapore. \tRepresented a large steel manufacturer in an ICC arbitration in London concerning the alleged wrongful termination of an iron slab off-take agreement. \tRepresented a well-known shipbuilding business in an arbitration before the LMAA in London concerning the construction of ship hulls. \tRepresented a leading construction company in a number of related ICC London and Zurich seated arbitrations for delays and defects in power plant and water treatment projects in the Middle East. \tRepresented a major welding products supplier in an ICC arbitration seated in Zurich in a dispute concerning the termination of a joint venture agreement. \tRepresented a leading engineering and construction firm in an ad hoc arbitration in London concerning delays and defects in the construction of an offshore oil platform. \tRepresented an Australian mining company in a high value and complex ad hoc arbitration under WA law concerning rights to mining tenements RANKING \tLexology Index: Arbitration (2025) \tGAR 45 Under 45 (2023) \tWho’s Who Legal (WWL): Thought Leaders Arbitration \tWWL: Arbitration and National Leader: Australia – Arbitration QUOTES WWL (Arbitration, 2021) says: “James Morrison is applauded by peers for his ‘extensive knowledge’ of international arbitration as well as his ‘sharp mind’ and ‘pragmatic and strategic’ approach”
Tom Moxham

Tom Moxham

Tom Moxham was admitted to the bar in 1987 and has had decades of experience as an attorney practicing in Australia, Europe and Asia. He has specialist experience working in both arbitral institutions and leading firms in international arbitration. He has acted as counsel in international arbitrations under various rules, including ICC, ICSID, KCAB, CAS, SCC and SIAC. He was the first international counsel appointed to the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board. In parallel with his legal practice, he has extensive experience in agriculture and agribusiness, including dispute resolution, financing, production, government policy and environmental management. AREAS OF EXPERTISE \tArbitration \tCommercial Contracts \tJoint Ventures / Consortia \tSport Law \tWater & Environment INDUSTRY SECTORS \tConstruction & Engineering \tEnergy & Power \tAgribusiness REPRESENTATIVE CASES \tRepresenting a European investment fund in a SIAC Singapore seated arbitration involving an M&A deal in Thailand, including emergency arbitration proceedings; \tRepresenting the International Olympic Committee in a CAS arbitration involving the banning of athletes competing at the 2006 Turin Olympic Games for various doping activities; \tRepresenting the constructor in relation to delays and defects in construction of a nuclear power plant (ICC Rules); \tRepresenting several companies involving the expropriation of international utility investments by Argentina (ICSID Rules); \tRepresenting an Australian company involved in a share sale dispute for the controlling interest of a listed Australian company in the Supreme Court of NSW, Australia; \tNegotiation and settlement of a long-running insurance licensing and regulation dispute on behalf of a leading not-for-profit association against various Australian governmental authorities.
Flavio Peter

Flavio Peter

Flavio Peter is a partner with Peter & Kim Ltd in Geneva and Zurich specializing in international and domestic arbitration and related litigation proceedings, including enforcement and attachment proceedings before local courts and setting aside proceedings before the Swiss Federal Supreme Court. Flavio primarily acts as party representative in disputes arising under construction contracts, international sales contracts, disputes concerning long term gas supply contracts, but also agency and distribution agreements, joint venture contracts, and post-M&A disputes. Flavio regularly also sits as chairman, sole arbitrator or co-arbitrator and has gained vast experience as administrative secretary to arbitral tribunals in several international and domestic arbitration proceedings (conducted in accordance with the ICC Arbitration and ADR Rules, Swiss Rules, UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, VIAC Rules, DIS Rules as well as in ad hoc proceedings). During his professional experience Flavio has acted in more than 45 arbitrations under a variety of substantive laws, including in particular the laws of Switzerland, Germany, Austria, Italy, Turkey, Sweden, the US (e.g. Delaware and California) or England and Wales, and of course the CISG. Flavio is a member of the Swiss Arbitration Marketing Committee and co-chair of ASAbelow40. He holds a teaching assignment with the University of Zurich (for international arbitration and CISG) and is a Fellow of the CIArb. AREAS OF EXPERTISE \tArbitration \tDistribution / Agency \tInternational Sales \tConstruction \tMergers & Acquisitions \tEnforcement / Attachments \tCommercial Litigation INDUSTRY SECTORS \tAviation \tConstruction & Engineering \tEnergy \tOil & Gas \tPharmaceutical & Biotech \tTransportation REPRESENTATIVE CASES \tCounsel in a USD > 250 million dispute representing a large Turkish construction firm in a construction related JV dispute under the ICC Rules. \tCounsel in a > USD 500 million dispute representing a mining conglomerate in an ICC arbitration concerning the building of a smelting facility. \tLead counsel in a CHF 145 million arbitration under the Swiss Rules concerning sale and purchase of securities (under Liechtenstein/Austrian Law). \tLead counsel in setting aside proceedings before the Swiss Federal Supreme Court successfully defending an Award rendered under the Swiss Rules, resulting in a seminal decision (BGE 147 III 379) on the question whether, after one of the initial arbitrators resigned and had to be replaced, an arbitral tribunal in its new formation has to repeat a hearing (and other important procedural steps). RANKING \tWho’s Who Legal (WWL): Global Leader in 2022/2023; Future Leader (non-partners section) (2017-2021) and one of the "Most Highly Recommended" practitioners (non-partners section, 2021) \tRanked in the Legal 500 under Dispute Resolution: Arbitration, Switzerland QUOTES Who's Who Legal (WWL): Global Leader-Arbitration 2022 / 2023: "Flavio is very experienced as both tribunal member and counsel in disputes” “He is diligent and focused in his approach” "Flavio is an excellent arbitration lawyer, who already has manifold experience in the field despite his young age" Who's Who Legal (WWL): Switzerland-Arbitration 2023: "the next big arbitration lawyer in Switzerland"
Wolfgang Peter

Wolfgang Peter

Wolfgang Peter is recognized by clients and his peers as one of the most in-demand counsels and arbitrators in the world, having been engaged in over 270 arbitrations as counsel and arbitrator. Dr. Peter is particularly active in cases involving complex issues of valuations, including post-M&A disputes, joint ventures and projects stemming from the heavy industry. He has decades of expertise in cases involving gas & oil contracts, including upstream and downstream projects, as well as price reviews under long-term gas supply agreements. Dr. Peter regularly advises third-party funding companies in evaluating the merits of the Claimant(s)’ cases, especially with regard to the damages. An active speaker and contributor to the arbitration community at large, he is a member of the LCIA Board of Directors and of the ASA Board. Prior to starting his independent arbitration practice, he headed the arbitration group of Python & Peter, one of the largest Swiss firms, which he also co-founded. Before engaging in arbitration practice full time, Dr. Peter led a successful M&A and corporate practice for 14 years, completing over 40 transactions and IPOs, including such well-known brands and companies as Gucci, Chaumet, Breguet, Tag Heuer, Ebel and Leica. While practicing M&A, he managed two luxury watch-making companies, for 12 years. AREAS OF EXPERTISE \tArbitration / Litigation \tCorporate Law \tDistribution / Agency \tJoint Ventures / Consortia \tInvestments & BITs \tMergers & Acquisitions INDUSTRY SECTORS \tAutomotive & Heavy Industry \tConstruction & Engineering \tElectricity Supply \tFashion & Luxury Goods \tOil & Gas \tPharmaceutical & Biotech REPRESENTATIVE CASES \tLead counsel in an ad hoc arbitration between a state-owned enterprise and a sovereign state, involving aspects of public international law, with an amount in dispute of USD several billion. \tLead counsel in a case involving two state-owned entities in a highly complex ad hoc arbitration involving aspects of public international law stemming from oil production and delivery agreements, securing an award of more than a billion USD for our clients. \tCo-counsel in two PCA arbitrations involving a state-owned entity and private companies in a dispute concerning gas deliveries, with more than 15 billion USD in dispute. \tCounsel to a major energy conglomerate in its price adjustment disputes against another European major relating to long-term gas supply agreements subject to ICC Rules. \tCo-counsel in in an arbitration under UNCITRAL Rules arising out of a dispute between a Canadian company and two mainland Chinese companies in relation to an unconventional gas project in China. \tLead counsel in an ICC arbitration for a major mining and metallurgy consortium with more than USD 500 million in dispute, under Swiss law. \tChairman of an Arbitral Tribunal in an ICC arbitration arising out of nuclear power plant construction (more than USD 1.5 billion in dispute). \tChairman of the Arbitral Tribunal in the Vivendi v Elektrim arbitration, an important decision on the interrelation between arbitral proceedings and bankruptcy, confirmed by two instances of the English courts. \tCo-counsel in an ICC arbitration concerning the break-up of Arthur Andersen, resulting in a seminal decision of the Swiss Supreme Court on the joinder of the arbitration agreements. RANKING \tWho’s Who Legal (WWL): Thought Leaders 2019-2020; Arbitration Switzerland 2010-2020, National Leader \tWho’s Who Legal (WWL): Energy, Construction 2019-2020 Global Leader \tChambers Global and Europe: Most in Demand Arbitrators and Counsel (2016-2020) QUOTES Wolfgang Peter is one of Europe's key names when it comes to arbitration matters. His expertise lies in acting as counsel and arbitrator in post-M&A, joint venture and contractual disputes. WWL THOUGHT LEADERS, 2020 Wolfgang Peter comes recommended for his strength in arbitration related to the oil and gas sector and in post-M&A disputes. Based in Geneva, he is often selected to serve as arbitrator on both commercial and investment treaty cases. Sources praise his good understanding of the commercial and economic stakes in cases, with one praising his" commercial mind – he can see what things mean economically, so I wouldn't hesitate to appoint him for disputes with complex commercial damages issues." Chambers Europe, 2020 Wolfgang Peter is one of the most experienced and smart lawyers in the area of international arbitration. He has over 30 years of experience and is capable of handling the most complex matters with an exceptional level of proficiency. Legal500, 2020  
Alexis Schoeb

