Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 JANUARY 2023

Hughes Appointed President Of San Diego Chapter Of ABOTA

Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Explore more from Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP

Peter M. Hughes (Partner-San Diego | San Francisco, CA) was sworn in as President & National Board Representative of the San Diego Chapter of the American Board Of Trial Advocates...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Author LinkedIn connections

Peter M. Hughes (Partner-San Diego | San Francisco, CA) was sworn in as President & National Board Representative of the San Diego Chapter of the American Board Of Trial Advocates (ABOTA). ABOTA is the preeminent invitation-only national association of jury trial attorneys. Prospective members must have at least five years of active experience as trial lawyers, have tried at least 10 civil jury trials to conclusion and possess additional litigation experience, and exhibit the virtues of civility, integrity and professionalism.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Labels Are Not Enough: Why Calling It ‘Sexual Harassment’ May Not Be Enough To Defeat Arbitration

A California federal court ruled that plaintiffs cannot avoid arbitration simply by labeling their claims as "sexual harassment." The decision requires plaintiffs to plausibly allege conduct that actually constitutes sexual harassment under governing law before the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act applies. This ruling establishes important limits on attempts to circumvent arbitration agreements through strategic claim labeling.
United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Greenberg Traurig
Greenberg Traurig
Article

Court Bars Employer From Distributing Arbitration Agreement To Settlement Class Members During Pendency Of Class Settlement

A federal magistrate judge blocked an employer from distributing a dispute resolution agreement with a class action waiver to settlement class members between preliminary and final approval stages. The court found that despite the agreement's non-coercive language, the timing created unacceptable risks of confusion that could interfere with class members' settlement rights.
United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Duane Morris LLP
Duane Morris LLP
Article

Southern District Of New York Grants Motion To Dismiss Securities Class Action Against Former Officers Of Business Communications Company

A federal judge dismissed a securities fraud class action against former executives of a business communications company, finding that plaintiffs failed to adequately plead actionable misstatements or establish scienter. The court analyzed allegations concerning revenue projections, financial disclosures, and internal controls during the company's transition from hardware to subscription-based software, ultimately determining that forward-looking statements were protected by safe harbor provisions and that
United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
A&O Shearman
A&O Shearman
Article

Ninth Circuit Amends Opinion Partially Reviving Putative Class Action Against Manufacturer Of Pop Culture Collectibles And Denies Rehearing Petitions

The Ninth Circuit has amended its opinion in a securities fraud class action against a pop culture collectibles manufacturer, clarifying that the company's risk disclosures improperly framed already-realized harms as hypothetical future risks. The court denied petitions for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc, maintaining its partial reversal of the district court's dismissal of claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act.
United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
A&O Shearman
A&O Shearman
Article

VIVEK SHAH STRIKES OUT AGAIN: Court Grants Drexel’s Motion To Dismiss His Claims For Lack Of Standing

Vivek Shah's latest legal defeat demonstrates how courts are scrutinizing CIPA claims when plaintiffs fail to establish concrete privacy injuries. The ruling in Shah v. Drexel Chemical Co. examines what constitutes actual harm when a plaintiff alleges website tracking violations based on generic search terms and routine metadata. This case provides critical guidance on the evidentiary threshold required to survive a motion to dismiss in privacy litigation.
United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Troutman Amin LLP
Troutman Amin LLP
Article

Eleventh Circuit Upholds False Claims Act Qui Tam Provisions, But Broader Constitutional Challenges Remain

The Eleventh Circuit’s recent decision in United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC marks an important development in the ongoing constitutional debate surrounding the False Claims Act’s qui tam provisions. By rejecting an Appointments Clause challenge, the court aligned itself with every other circuit that has spoken on the issue.
United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Winston Taylor
Winston Taylor
Article

Expert Reports Generated By Artificial Intelligence Are Prone To Being Ignored (Shirran v. The Owners, Strata Plan KAS 4004; Laake v. 3M Company)

Expert reports are often invaluable in civil and criminal cases. In general, these reports provide the trier of fact with an opinion from an expert witness who possesses specialized knowledge, skill or experience on technical or scientific issues in dispute that are beyond the trier of fact’s knowledge or experience.
United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Article

Eleventh Circuit Holds FCA Qui Tam Litigation Does Not Violate The Appointments Clause In Article II Of The U.S. Constitution – But Questions Remain

The Eleventh Circuit's reversal in U.S. ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates addresses one of the most anticipated False Claims Act decisions in years, ruling that qui tam provisions do not violate the Appointments Clause. While this decision aligns with other circuit courts, it leaves critical constitutional questions unresolved, including Take Care and Vesting Clause challenges that could reshape FCA litigation.
United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Article

Old Rule, Same Implications: Court Dismisses And Narrows Claims In Baltimore Bridge Collapse Matter Based On The Well-Established Robins Dry Dock Rule

A federal court applies the century-old Robins Dry Dock rule to dismiss and narrow claims arising from the Baltimore bridge collapse, reinforcing limitations on recovering purely economic losses in maritime law. The decision examines which parties can seek damages when infrastructure failures disrupt commerce and cause financial harm without direct physical injury to property.
United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Article

SB 54 Is In Effect: What California’s New Packaging Law Means For Your Business

Although being challenged by an injunction filed on August 20, 2026, by a coalition of 17 states, California’s SB 54 Plastic Pollution Prevention and Packaging Producer Responsibility Act is now in effect, and companies that sell, distribute, import, or ship packaged products into California should be evaluating whether they have compliance obligations.
United StatesPrivacy
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Article

NV Supreme Court Vacates $5.5M Judgment Over Excluded Medical Records

This website uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance site functionality, analyze performance, and deliver personalized content and advertising experiences. Users maintain control over cookie preferences across different categories, with the ability to modify settings and review detailed information about data handling practices, third-party involvement, and individual privacy rights.
United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Article

CIPA In The Digital Age: What Businesses Need To Know About The Variety Media Appeal

This content presents information about cookie usage and data privacy practices, explaining how cookies operate on the website and detailing user options for managing cookie preferences. It outlines the categories of cookies employed, their purposes, and references comprehensive privacy documentation for users seeking detailed information about data handling practices.
United StatesPrivacy
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP