Perkins Speaks On Privacy Issues In Using Contact-Tracing Apps

Target announced the compromise payment card information taken in-store between November 27 and December 15, 2013

On September 15, the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") issued a policy statement ("Statement") addressing the scope of its Health Breach Notification Rule ("Rule") on health apps and connected devices.

California's legislature has sent a comprehensive package of privacy, AI, and advertising bills to Governor Newsom's desk, with decisions due by September 30, 2026. The legislation addresses sensitive personal information protections, data broker obligations, AI-powered chatbot regulations, and digital replica rights, potentially reshaping how businesses handle consumer data and automated decision-making systems. Will these bills become law and set new national standards for technology regulation?

Meta Platforms has agreed to pay $17 billion over ten years to resolve multistate litigation alleging the company engineered Facebook and Instagram to addict minors while concealing the risks. Beyond the historic financial penalty, the settlement mandates sweeping platform changes including default usage limits, overnight lockouts, and parental controls for users under eighteen.

California's 2026 legislative session concluded with Governor Newsom signing several landmark privacy and AI bills into law, including comprehensive child safety measures, AI auditor oversight frameworks, and expanded data protection requirements. How will these new regulations reshape digital advertising, workplace AI deployment, and online platform obligations for businesses operating in California?

In a groundbreaking enforcement action, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has filed a lawsuit against Allstate Corporation and its subsidiary Arity, alleging systematic violations of the Texas Data Privacy and Security Act (TDPSA) and other consumer protection laws.

Mossack Fonseca. Before April 2016, most of us had never even heard of a Panamanian law firm by that name.

On September 23, 2025, the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) announced the approval of final regulations under the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) covering cybersecurity audits...

California's Senate Bill 690 eliminates the private right of action for pen register claims under CIPA when violations arise from website or mobile app tracking technologies, leaving enforcement solely to the Attorney General. The bill applies retroactively to claims filed after January 1, 2025, and awaits Governor Newsom's signature with an operative date of January 1, 2027.

2014 was a big year for data security breaches and 2015 may reveal even more complex and troubling problems.

The Fifth Circuit's decision in East Fork Enterprises v. EPA vacates EPA's methylene chloride risk management rule and underlying unreasonable risk determination, fundamentally challenging the agency's approach to TSCA administration. The ruling addresses critical issues including the "whole chemical" versus "condition of use" methodology, EPA's treatment of personal protective equipment in risk assessments, and the interpretation of "unreasonable risk" under TSCA.

On March 19, 2025, China's National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) released the Draft Implementing Measures and Working Procedures for Drug Clinical Trial Data Protection...

The EU Data Act's September 2026 deadline introduces a new access-by-design requirement for connected medical devices and related services, but the practical impact may be more limited than manufacturers expect. This analysis examines what life sciences companies must do to comply with both the upcoming milestone and the broader set of obligations that have been in force since September 2025.

The Federal Trade Commission has proposed a new enforcement policy targeting personalized pricing practices, signaling heightened scrutiny of businesses that use consumer data to set individualized prices. As states simultaneously advance their own surveillance pricing legislation—ranging from disclosure mandates to outright bans—companies face an increasingly complex regulatory landscape that demands...

TMT Time is a podcast that looks at the pressing and often unique issues facing the Technology, Media & Telecommunications Industry.

US extradition proceedings are regulated by both treaty and US domestic legislation.

The Court of Justice of the European Union has issued a preliminary ruling in Case C-427/24 Diagramm Halbach, establishing critical principles for determining whether products qualify as medical devices under the EU Medical Device Regulation. The judgment clarifies that manufacturer advertising alone does not determine medical device status, and that products must objectively perform medical purposes to fall within the regulatory definition.

A federal bankruptcy court has approved the disclosure and voting process for Omnicare's Chapter 11 plan, which includes a proposed settlement resolving nearly $1 billion in False Claims Act liability stemming from allegations of dispensing drugs without valid prescriptions. The settlement would see CVS Health Corporation and Omnicare pay at least $440 million to the Department of Justice, marking a significant reduction from the original judgment while highlighting ongoing enforcement priorities in healthc

A federal court in Illinois recently dismissed a cybersecurity-related False Claims Act qui tam complaint against Archer Daniels Midland Company, primarily on materiality grounds. The decision highlights the stringent requirements relators face when pursuing cybersecurity FCA claims, particularly the need to demonstrate that alleged cybersecurity deficiencies would have significantly affected the government's payment decisions. The court's analysis provides critical guidance on pleading requirements for fal

The Fifth Circuit's en banc decision in Sterling v. City of Jackson tests whether residents exposed to lead-contaminated municipal drinking water can sue under Section 1983 for substantive due process violations. In a 10-5 ruling, the court held that environmental harms caused by government mismanagement belong to tort law and the political process, not constitutional claims, creating a significant circuit split with implications for how environmental compliance failures by public officials are litigated.