Alexis Schoeb

Alexis is a Swiss-qualified attorney-at-law, member of the Geneva Bar, with considerable experience as both arbitrator and counsel in complex commercial, investment and sport proceedings with high financial and media implications.  Over the last 20 years, he has been advising and representing individuals, companies and international organisations in international commercial, investment and sport disputes.  Alexis has acted as lead or co-counsel in more than 70 commercial and sports-related proceedings, before the main commercial arbitral institutions, as well as before the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS).  In particular, he has advised and represented high profile athletes, agents as well as some of Europe’s biggest football clubs. Alexis has also successfully represented clients before the Swiss Federal Tribunal on numerous occasions.  He is a recognised arbitrator, appointed to the list of arbitrators of several arbitration institutions and is a member of the UK Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (FCIArb) and Singapore Institute of Arbitrators (FSIArb).  Over the past 10 years, Alexis has been appointed in more than 100 cases as an arbitrator in international commercial or sport disputes involving, among others, construction, agency, distribution, licensing, joint venture and media contracts.  From 2018 to 2024, he has been a member of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). He has also sat as arbitrator in more than 20 proceedings before arbitral tribunals of international sports federations (including UCI, AIBA, FIVB, etc.).  AREAS OF EXPERTISE \tInternational commercial arbitration \tInternational investment arbitration \tInternational sports arbitration INDUSTRY SECTORS \tSports \tMedia & entertainment  \tEnergy & natural resources  \tCommodities trading  \tWeb 3.0, blockchain & cryptocurrencies trading REPRESENTATIVE CASES \tLead counsel in a USD 150 million dispute representing a trader in an ICC arbitration against one of the leading cryptocurrencies’ centralised exchanges.  \tCo-arbitrator in a construction dispute in the United Arab Emirates under the DIAC rules.  \tCo-Counsel for a football agent in a dispute related to agency fees in a >EUR 100 million transfer against an international football player.  \tChairman of an arbitral tribunal in a banking dispute with seat in Switzerland.  \tLead counsel of a large commodity trading company in an arbitration dispute with seat in London.  \tChairman of an arbitral tribunal in a football-related TV Rights dispute of over USD 50 million.  \tLead counsel for a top bicycle brand in a dispute related to major sponsorship agreements.  \tSole arbitrator in a real estate dispute in Monaco with seat in Switzerland.  \tCo-counsel for a majority shareholder in the M&A operations related to the acquisition of the Haute Route Series by the Ironman Group.  \tCo-arbitrator in a post M&A dispute with seat in Switzerland.  \tLead counsel for a service provider against the Olympic Games’ national organising committee in a dispute relation to a license agreement.  \tCo-counsel for FC BARCELONA before CAS in a transfer dispute involving the Brazilian player NEYMAR JR. and his first club SANTOS FC.  \tLead counsel for a national football federation in an appeal filed before the Swiss Federal Tribunal against an arbitral award issued by the Court of Arbitration for Sport.  \tLead counsel for a major broadcasting company in an arbitral dispute related to TV-rights.  \tCo-counsel for a trading company from Democratic Republic of Congo in an appeal filed before the Swiss Federal Tribunal against an arbitral award.  \tLead counsel for a top professional athlete against the International Olympic committee in a dispute regarding his eligibility to participate in the 2016 Rio Olympic Games.  \tCo-counsel for a European football club against the UEFA before CAS in relation to a match-fixing dispute.  \tSole arbitrator in a CAS dispute between a national Olympic committee and an international federation related to the qualification at the 2020 Tokyo Olympic Games.  \tLead-counsel for a professional cycling team in a multimillion-dollar dispute against one of its main sponsors.  \tCo-counsel for a Korean athlete regarding the qualification at the 2024 Paris Olympic Games.  \tLead counsel for an international Australian football player in an anti-doping dispute at both national and CAS levels against a national anti-doping agency.  \tLead counsel for a national football federation in an appeal filed before the Swiss Federal Tribunal against an arbitral award issued by the Court of Arbitration for Sport.  \tCo-counsel for a company in a dispute related to the management and the organisation of ATP (professional tennis) tournaments.  \tCo-counsel for FC BARCELONA in a multi-million dispute related to the purchase of an option right related to a rising-star player.  \tLead counsel for a professional cycling team in the sale of the shares of its managing entity and the takeover of the UCI WorldTour licence.  \tAdvising a major international Sport Federation in a contentious dispute with its constituents.  \tCo-counsel to a football club in a claim against a player’s agent in proceedings before the FIFA Player’s Status Committee and the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) arbitration.  \tCounsel to the president of the Badminton World Federation in organizational disputes between the Badminton World Federation and other regional federations. The dispute related to the governance of the Badminton World Federation.  \tCo-counsel for a Continental Sports Federation in relation to a dispute relate to the organisation of a major multi-sport event.  \tLead counsel for a World and Olympic champion in a doping matter.  \tCo-counsel for a major European football club against the UEFA before CAS in relation to financial fair-play.  \tCo-Counsel for a European football club against the UEFA related to disqualification from the UEFA Champions League.  QUOTES Alexis Schoeb wins plaudits as “a renowned and well-experienced CAS arbitrator”, with peers singling him out as “one of the very best in Switzerland”. WWL THOUGHT LEADERS, Sports & Entertainment 2022 Alexis Schoeb receives applause for his “strong reputation as a go-to sports lawyer”, acting across a broad range of sports matters in arbitration proceedings. WWL THOUGHT LEADERS, Sports & Entertainment 2020
Dongsuk Shin

Dongsuk Shin

Dongsuk Shin is a Foreign Attorney at Peter & Kim in Seoul and is a member of District of Columbia bar. Dongsuk has acted as counsel in international commercial/investment arbitrations under most arbitral institutions and rules, including the ICC, LCIA, HKIAC, UNCITRAL, and SIAC. Prior to joining Peter & Kim in Seoul, Dongsuk worked as a Foreign Registered Lawyer at the Hong Kong office of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP and as a Junior Associate at the Geneva office of Peter & Kim, where he specialized in international arbitration. Dongsuk also worked as an in-house counsel at Kolon Industries, Inc. for about five years, where he performed a wide range of corporate advisory and compliance work and gained extensive experience in international disputes, including cross-border trade secret litigation and related criminal proceedings. Dongsuk is native in Korean and also fluent in English. Representative Cases \tActed for a Korean steel conglomerate against a Kazakhstan state-owned company in an ICC arbitration \tActed in a London seated LCIA arbitration for a Korean construction conglomerate against a Kuwaiti company \tActed for a Swiss company in an investment treaty arbitration against the Republic of Korea administered by the PCA \tActed for one of the largest private equity firms in Asia against the founder of an acquired company in relation to breach of non-compete obligations in an arbitration administered by HKIAC \tActed for a Hong Kong hedge fund in 18 concurrent HKIAC arbitrations against a Korean investment company in relation to a winding-up petition in Jersey \tActed for a major private equity firm in a US$1+ billion ICC arbitration involving a post-M&A dispute, including a breach of warranty claim against a major retail chain \tActed in an ICC arbitration between a Central Asia mining conglomerate and a contractor, with more than US$ 500 million in dispute \tActed in an arbitration under UNCITRAL rules arising out of a dispute between a Canadian company and two mainland Chinese companies in relation to a gas project in China \tActed for a French professional football club, and one of its players in their appeal to the CAS against a decision by the UEFA Control, Ethics and Disciplinary Body
Yunsoo Shin

