CISX - Exchange Reopens To Consider New Listings

The UK Supreme Court's decision in Saxon Woods v Costa establishes that directors cannot justify covert, disloyal conduct by claiming they sincerely believed they were acting in the company's best interests. This analysis examines how the ruling clarifies section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 and explores its implications for directors of Jersey companies, where article 74(1)(a) of the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991 takes a different structural approach to the same fundamental duty.

In a market shaped by higher financing costs and evolving capital partnerships, real estate sponsors are increasingly focused on structuring flexibility throughout the investment lifecycle. Against this backdrop, Jersey remains a well-established platform for international real estate investment. Its corporate and regulatory framework, including the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991 and the Jersey Private Fund (JPF) regime, combines regulatory credibility with practical structuring flexibility.

Jersey is a popular place to establish companies because the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991 (the Law) is modern, flexible and modelled on English companies legislation. This guide looks at the key things you need to know about the payment of distributions by a Jersey company (a company that is not an open ended investment company).

The Companies (Jersey) Law 1991 has undergone significant amendments to strengthen Jersey's position as a leading international financial centre. These changes introduce enhanced flexibility in share capital management, streamlined corporate governance procedures, and modernised insolvency frameworks, all designed to provide greater clarity and efficiency for companies, investors and advisers operating in this jurisdiction.

Jersey is a popular place to establish an companies because the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991 (the Law) is modern, flexible and modelled on English companies legislation.

For trustees and their advisers, geopolitical risk is no longer an abstract backdrop, it is an active force shaping client behaviour, structuring decisions, and long-term wealth strategies.

Jersey’s company law framework is now even more compelling to international markets, thanks to a number of updates.

This comprehensive guide outlines the statutory and customary law obligations that directors of Jersey companies must fulfill, including duties to act in good faith, exercise due care, and disclose conflicts of interest.

The requirements regarding how the decisions relating to a Jersey company are documented is dictated by a combination of the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991, as amended, (the "Law") and the memorandum and articles...

Jersey law enables the creation of protected cell companies (PCCs) and incorporated cell companies (ICCs), which allow for the segregation of assets and liabilities within separate cells. While PCC cells share a single legal identity with the parent company, each ICC cell operates as an independent legal entity, offering distinct advantages for structuring complex financial arrangements.

The Bermuda Monetary Authority has released a consultation paper on artificial intelligence regulation in financial services, proposing a risk-based framework that extends existing regulatory requirements rather than creating new licensing regimes. Financial institutions now face critical decisions about how to classify AI use cases, implement governance controls, and prepare for heightened scrutiny of generative and agentic AI systems before the October 30 feedback deadline.

Artificial intelligence is rapidly transforming workplace decision-making, moving from administrative tasks to influencing recruitment, performance management, and termination decisions. As employers increasingly rely on AI systems to process information and make recommendations about employees, they face growing legal risks around discrimination, transparency, and accountability. Understanding how existing privacy laws like Bermuda's PIPA apply to AI-assisted employment decisions, and implementing proper h

Senior executives from Bermuda's reinsurance market gathered in Monte Carlo to discuss the industry's current state and future challenges. While the market remains profitable with strong capital positions, participants debated whether underwriting discipline can be maintained amid softening rates and the pressure to deploy excess capital. The roundtable also explored emerging opportunities in complex risks like data centres, casualty ILS, and cyber insurance.

A Guernsey lawyer examines the rapid adoption of AI in legal compliance and risk management, exploring both the transformative potential and critical challenges of automated systems in customer due diligence, regulatory oversight, and professional judgment. Drawing on recent court cases and industry studies, the analysis questions whether current regulatory frameworks can keep pace with AI's evolution in the financial services sector.

The executor's year in Cayman Islands succession law represents a critical juncture where beneficiary expectations meet administrative realities. Does this twelve-month period impose an absolute deadline for estate completion, or does it function as a flexible measure of reasonable diligence? This analysis examines the statutory provisions, common law foundations, and practical implications of sections 5 and 7 of the Succession Act to resolve fundamental questions about representative obligations and benefi

Bermuda's private equity funds face mounting pressure as net asset values concentrate in fewer, larger portfolios while traditional exit routes remain constrained. With merger and acquisition markets uncertain and distribution droughts complicating fundraising, sponsors must navigate continuation vehicles and NAV financing as alternative liquidity solutions, each carrying distinct structural complexities and contractual implications under Bermuda's flexible partnership framework.

A BVI Court case examines whether a publicly traded company can be restrained from redomiciling to another jurisdiction when allegations of fraud and control by interested parties threaten to render enforcement of potential claims impossible. The proceedings reveal the complex interplay between corporate independence, jurisdictional authority, and the protection of alleged fraud victims in offshore litigation.

Cayman Islands and BVI companies used as listing vehicles operate under a three-tier regulatory framework comprising company law, constitutional documents, and stock exchange listing rules. This analysis examines the critical differences between Cayman and BVI company law—particularly regarding share capital structure, amendment procedures, and directors' powers—and explores how these distinctions impact the efficiency of share consolidations needed to maintain Nasdaq listing requirements.

Seychelles' Financial Services Authority has issued Circular No. 5 of 2026, targeting International Business Companies operating in regulated financial sectors—particularly virtual asset services—without proper licensing. With the IBC Amendment Bill advancing through the National Assembly and a critical ESAAMLG evaluation approaching, the FSA is signaling that passive oversight has ended and formal enforcement against non-compliant entities is imminent.

A High Court ruling examines the cross-border application of section 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986 in enforcing English arbitration awards, while establishing critical boundaries for the Marex tort in asset recovery disputes. The decision addresses whether offshore restructurings undertaken before arbitral awards can be challenged under English law when assets are allegedly moved to frustrate enforcement.