Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 OCTOBER 2025

Class Action Decisions Published September 2025

Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP
Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP
Contributor
Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP

Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP

The Firm Shook, Hardy & Bacon’s London group offers an elite, globally recognised product liability...

View firm profile
Explore more from Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP

The Ninth Circuit held that if a plaintiff files a lawsuit in state court seeking only equitable relief and the case is properly removed to federal court, a defendant can defeat remand on equitable jurisdiction grounds by waiving the adequate-remedy-at-law issue.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Mitchell F. Engel
Mitchell F. Engel

Highlights from this issue include: 

  • Class Action Fairness Removal. The Ninth Circuit held that if a plaintiff files a lawsuit in state court seeking only equitable relief and the case is properly removed to federal court, a defendant can defeat remand on equitable jurisdiction grounds by waiving the adequate-remedy-at-law issue.
  • Automobile Insurance. The Ninth Circuit affirmed a district court order denying certification of a class of auto insurance policyholders who alleged Progressive miscalculated the actual cash value of totaled vehicles because it applied a “projected sold adjustment,” which was a reduction to the list prices of comparable vehicles to reflect consumer negotiations. (There are a lot of cases in different jurisdictions advancing this theory and courts are splitting on whether such claims can be certified.)
  • Securities. The Ninth Circuit held a district court did not err by considering circumstantial evidence of a price drop immediately after an alleged corrective disclosure in determining whether to certify a class.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from