Yunsoo Shin

Dr Yunsoo Shin is a partner at Peter & Kim and a highly experienced specialist in international commercial disputes. She has been elected as a member of the ICC Court for the 2024–2027 term and has also joined the esteemed Task Force for the IBA Guidelines on Party Representation in International Arbitration. Dr Shin is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators and the Singapore Institute of Arbitrators, a Specialist Mediator at the Singapore International Mediation Centre, and one of the youngest Korean arbitrators active in the ICC International Court of Arbitration. She has acted as an international arbitrator at SIAC,HKIAC, ACICA, and KCAB, and as counsel in various international arbitration cases conducted under the rules of the ICC, SIAC, LCIA, HKIAC, and KCAB. Her expertise covers both the common law and civil law traditions and a broad range of business transactions and commercial disputes involving M&As, general contract law, share purchase and asset purchase agreements, distribution agreements, construction, automobile manufacturing, OEM contracts, and license agreements, among various other subject matters. In particular, she is one of the most experienced young lawyers in Korea who has handled many multi-billion-dollar post-M&A disputes involving Korean chaebols.    The Global Arbitration Review and Who’s Who Legal describe Dr Shin as a “top-notch advocate that will be one to watch in the coming years at the top of the Korean market” who possesses a “deep understanding of cross-border transactions, which makes her expertise sought after in complex post-M&A disputes.” She received the “Lawyer of the Year” in the best Korean arbitration practitioner category in 2024 by the Legal Times, “Woman Lawyer of the Year” in Korea award by Asian Legal Business (Thomson Reuters) in 2023, and has been nominated as a “Rising Star” under 45, a “Leading Lawyer” in the field of international arbitration in Korea by the Legal Times since 2021.    Shin is dual licensed in the New York Bar and the Korean Bar, with in-depth knowledge and expertise in M&A disputes, finance, and corporate valuation. She is a graduate of Seoul National University (B.S., LL.B.), the Wharton School (MBA, in finance and business analytics), and Harvard Law School, where she earned her doctoral degree (SJD, in corporate governance and finance). Prior to joining Peter & Kim, Dr Shin practiced law at Bae, Kim & Lee LLC for 10 years, served as a fellow at Harvard Law School Program on Corporate Governance, and published journal articles on corporate governance and shareholder disputes in Delaware and Korea.  
Cameron Sim

Cameron Sim

Cameron Sim has extensive global experience as counsel for corporates and sovereigns in commercial and investment arbitrations and related court proceedings. He is admitted in Australia, England & Wales, Hong Kong, and New York, and is a Registered Foreign Lawyer in the Singapore International Commercial Court. Cameron represents clients across a range of industries, including banking and finance, energy and mining, insurance, pharmaceuticals, private equity, retail, sports, and telecommunications. He has acted in proceedings under all leading arbitration rules in key arbitral seats. Cameron is recommended for international arbitration in leading directories. He is commended as a “superb arbitration lawyer”, “truly formidable”, and “a stand-out star”, who “combines outstanding technical ability with being commercially savvy”, is “very efficient”, “understand[s] the needs of clients and the weaknesses of the other party very accurately”, and has “intellectual prowess combined with a strategic mindset which make him an asset to any matter” (Legal 500 Asia-Pacific (2023 — 2025)). He is also described as “a superb and unrelenting advocate” and “a force to be reckoned with”, with “outstanding skills of coordination, especially in cross-border matters”, and “excellent academic background and intuition” (Who’s Who Legal (2022 — 2025)). Cameron sits as arbitrator and is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators. He has been appointed as arbitrator in both institutional and ad hoc arbitrations. Cameron is also a member of the Proceedings Committee of the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC). Cameron’s legal publications have been cited with approval by courts and commentators. He is the author of Emergency Arbitration (Oxford University Press 2021), the first-ever treatise on the procedure. Prior to his arbitration career, Cameron clerked for the President of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom and in the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council.
Charis Tan

Charis Tan

Charis is tri-qualified (Singapore, England & Wales and New York) and has specialised in international arbitration her entire career. Her practice straddles international commercial and investment treaty arbitration and public international law. She trained under Senior Counsel Michael Hwang, before joining an international firm where she worked with one of the top teams in the world for public international law and investment treaty arbitration. In 2020, she joined Peter & Kim, launching the Singapore office. Her experience includes international commercial and investment arbitrations under the rules of major arbitration institutions, including ICSID, ICC, SIAC, HKIAC, KCAB, AIAC and SCC, as well as ad hoc proceedings under UNCITRAL Rules. Charis is appointed as Counsel and Arbitrator, and she has also served as an arbitrator in WTO trade proceedings. She regularly acts for States, and has represented them in ISDS proceedings and high-profile State-to-State disputes before the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Her cases almost always involve complex multi-layered disputes involving the interplay between commercial relations, regulation, policy, and domestic and international law. Charis has been referred to as “formidable arbitration counsel”, with “great familiarity with the rules and personas involved” and “very deep technical international arbitration expertise“, “simply outstanding” and “an amazing practitioner“, recommended by Lexology (formerly Who’s Who Legal), Global Arbitration Review (GAR), Legal 500 and Chambers amongst others. An initiative she spearheaded for the training of Government officials was awarded the Asia Pacific FT Innovative Lawyers Award. Previously Charis taught adjunct at the National University of Singapore (NUS) for almost a decade. She is co-editor and author of Investment Protection in Southeast Asia, A Country-by-Country Guide on Arbitration Laws and Bilateral Investment Treaties (2017), Jus Mundi’s Wiki Notes on Investment Law and Arbitration (2021), and Practical Public International Law and its Implications for Businesses (2025). AREAS OF EXPERTISE \tArbitration \tPublic International Law \tPrivate International Law \tInternational Investment Law \tJoint Ventures / Consortia INDUSTRY SECTORS \tOil \tGas \tEnergy & Power REPRESENTATIVE CASES \tAppointed on a WTO Panel to determine a trade dispute between the European Union (EU) and the United States (US) relating to anti-dumping and countervailing duties. \tOn the Counsel team for Colombia in two International Court of Justice (ICJ) cases brought by Nicaragua relating to delimitation of the outer continental shelf and alleged violations of sovereign rights and maritime spaces. \tRepresenting the Government of Vietnam in two investor-State cases brought by Chinese investors arising out of a construction project. \tActing for an Eastern European State in a high-profile commercial arbitration under UNCITRAL Rules arising out of the construction of a trans-border highway, a project worth €1.4 billion. \tActing for a South Asian State in an ad hoc UNCITRAL commercial arbitration between an investor and a State in relation to a concession over an airport, in a claim worth more than US$1 billion. \tRepresenting an Indonesian oil company in an ICC arbitration for failure to supply gas under a significant contract, resulting in a claim for more than US$500 million. \tAppointed as a Presiding Arbitrator in an SIAC arbitration relating to the sale and purchase of commodities involving multiple jurisdictions. \tLead Counsel in an ICC arbitration in a claim brought by a French investor against an investment company based in Vietnam. \tLead Counsel in an SIAC arbitration between a Chinese company and Singapore-based private equity fund relating to investments in the food sector. \tCo-Lead Counsel representing a listed American renewables company in its claim against a supplier of solar panels in a dispute worth almost US$200 million under SIAC Rules. \tActing for a Chinese State-owned entity in an SCC arbitration concerning a consultancy agreement against a Middle Eastern management company in relation to a petrochemical project worth US$750 million. \tOn the Counsel team for Peru in the ICJ case of Peru v. Chile relating to maritime delimitation. \tRepresented a Middle Eastern State in three inter-related ICSID arbitrations relating to investments in ports and customs systems. \tCounsel for an Eastern European State in an ICSID arbitration involving a longstanding investment in a motorway in Europe. RANKING \t2025 – Lexology Index: Arbitration \t2025 – Chambers and Partners, Dispute Resolution: Arbitration (Asia-Pacific) \t2024 – WWL Global Elite Thought Leader, recognizing the top practitioners globally, achieved by only around 5% of WWL-listed professionals. \t2023 – Who’s Who Legal: Arbitration 2023, listed among the “Most Highly Regarded” Partners in Asia Pacific. \t2022 – Who’s Who Legal (Southeast Asia). \t2022 – The Legal 500 Asia Pacific 2022. \t2022 – Who’s Who Legal: Arbitration 2022, Future Leaders (Partners). \t2021 – Who’s Who Legal (Southeast Asia). QUOTES WWL (Southeast Asia, 2021) says: Charis Tan is a “formidable arbitration counsel”, according to sources who laud her “very deep technical international arbitration expertise” and “great familiarity with the rules and personas involved”. Global Arbitration Review quotes a client as saying that Charis was “simply outstanding”. Who’s Who Legal names Charis as a “Future Leader” in arbitration (2022): “Charis combines deep technical expertise together with a profound understanding of the client’s commercial goal” “She is a practical and effective lawyer” “She distils complex legal concepts in a highly palatable manner” The Legal 500 Asia Pacific (2022) highlighted Peter & Kim in Singapore as a “firm to watch”, stating: “Peter & Kim‘s Singapore international arbitration practice was set up by Charis Tan… in April 2020. Tan is tri-qualified in Singapore, England & Wales and New York and has particular experience in international arbitration and public international law and advises States in investment treaty disputes.” In 2023, Chambers and Partners ranked Peter & Kim Singapore in Band 1 among highly regarded firms for arbitration. Who’s Who Legal (2023) named Charis among the “Most Highly Regarded” partners in Asia Pacific: “An amazing practitioner”
Pierre Tercier

Pierre Tercier

Prof. Dr. Pierre Tercier is a senior counsel at Peter & Kim in Geneva. He is an Emeritus Professor of the University of Fribourg, a Doctor honoris causa of the University of Paris II Panthéon-Assas, the honorary President of the ICC International Court of Arbitration, and a prominent international arbitrator with extensive experience in international commercial and investment arbitration. Prof. Tercier has served as party-appointed arbitrator and president in over 150 arbitrations under various rules (ICC, ICSID, LCIA, SIAC, CRCICA, SCC, UNCITRAL) covering a broad range of sectors. He chaired such seminal cases, such as Abaclat and others v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/5) and Desert Line Projects LLC v. Republic of Yemen (ICSID Case No. ARB/05/17). In addition to his arbitrator practice, Prof. Tercier gives lectures on arbitration in several Universities around the world. He has authored numerous articles on international arbitration as well as authoritative treatises notably on contract law. He is well-known in Switzerland for his contribution to the study and development of contract, tort, construction and competition law. AREAS OF EXPERTISE \tArbitration / Litigation \tCompetition law \tInternational Investment Law INDUSTRY SECTORS \tConstruction & Engineering \tEnergy & Power \tPharmaceutical & Biotech \tMining & Metals REPRESENTATIVE CASES Prof. Tercier acted as arbitrator in over 150 cases. The list below is merely indicative: Commercial arbitration cases: \tPresident of the tribunal in two related ICC arbitrations, concerning the termination of contracts in the military industry. \tCo-arbitrator in an ICC arbitration concerning a major construction project. \tPresident of the tribunal in an ICC case between a Finnish and a Turkish telecommunication firm, in relation to an exclusive supply contract. \tCo-arbitrator in an ICC arbitration between a French multinational group specializing in renewable energy and a German multinational company, concerning a Finnish nuclear power plant. \tPresident of the tribunal in an ICC arbitration, with seat in New-York (USA), between three oil companies incorporated respectively in Bermuda, the Netherlands, and Venezuela, in relation with a concession agreement for oil production. \tPresident of the tribunal in an ICC arbitration between an American and an Algerian oil company, in relation to several contracts involving the sale of liquefied natural gas. \tCo-arbitrator in an ICC arbitration, with seat in Zurich, between a Ukrainian State company and a Turkish construction company, in relation with the construction of a highway and a railway bridge in Kiev, Ukraine. \tPresident of the tribunal in an ICC arbitration concerning the price revision of a long-term gas supply agreement between a Greek and a Turkish company. \tPresident of the tribunal in the ICC case between a German company and a French company, in relation with the shareholding in a company specializing in the production of nuclear energy. \tPresident of the tribunal in an ICC arbitration between an Asian government and a French company, concerning the reimbursement of commissions in a military contract. \tPresident of the tribunal in an ICC arbitration between a French and a Greek bank, in relation to a shareholding dispute. \tPresident of the tribunal in an ICC arbitration between a French telecommunication firm and a Luxembourg company, concerning the use of orbital slots and frequencies. \tCo-arbitrator in an ICC arbitration, with seat in Paris, between high-end French department stores and French banks, in relation with a shareholding agreement and valuation of an enterprise. \tPresident of the tribunal in an ad hoc arbitration, with seat in Lebanon, between a State and a telecommunication firm, concerning the construction of a mobile phone network. \tPresident of the tribunal in an UNCITRAL arbitration between a national State-owned oil company and a British oil and gas company, in relation with oil production. \tPresident of the tribunal in an UNCITRAL arbitration, between a State-owned gas supplier and a Spanish gas company, concerning the construction of a natural gas liquefaction plant. Investment cases: \tPresident of the tribunal in the ICSID case Abaclat and others v. Argentine Republic (Case No. ARB/07/5) \tPresident of the tribunal in the ICSID case Desert Line Projects LLC v. Republic of Yemen (Case No. ARB/05/17) \tPresident of the tribunal in the ICSID case Capital Financial Holdings Luxembourg S.A. v. Republic of Cameroon (Case No. ARB/15/18) \tPresident of the tribunal in the ICSID case Baggerwerken Decloedt En Zoon NV v. Republic of the Philippines (Case No. ARB/11/27) \tPresident of the tribunal in the ICSID case Getma International and others v. Republic of Guinea (Case No. ARB/11/29) \tPresident of the tribunal in the ICSID case Société Civile Immobilière De Gaëta v. République de Guinée (Case No. ARB/12/36) \tPresident of the tribunal in the ICSID case Malincorp Ltd. v. The Arab Republic of Egypt (Case No. ARB/08/18) \tPresident of the tribunal in the ICSID case Rachel S. Grynberg, Stephen M. Grynberg, Miriam Z Grynberg and RSM Production Corp. v. Grenada (Case No. ARB/10/6). QUOTES WWL 2020 (Thought Leaders) says: "Pierre Tercier is 'a wonderful arbitrator', as well as 'highly independent and one of the best chairmen'. He is an authority when it comes to commercial and investment arbitration." Chambers Global 2020 states: "Pierre Tercier is 'one of the leading names in Switzerland and does a broad range of commercial and investment cases, according to sources. He remains a popular choice for complex international disputes and is often selected to act as president of ICC tribunals."        
Deborah Tomkinson

