Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 DECEMBER 2016

FTC Eliminates Foreign Markets Exception To HSR Items 4(c) And 4(d)

Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP
Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP
Contributor
Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP

Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP

In an increasingly global and interconnected world, Hughes Hubbard sets itself apart as a robust...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP

On November 28, 2016, the Federal Trade Commission announced important changes to the Premerger Notification Office's guidance on complying with Hart-Scott-Rodino Items 4(c) and 4(d).

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law
William Kolasky
William Kolasky
Michael Salzman
Michael Salzman
Author LinkedIn connections

On November 28, 2016, the Federal Trade Commission announced important changes to the Premerger Notification Office's guidance on complying with Hart-Scott-Rodino Items 4(c) and 4(d).

Under the PNO's previous guidance, a filing party was not required to produce Item 4(c) and Item 4(d) documents that discuss only foreign markets because the PNO determined such documents had limited relevance to its substantive analysis. Citing the ever increasing connectedness of the global economy, however, the PNO now believes that excluding documents that concern only markets or rivals outside the U.S. could impair its ability to assess the competitive impact of a particular transaction.

Effective immediately, the PNO will require a filing party to submit all documents that are responsive to Items 4(c) and 4(d), even when those documents discuss only foreign markets. Hughes Hubbard's Antitrust & Competition Practice Group has extensive experience with HSR filings and merger analysis and would be pleased to provide guidance in applying the new rules.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from