Professional negligence

Leading Juniors

Leading juniors are those with significant experience of key cases, strong market recognition from both peers and clients, and are seen as future candidates for silk.

1
Jay Jagasia
Guildhall Chambers
‘Jay’s drafting is fantastic. He has the ability to digest swathes of documents within a short period of time, under pressure. His understanding and knowledge of the law is stellar.’
1
Richard Whitehouse
3PB
‘Richard is a very capable barrister, who drills down into the detail to distill clear and simple advice for clients in even the most complex and high-value professional negligence disputes. Richard has a talent for getting to the nub of a case quickly, and providing excellent advice both in conference and in writing.’
1
John Dickinson
St John’s Chambers
‘John is exceptionally good on details and has a frightfully good head for figures. He can be a silent assassin.’
1
James Pearce-Smith
St John’s Chambers
‘James is thorough and meticulous. His grasp of the law is excellent and his advice is always practical.  He is reliable, good with clients and a safe pair of hands.’
2
Holly Doyle
Guildhall Chambers
 ‘Holly has fantastic attention to detail. She is able to absorb very large amounts of papers and distil out the key evidence and issue into really helpful and user-friendly drafting. Her advice is insightful and to the point. Holly is also very approachable and easy to work with.’
2
Christopher Edwards
3PB
‘Chris has a very good eye for detail and is a very able and tenacious advocate. He is also very approachable with clients and easy to work with.’
2
Joss Knight
St John’s Chambers
2
Oliver Manley
Guildhall Chambers
'Oliver's advice manages to have sufficient breadth to demonstrate a clear understanding of the issues, whilst also being able to provide it in such a way that a lay client can easily understand it. He is also efficient and effective as a barrister.'
2
Alexander Whatley
3PB
2
James Wibberley
Guildhall Chambers
‘James is a superb advocate. He is particularly adept at explaining complex points to the court in a persuasive manner. He knows when to press a point and is very strategic in his approach.’