Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 OCTOBER 2022

WTR: Lavender Wins Against ‘unfragrant' Infringer

Rouse
Explore more from Rouse

The decision brings hope to owners of unregistered GIs in Indonesia, who had feared that the new Law on Trade Marks and Geographical Indications precluded...

United KingdomIntellectual Property
Fabrice Mattei
Fabrice Mattei
Yurio Astary
Yurio Astary
Author LinkedIn connections

The decision brings hope to owners of unregistered GIs in Indonesia, who had feared that the new Law on Trade Marks and Geographical Indications precluded them from enforcing their rights in the country.

To read more of "Lavender wins against 'unfragrant' infringer", please visit WTR's website.

Co-authored with Alexandre Levy, Assistant director, Institut National de l'Origine et de la Qualité

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Samsung Ordered To Pay The Swatch Group US$11.6 Million In Damages For Trade Mark Infringement

The High Court has awarded the Swatch Group US$11.6 million in negotiation damages against Samsung for trade mark infringements involving watch face apps on the Galaxy App store. Rejecting both parties' extreme valuations of US$170 million and US$301, the court established important principles for assessing damages when brand owners don't license their marks and no comparable market royalties exist.
United KingdomIntellectual Property
Mishcon de Reya LLP
Mishcon de Reya LLP
Article

Counting The Cost Of False Association: When Does Use Of A Mark Go Beyond Information And Become Infringement?

The High Court examined whether an events company's use of prestigious brand names like VANITY FAIR and GQ on its website constituted trade mark infringement and passing off. The case centered on whether promotional references to exclusive invitation-only events crossed the line from legitimate identification to misleading consumers about a commercial connection with the trade mark owner.
United KingdomIntellectual Property
Winckworth Sherwood LLP
Winckworth Sherwood LLP
Article

UK Patents Court Reinforces The UK Threshold For Plausibility

The UK Patents Court has upheld Novartis' patent and SPC protecting Entresto, its blockbuster heart failure treatment combining valsartan and sacubitril, rejecting all validity challenges from generic manufacturer Accord Healthcare. The judgment provides crucial guidance on plausibility requirements where experimental data have been generated but not fully disclosed in the patent specification, clarifying when qualitative disclosure of positive results suffices without detailed numerical data.
United KingdomIntellectual Property
HGF Law
HGF Law
Article

EPO v UPC – Jurisdiction

Since the Unified Patent Court opened on 1 June 2023, one of the more interesting legal questions which has been considered is the matter of jurisdictional competence. Following on from our comparison of the EPO and UPC’s approaches to inventive step (available here) and as the dust begins to settle on some of the early decisions, it is a good time to reflect on the early decisions of the UPC in relation to jurisdiction and to compare the UPC with the EPO in this regard.
WorldwideIntellectual Property
Boult Wade Tennant LLP
Boult Wade Tennant LLP