Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 OCTOBER 2014

NJ Supreme Court To Decide Whether LAD Protects Divorcing Employee

Proskauer Rose LLP
Proskauer Rose LLP
Contributor
Proskauer Rose LLP

Proskauer Rose LLP

At Proskauer, our singular focus is on advising and supporting our clients to achieve their goals...

View firm profile
Explore more from Proskauer Rose LLP

Last week, the New Jersey Supreme Court agreed to address whether the protection against marital status discrimination under the state’s Law Against Discrimination (LAD) serves to prevent an employer from discharging an employee "because of the anticipated effect of [the] employee’s imminent divorce on the workplace."

United StatesEmployment and HR
Joseph O'Keefe
Joseph O'Keefe
Daniel Saperstein
Daniel Saperstein
Author LinkedIn connections

Last week, the New Jersey Supreme Court agreed to address whether the protection against marital status discrimination under the state's Law Against Discrimination (LAD) serves to prevent an employer from discharging an employee "because of the anticipated effect of [the] employee's imminent divorce on the workplace."  As detailed in our monthly newsletter, the Appellate Division recently answered this question in the affirmative and, in so doing, for the first time "interpret[ed] 'marital status' to encompass the state of being divorced."  The case—Smith v. Millville Rescue Squad—is sure to receive attention in the coming months.  Stay tuned...

NJ Supreme Court To Decide Whether LAD Protects Divorcing Employee

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from