Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 MARCH 2026

Class Action Decisions Published January 2026

Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP
Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP
Contributor
Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP

Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP

The Firm Shook, Hardy & Bacon’s London group offers an elite, globally recognised product liability...

View firm profile
Explore more from Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP

Standing in Class Action Cases. The Ninth Circuit held that pursuant to TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, 594 U.S. 413 (2021), following class certification...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Mitchell F. Engel
Mitchell F. Engel

Highlights from this issue include: 

  • Standing in Class Action Cases. The Ninth Circuit held that pursuant to TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, 594 U.S. 413 (2021), following class certification, both named and unnamed class members in a money damages suit must present evidence of standing at summary judgment.
  • Representation of Class and Individuals in Separate Lawsuits. The First Circuit provided guidance on whether counsel may concurrently represent individual plaintiffs and a class against the same defendants. It noted leading treatises were split on the question and it found no on-point case law in any circuit. The First Circuit made clear that it was not deciding whether the court should have appointed this lawyer as class counsel in the first instance—it only decided that class counsel's simultaneous representation of three individual claimants with similar claims against the same defendants did not preclude the district court from approving a class-action settlement.
  • Attorneys' Fees. The Tenth Circuit held that either a percentage-of-the-fund or a lodestar analysis could satisfy Oklahoma's class action attorneys' fees statute, so long as the ultimate award is reasonable.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from