Deborah Tomkinson

Deborah is the Director of Corporate Strategy at Peter & Kim, responsible for strategic development and special projects. She also brings her expertise in international arbitration to case work as Counsel. Prior to joining Peter & Kim, Deborah was the Secretary-General of the Australian Centre for International Commercial Arbitration (ACICA). In that role for over 12 years, Deborah was instrumental to ACICA’s strategic growth and development and its recognition as a leading arbitral institution. Deborah has also held roles at national and international law firms both in Australia and the UAE, with a focus on dispute resolution and management, primarily in the construction & infrastructure and energy & resources sectors. She has served as a Council Member of the International Federation of Commercial Arbitration Institutions (IFCAI), a Vice President of the Asia Pacific Regional Arbitration Group (APRAG), a R.E.A.L Ambassador and as a member of the ICCA Cross Institutional Task Force on Gender Diversity in Arbitral Appointments and Proceedings and the ERA Search Committee. Deborah is recommended in Doyle’s Leading Arbitration Lawyers (Australia) for 2025 and in Lexology Index – Australia & New Zealand – Arbitration, 2025. She was recognised by Who’s Who Legal as an Arbitration Future Leader from 2021 to 2024, was a finalist for the Lawyers Weekly, Women in Law Awards (Executive of Year) in 2024 and was included in The Legal 500: Private Practice Powerlist – Arbitration for Australia and New Zealand in 2022. Deborah sits on various ACICA committees including the ACICA Judicial Liaison Committee, ACICA Sustainability Taskforce and ACICA South Pacific Taskforce. Representative Cases \tRepresenting a large oil pipeline consortium in relation to multi-million-dollar LCIA arbitral proceedings concerning the operation of a quality bank system. \tRepresenting a Dutch industrial services company in Dubai International Arbitration Centre (DIAC) proceedings with respect to claims relating to wrongful termination and defective work on an offshore project. \tActing for a Dubai-based property developer in DIAC arbitration proceedings in relation to claims for breach of contract and misrepresentation regarding a multi-million dollar purchase of land. \tActing for a Kuwaiti-based aviation company in relation to DIFC-LCIA proceedings with respect to the breach of a services agreement. \tAdvising a US Hotel Management corporation in relation to the enforcement of arbitral awards and issues of sovereign immunity in the UAE. \tActing for an Australian steel corporation in Abu Dhabi Commercial Conciliation and Arbitration Centre (ADCCAC) proceedings in connection with an investment services contract. \tAdvising a major Australian oil and gas exploration and production company in relation to arbitral proceedings in relation to a network of contracts subject to an umbrella arbitration agreement. \tActing for an Australian state government agency in a facilitation process to resolve multiple disputes related to defects arising under a design, construct, operate and maintain deed for a road project. \tRepresenting a Dubai based property developer in DIFC Court proceedings in relation to claims in excess of AED180M. \tActing for a foreign property developer in relation to multiple proceedings brought by off-plan purchasers in the First Instance Court of Dubai, Dubai Court of Appeal, and the Dubai Court of Cassation. \tActing for and advising a US-based pharmaceutical company in relation to an FCPA due diligence review of an acquired company with respect to its operations in the UAE, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Nigeria. \tActing for a Turkish construction company in relation to circa AED200M claims for extensions of time, additional works, and delay costs. Advising in relation to the commencement of arbitral proceedings under UAE law. \tActing for a large Australian construction contractor in relation to a circa AUD150 million claim in respect of the renovation and construction of a shopping centre in the Supreme Court of NSW and NSW Court of Appeal. \tActing for a large Australian commercial contractor in respect of a damages claim for misleading and deceptive conduct in relation to a dam spillway project, including proceedings run in the Supreme Court of NSW and resisting an application for special leave to appeal to the High Court of Australia.
Micael Totaro

Micael Totaro

Micael Totaro is a Swiss qualified lawyer, member of the Geneva Bar, who specialises in international commercial and sports arbitration. He has been involved as co-counsel and secretary in over 60 international arbitration proceedings (ICC, Swiss Arbitration, CAS). His practice encompasses a wide range of commercial topics, such as sponsoring, licensing, distribution & agency, employment, purchases and trading, web-based user agreements, mergers & acquisitions, joint venture and shareholder agreements. He has also acted in numerous arbitration-related proceedings, including debt enforcements and attachments, enforcement and recognition of arbitral awards. Micael has more than 10 years of experience at the highest level of the sports industry. He has been involved in some of the most critical operations of the commercialisation of sports, including major sponsorship deals, development and organisation of international sports events, supply of equipment, licensing and distribution of TV/Media rights and broadcasting/live feed production agreements. He has an extensive knowledge of the resolution of sports-specific disputes, having acted before the Court of Arbitration for Sport and major sports federations’ judicial bodies (FIFA, UEFA, FIBA, FIVB, UCI), in a variety of cases related to players’ eligibility and transfers, players/clubs and agents-related disputes, qualification for the Olympic Games, disciplinary and anti-doping proceedings. He is also frequently involved in complex international commercial disputes stemming from a variety of industries, including oil, gas, mining, metals, commodities trading, cryptocurrencies and banking. AREAS OF EXPERTISE \tInternational Arbitration \tSports Arbitration INDUSTRY SECTORS \tSports \tMedia & Entertainment \tEnergy & Natural Resources \tWeb 3.0, Blockchain & Cryptocurrencies Trading \tCommodities Trading \tRetail, Luxury Goods & Fashion \tEvents, Hospitality & MICE REPRESENTATIVE CASES \tCo-counsel for a football agent in a dispute related to agency fees in a >EUR 100 million transfer against an international football player. \tCo-counsel for an athlete regarding the qualification at the 2024 Paris Olympic Games. \tCo-counsel for an Australian football player in an anti-doping dispute at both national and CAS levels against a national anti-doping agency. \tCo-counsel for a national football federation in an appeal filed before the Swiss Federal Tribunal against an arbitral award issued by the Court of Arbitration for Sport. \tCo-counsel for a company in a dispute related to the management and the organisation of ATP (professional tennis) tournaments. \tCo-counsel for a top bicycle brand in a dispute related to major sponsorship agreements and agency’s fees. \tCo-counsel for FC BARCELONA in a EUR 3 million dispute related to the purchase of an option right related to a rising-star player. \tCo-counsel for FC BARCELONA before the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) in a transfer dispute involving the Brazilian player NEYMAR JR. and his first club SANTOS FC. \tCo-counsel for a majority shareholder in the M&A operations related to the acquisition of the Haute Route Series by the Ironman Group. \tCo-counsel for a professional cycling team in a dispute against its bicycle sponsor. \tCo-counsel for a professional cycling team in the sale of the shares of its managing entity and the takeover of the UCI WorldTour licence. \tCo-counsel for a high-end sports clothing company in a sponsorship dispute. \tCo-counsel in a > USD 150 million dispute representing a trader in an ICC arbitration against one of the leading cryptocurrencies’ centralised exchanges. \tSecretary to the Tribunal in a commercial arbitration concerning a licensing and construction dispute (SCAI). \tAssistant to the President of a CAS Panel in a multimillion TV & Media Rights arbitration.
Rodica Turtoi

