Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 JANUARY 2017

PIPE Transactions

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

In a year of significant volatility, it is not surprising that there was increased reliance on PIPE (private investment in public equity) transactions.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law
Anna Pinedo
Anna Pinedo
Carlos E. Juarez
Carlos E. Juarez
Author LinkedIn connections

In a year of significant volatility, it is not surprising that there was increased reliance on PIPE (private investment in public equity) transactions. Traditionally, PIPE transactions have provided a useful capital-raising alternative when the public markets are inhospitable. During this past year, energy companies relied on PIPE transactions in order to recapitalize their companies and many of these transactions resulted in change of control. We summarize the PIPE activity for 2016 in our infographic.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

See more popular content from