Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

VIDEO · 12 JUNE 2024

No-Fault Accident Benefits In Ontario: Explained (Video)

Gluckstein Lawyers
Explore more from Gluckstein Lawyers

No-fault accident benefits are pursued by an accident victim through their own automobile insurance (or the insurance of a driver involved in the accident). The no-fault accident benefits system...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Gluckstein Lawyers
Gluckstein Lawyers
Author LinkedIn connections

self

No-fault accident benefits are pursued by an accident victim through their own automobile insurance (or the insurance of a driver involved in the accident). The no-fault accident benefits system was designed to ensure that all motor vehicle accident victims (and certain eligible relatives) would be able to receive benefits to aid in their recovery in a timely manner. Insurance companies sometimes delay or deny these benefits unfairly.

An experienced motor vehicle accident lawyer from Gluckstein Lawyers can help you fight to get what you deserve. We know how to deal with insurers to get results so that you can focus on healing.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Spoliation: What Litigants Need To Know About Preserving Evidence

The Supreme Court of Canada has clarified the legal test for spoliation, establishing a four-part framework that litigants must understand when preserving evidence. This doctrine, rooted in ancient Roman law, creates a mandatory presumption against parties who intentionally destroy or suppress relevant evidence, with courts now empowered to impose severe but proportionate remedies based on the magnitude of the misconduct.
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Alexander Holburn Beaudin + Lang LLP
Alexander Holburn Beaudin + Lang LLP
Article

Do Canadian Manufacturers Owe A Duty To Develop Safer Alternatives?

The British Columbia Court of Appeal has left open the possibility that pharmaceutical manufacturers may owe a duty of care to develop safer alternatives to their existing products, even when those products are properly approved and labeled. This decision in Gilead Sciences, Inc. v. I.F. contrasts sharply with a recent California Supreme Court ruling that rejected such a "duty to innovate," potentially setting Canada on a divergent path in product liability law.
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Torys
Torys
Article

Ontario’s New AI Rules: What Lawyers And Expert Witnesses Need To Know

Ontario's Rules of Civil Procedure now include strict amendments requiring lawyers and expert witnesses to certify the authenticity of every citation and authority used in court materials. These new anti-hallucination provisions impose significant penalties for presenting AI-generated fabricated authorities, fundamentally shifting accountability for artificial intelligence use in litigation.
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Soloway Wright
Soloway Wright
Article

The Coldcard Exploit: Why Victims May Have Two Routes To Recovery

A five-year-old firmware defect in Coldcard hardware wallets has enabled attackers to systematically drain an estimated $116 million in Bitcoin from over 5,200 victims since July 2026. This unprecedented exploit raises critical questions about manufacturer liability and creates two distinct legal pathways for recovery: blockchain tracing against the perpetrators and potential litigation against Canadian manufacturer Coinkite for product defects that undermined the fundamental security promise of devices mar
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
WeirFoulds LLP
WeirFoulds LLP
Article

Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 25 – 29, 2026)

The Court of Appeal for Ontario issued several significant rulings during the week of May 25, 2026, addressing critical issues spanning professional regulation, defamation law, negligence liability, and commercial disputes. These decisions clarify important legal principles regarding costs awards against regulatory bodies, anti-SLAPP motion analysis, occupiers' duties to warn of hidden dangers, and enforcement of settlement agreements in various contexts.
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Blaney McMurtry LLP
Blaney McMurtry LLP
Article

Court Of Appeal Reaffirms The Limited Role Of The Courts In Charter Claims

In Cycle Toronto v Ontario (Attorney General), 2026 ONCA 582, the Ontario Court of Appeal overturned a lower court ruling preventing the government of Ontario from ripping out 19 kilometers of protected bike lines along three major Toronto roadways. The decision underlines the limited role of the courts in reviewing policy-based government decisions.
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Singleton Urquhart Reynolds Vogel LLP
Singleton Urquhart Reynolds Vogel LLP