Rodica Turtoi

Rodica Turtoi is specialized in international commercial and investment treaty arbitrations. She has experience acting as a counsel and administrative secretary to arbitral tribunals in proceedings conducted under the ICSID, ICC, SCC, SCAI and UNCITRAL Rules in both English and French. Prior to joining the firm, she trained in the international arbitration practices of leading international firms in Paris and London. Rodica Turtoi graduated with a dual degree from Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne and Bucharest Universities. She also obtained a Master 2 in International Trade Law from Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne University and a Master of Laws (LL.M.) from Cornell Law School. Representative Cases \tCounsel in a multi-billion dollar ad-hoc arbitration dispute between a state-owned enterprise and a sovereign state, involving aspects of public international law \tCounsel in an ICC arbitration for a major mining and metallurgy consortium with more than USD 500 million in dispute, under Swiss law \tActing as part of a counsel team in an investment treaty arbitration between a French investor and a European State relating to tax reforms (ICSID), which concluded with a favorable decision for the client. \tActed as counsel in an ICC arbitration under French law in a dispute between an Eastern European automobile producer and a North African distributor, seat in Geneva \tAssisted in a commercial arbitration between parties based in the Middle East related to the contractual review of the prices of gas (ICC Rules) \tSecretary to the Arbitral Tribunal in an arbitration under the UNCITRAL Rules, related to an oil and gas concession, seat in London \tSecretary to the Arbitral Tribunal in an ICC arbitration, seated in Singapore, concerning a post-M&A dispute and allegations of fraud Rodica is admitted to practice in New York State (2015) and passed the Paris Bar (2016).
Julia Xoudis

Julia Xoudis

Prof. Dr. Julia Xoudis has practised as an attorney for over 20 years, specializing in international commercial arbitration, contract law and competition law. She has acted in more than 40 international arbitrations, both ad hoc and institutional, including high-stake cases involving complex contractual and corporate disputes. In parallel to her practice at the bar, she is an Associate Professor at the Faculty of Law of the University of Geneva, where she teaches law of obligations (contract and tort law). Her research interests and publications focus on law of obligations, competition law and legal method. AREAS OF EXPERTISE \tArbitration / Litigation \tCommercial Contracts \tDistribution / Agency \tInternational Sales \tJoint Ventures / Consortia \tMergers & Acquisitions \tCompetition law INDUSTRY SECTORS \tCommodities Trading \tFashion & Luxury Goods \tOil & Gas \tPharmaceutical & Biotech \tTransportation & Logistics; Shipping REPRESENTATIVE CASES \tCo-arbitrator in a dispute related to the validity and performance of a share purchase agreement. \tCounsel in a highly contentious arbitration between a state-owned enterprise and a sovereign state, involving aspects of public international law, with an amount in dispute of USD several billion. \tCounsel in setting aside proceedings against an award in an ad hoc arbitration, securing an important win for the client at the Swiss Supreme Court level. \tCounsel in a case involving two state-owned entities in a highly complex dispute stemming from oil production and delivery agreements, securing an award of more than a billion USD for the clients. \tRegular advice on contractual issues in the area of agency and distribution, including Swiss and European competition law aspects.
Jennifer Yoo

Jennifer Yoo

Jennifer (Eun Kyung) Yoo is a partner at Peter & Kim in Seoul and is dual qualified in Korea and New York. Jennifer has represented and advised clients on a wide range of international arbitration and cross-border litigation cases. She has acted as counsel in international arbitrations conducted under various institutional rules including those of the ICC, LCIA, SIAC, KCAB, HKIAC, and UNCITRAL. In particular, she has extensive experience in disputes relating to large scale construction or development projects, involving multiple claims, parties, experts and counsel. She also has expertise in international trade and private international law issues. She frequently advises clients on international arbitration procedures, challenges and enforcement of international arbitral awards, and interim measures in respect of arbitration proceedings. Jennifer received an LL.M. from Harvard Law School in 2022, and her J.D. from Seoul National University in 2015. She is bilingual in Korean and English. AREAS OF EXPERTISE \tArbitration / Litigation \tKorean Litigation \tCross-Border Litigation \tProject Finance \tInternational project contracting \tPrivate International Law INDUSTRY SECTOR \tConstruction & Engineering \tEnergy & Power \tReal Estate REPRESENTATIVE CASES \tCounsel to a Korean EPC contractor against a consortium of Korea’s largest construction companies, in an LCIA arbitration seated in London and governed by English law concerning the construction of the first nuclear power plant in the UAE. \tCounsel to a major Korean construction company in an ICC arbitration arising out of a joint venture partnership formed for the development of an international business district in Korea. \tCounsel to a Korean steel manufacturing company in a SIAC arbitration against an Australian company, relating to steel fabrication and delivery works for a large-scale civil construction project in Sydney. \tCounsel to a Korean construction company in an ad hoc arbitration concerning a major civil works construction project located in Canada, involving claims for extension of time and additional costs as well as alleged defects. \tCounsel to a Korean nuclear power plant company in a KCAB arbitration concerning defective cables supplied for a nuclear power plant. \tCounsel to a Korean municipal government in an ICC arbitration for a dispute relating to a comprehensive project to develop the land and public waters of a free economic zone. \tCounsel to a private equity firm in a HKIAC arbitration in relation to the alleged invalid termination of a share purchase agreement. \tCounsel to ten insurance companies in an ad hoc arbitration concerning claims for insurance proceeds in connection with the failure of a key equipment in a coal-fired power plant. \tRegularly advises Korean construction companies on construction-related claims and potential disputes with subcontractors and/or employers. \tRegularly advises clients on international arbitration procedures, challenges and enforcement of international arbitral awards, interim measures in respect of arbitration proceedings. \tRegularly advises the Korean government on issues relating to World Trade Organization (WTO) disputes and other international trade disputes, and investor state disputes (ISD), etc.