This Week In Tariffs: April 23rd (With Tina Toma) (Video)

After the fall of the Empire in China in 1912, and before the takeover of China by the Communists in 1949, there was a period in which a number of warlords controlled different areas of China. The United States felt that there was a need for certainty in the dealings of its citizens abroad therefore, for more than two decades in the early twentieth century, the United States maintained an unusual federal court on foreign soil—one that exercised full judicial authority over American citizens living and working in China.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection has begun processing IEEPA tariff refunds through its CAPE system, but Phase III covering finally liquidated entries faces delays and requires court orders. With the Department of Justice appealing the universal refund order and class certification pending, importers with finally liquidated entries may need to file individual lawsuits at the Court of International Trade to preserve their claims before statutory deadlines expire.

The U.S.-Canada trading relationship has reached a critical juncture as both nations implement escalating trade measures, with Canada's counter-tariffs taking effect and the United States responding with unprecedented import bans on Canadian alcoholic beverages, dairy products, and motorcycles. These actions mark a significant expansion of the Trump Administration's use of Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930, moving beyond additional tariffs to outright import restrictions. What does this escalation mean

Five foundational ISDS decisions reveal how investment tribunals balance Indigenous consultation rights under ILO Convention 169 with treaty protections for foreign mining investors. This analysis examines the evolving legal framework governing State obligations, social license requirements, and the circumstances under which community opposition triggers treaty liability.

This monthly update tracks the latest developments in Russia/Ukraine sanctions across US, EU, and UK jurisdictions, covering new designations, general license extensions, legislative proposals, and enforcement actions. The update also examines Russia's countermeasures, including shadow fleet expansion and legal restrictions on foreign investors, while highlighting international coordination efforts by Switzerland, Canada, and New Zealand.

Navigate the latest international trade developments including new executive orders on electrical grid equipment, FCC updates to covered lists for power inverters and robotic devices, FinCEN's finalized beneficial ownership reporting rules, and BIS restrictions on critical mineral exports. Discover how these regulatory changes impact compliance obligations across multiple sectors.

Meet the legal professionals at Foley & Lardner LLP who specialize in serving clients across various practice areas. This directory provides direct contact information and professional profiles for attorneys Roberto Arena Reyes Retana, Marco Najera Martinez, Andres Alvarez Cordero, and Lilia Alvarez.

The U.S. Department of Commerce has launched antidumping and countervailing duty investigations targeting linear hydraulic cylinders from five countries, with petitioners advocating for an unusually broad scope that would trace component origins through multi-country supply chains and apply duties even after third-country assembly.

General counsel and chief compliance officers at growing organizations face mounting pressure to manage third-party risks across sanctions, anti-corruption, and export controls without building expensive internal infrastructure. Taft's technology-enabled solution centralizes screening, risk-based due diligence, and approvals while creating audit-ready documentation that satisfies boards and enforcement agencies.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection is considering sweeping regulatory changes that would require importers to provide unprecedented visibility into their supply chains, including foreign export documentation, global business identifiers, and AI-driven tracing technologies. These proposed amendments stem from Executive Order 14411 and could fundamentally reshape compliance obligations for companies importing goods into the United States. CBP is seeking public comment on 64 questions by December 1, 2026, offe

An apartment complex was insured under a $1 million primary policy and a $10 million excess policy. Following a fatal shooting at the complex, the deceased’s estate made two settlement demands within the primary policy limits.

Dykema's Automotive, Mobility & Transportation Group releases its Spring 2026 roundup, featuring the newly published 2026 Automotive Trends Report...

Dykema’s automotive work began with repossessing cars. Today, we’re helping clients navigate the legal challenges of vehicles that can drive themselves. Over the past 100 years, our work has evolved alongside the industry, from regulatory shifts and product liability...

One of the most valuable AI companies in the world may have just accidentally given away one of its crown jewels and immediately turned to copyright law to limit the damage.

Michigan's Department of Treasury has reversed its controversial position on wholesale cannabis tax administration, clarifying that product transferred to retailers before January 1, 2026 will not be subject to the new wholesale tax when resold between retailers. This reversal aligns Treasury guidance with the actual statutory language requiring tax only on the first transfer from wholesaler to retailer.

The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York has denied an insurer’s motion to dismiss coverage litigation, holding under New York law that a run-off D&O policy’s subsequent acts exclusion does not bar coverage for an underlying securities class action.

If your voluntary benefits are employee-funded, they’re exempt from ERISA… right? Not necessarily.

If you’re working on a DSO transaction, there’s a compliance issue that comes up more often than most people expect.

This month's edition of Last Month at the Supreme Court® features a set of cases that collectively illustrate the Court's continued engagement with foundational questions of federal jurisdiction...

The Supreme Court heard argument in Enbridge Energy, LP v. Nessel (No. 24-783), a case that presents a deceptively narrow procedural question with potentially significant consequences for federal jurisdiction...