Interest Arbitration Changes For New Brunswick Postponed For Further Study

On May 2, 2019, the Supreme Court of Canada denied leave to appeal from the Ontario Court of Appeal's decision in Lavender v Miller Bernstein LLP, 2018 ONCA 729.

In his reasons, the judge found that the delay experienced by Cavey was not caused by him or his counsel, but was the fault of the Crown and unexpected involvement...

After a collision, a good Samaritan stops and attends the scene to render assistance. He or she is injured in a subsequent collision.

The Court reviews the requirements for a Court ordered defence medical pursuant to Section 105 of the Courts of Justice Act and Rule 33 of the Rules of Civil Procedure.

In its recent decision in Richmont Mines Inc. v. Teck Resources Limited, the British Columbia Court of Appeal emphasized the strict limits on the availability of appeal for arbitral awards.

This comprehensive summary examines three significant civil appeals decided by the Court of Appeal for Ontario during the week of June 22, 2026, covering breach of contract damages and mitigation obligations, bankruptcy costs appeals, and property rights-of-way disputes. Each case presents distinct legal principles regarding summary judgment procedures, appellate jurisdiction in bankruptcy matters, and the interpretation of historical property access agreements.

The Court of Appeal for Ontario issued several significant rulings during the week of May 25, 2026, addressing critical issues spanning professional regulation, defamation law, negligence liability, and commercial disputes. These decisions clarify important legal principles regarding costs awards against regulatory bodies, anti-SLAPP motion analysis, occupiers' duties to warn of hidden dangers, and enforcement of settlement agreements in various contexts.

Susan Wortzman, partner and Director of E-Discovery, and a team of experienced authors the third edition of E-Discovery in Canada.

The defendants, having already obtained a defence physiatrist assessment, requested that the plaintiff undergo a defence orthopedic assessment to counter the orthopedic report served by the plaintiff.

The Ontario court will give procedural assistance to foreign courts, allowing foreign litigants to examine witnesses and collect evidence in Ontario by enforcing "letters of request" from foreign courts.