Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 JUNE 2018

The trans-pacific partnership: 2018 update

Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Contributor
Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth is Australia’s leading independent law firm. We provide exceptional legal...

View firm profile
Explore more from Corrs Chambers Westgarth

The strategic and economic significance of the TPP publicly reaffirmed despite US decision not to participate.

AustraliaInternational Law
Andrew Stephenson
Andrew Stephenson
Lee Carroll
Lee Carroll
Author LinkedIn connections

DOWNLOAD

Following the United States presidential election in November 2016 and President Donald Trump's decision not to participate in the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), representatives of the remaining 11 states (Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore and Vietnam) convened with the intention of bringing the TPP into force, albeit in an amended form.

Those 11 states, reportedly led by Japan, Australia and New Zealand, sought publicly to reaffirm the strategic and economic significance of the TPP.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Chambers Asia Pacific Awards 2016 Winner – Australia
Client Service Award
Employer of Choice for Gender Equality (WGEA)

See more popular content from