Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 JANUARY 2017

Arbitration – A Country Specific Q&A

Bennett Jones LLP
Bennett Jones LLP
Contributor
Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones is one of Canada’s premier business law firms. With deep experience in complex...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bennett Jones LLP

This country-specific Q&A provides an overview of the legal framework and key issues surrounding arbitration law in Canada including arbitration agreements, tribunals, proceedings as well as costs...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Bennett Jones LLP
Bennett Jones LLP
Gannon Beaulne
Gannon Beaulne
Ethan Schiff
Ethan Schiff
Author LinkedIn connections

This country-specific Q&A provides an overview of the legal framework and key issues surrounding arbitration law in Canada including arbitration agreements, tribunals, proceedings as well as costs, awards and the hot topics concerning this country at present. This Q&A is part of the global guide to Arbitration. Published by The Legal 500 / In House Lawyer.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Do Canadian Manufacturers Owe A Duty To Develop Safer Alternatives?

The British Columbia Court of Appeal has left open the possibility that pharmaceutical manufacturers may owe a duty of care to develop safer alternatives to their existing products, even when those products are properly approved and labeled. This decision in Gilead Sciences, Inc. v. I.F. contrasts sharply with a recent California Supreme Court ruling that rejected such a "duty to innovate," potentially setting Canada on a divergent path in product liability law.
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Torys
Torys
Article

Court Of Appeal Reaffirms The Limited Role Of The Courts In Charter Claims

In Cycle Toronto v Ontario (Attorney General), 2026 ONCA 582, the Ontario Court of Appeal overturned a lower court ruling preventing the government of Ontario from ripping out 19 kilometers of protected bike lines along three major Toronto roadways. The decision underlines the limited role of the courts in reviewing policy-based government decisions.
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Singleton Urquhart Reynolds Vogel LLP
Singleton Urquhart Reynolds Vogel LLP
Article

Spoliation: What Litigants Need To Know About Preserving Evidence

The Supreme Court of Canada has clarified the legal test for spoliation, establishing a four-part framework that litigants must understand when preserving evidence. This doctrine, rooted in ancient Roman law, creates a mandatory presumption against parties who intentionally destroy or suppress relevant evidence, with courts now empowered to impose severe but proportionate remedies based on the magnitude of the misconduct.
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Alexander Holburn Beaudin + Lang LLP
Alexander Holburn Beaudin + Lang LLP
Article

Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 25 – 29, 2026)

The Court of Appeal for Ontario issued several significant rulings during the week of May 25, 2026, addressing critical issues spanning professional regulation, defamation law, negligence liability, and commercial disputes. These decisions clarify important legal principles regarding costs awards against regulatory bodies, anti-SLAPP motion analysis, occupiers' duties to warn of hidden dangers, and enforcement of settlement agreements in various contexts.
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Blaney McMurtry LLP
Blaney McMurtry LLP