Webinar – Public Resources For Investigating Boundary Disputes (Video)

The New Jersey Supreme Court refused to allow a respondent to benefit from its refusal to pay arbitration fees in Roach v. BM Motoring, LLC, 2017 WL 931430 (NJ March 9, 2017).

The top ten largest class action settlements in securities cases in the U.S. have recouped tens of billions of dollars in damages.

On September 7, 2012, ALJ Rogers granted complainant Microchip Technology Incorporated, and respondents Intersil Corporation, Zilker Labs LLC, and Techwell LLC’s joint motion to terminate Inv. No. 337-TA-840.

When facing the need to petition the 9th Circuit for a discretionary interlocutory appeal in federal court, understanding the procedural requirements becomes critical. This column examines the specific rules governing appeals by permission, including petitions under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure rule 23(f) for class-action certification orders, and explores the intricacies of Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure rule 5.

Boston/Providence Partners Brian C. Newberry and Lauren A. Farley represented a civil engineering firm in a complex design and construction defect case involving allegations that the foundation ..

Today the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v. Owens, No. 13-719, a case involving the procedural requirements for removing a class action from state to federal court under the Class Action Fairness Act ("CAFA").

A federal court granted Disney's motion to compel arbitration in an antitrust class action, allowing the company to invoke fuboTV's subscriber terms of service after acquiring a 70% stake in the streaming platform. The ruling demonstrates how corporate mergers can fundamentally alter litigation strategy by enabling non-signatories to enforce arbitration agreements containing "future affiliates" provisions.

A Massachusetts federal court allowed a defendant to amend its answer late in litigation to add a Chapter 93A counterclaim based on newly discovered internal communications.

A company that receives a demand letter under California’s Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA) should assume that a California consumer class action may be coming.

The Federal Circuit, in HD Silicon Solutions LLC v. Microchip Technology, Inc., No. 2023-1397 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 6, 2025), reiterated that extrinsic evidence may be used only to assist in the proper understanding...