Continuation vehicles are typically structured as limited partnerships, with the investors (both rolling and new) constituting limited partners in the vehicle and the GP acting as manager of the vehicle. From a regulatory perspective, this continuation vehicle will typically fall within one of two regulatory categories: an alternative investment fund ("AIF") or a non-AIF collective investment scheme ("CIS").
The AIF vs. non-AIF CIS distinction can have significant implications in terms of market access, lead times, cost, compliance burden and, in some cases, compliance uplift. The regulatory analysis applying to the continuation vehicle can therefore often be a critical early step in any CV process.
In the tenth instalment of our Talking. Secondaries series, we summarise the key concepts and some of their associated implications.
To read this article in full, please click here.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
