The Legal 500

Chambers of Edward Denehan

LINCOLN'S INN, LONDON, WC2A 3NN, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 7404 5055
Fax:
Fax 020 7405 1551
DX:
314 LONDON CHANCERY LANE WC2
Web:
www.9stonebuildings.com
Email:

Elaine Palser

Tel:
Work +44 20 7404 5055
Email:
9 Stone Buildings (Chambers of Edward Denehan)

Position

Elaine Palser has a broad chancery and commercial practice. Her principal areas of practice include: (a) insolvency; (b) property; (c) commercial; and (d) private client. Elaine undertakes a wide range of drafting and advisory work. She is an experienced advocate, appearing regularly in the High Court, county courts, and tribunals, as well as in mediations. She has represented several high profile companies, banks, and private individuals. Elaine is recommended for Insolvency in the Legal 500 (2011 edition) where she is described as 'technically excellent' and 'no shrinking violet when it comes to advocacy'. Recent insolvency cases:successfully representing several football clubs in insolvency matters, including Cardiff City Football Club in its heavily publicised dispute against HMRC in 2010; acting successfully in applications for administration orders; acting successfully in applications for validation orders; advising on applications to restrain advertisement of petitions; acting successfully in applications to set aside statutory demands. Recent property cases: settling proceedings on behalf of a leading property developer for a declaration that a landlord unreasonably withheld consent to assign several leases; advising professional indemnity insurers on a potential multi-million pound claim arising from hundreds of defective appointments of LPA receivers; successfully representing a major trade company in proceedings for the forfeiture of commercial premises; advising a purchaser on the potential defective transfer of several hundred commercial properties; advising a major international bank on an ongoing basis on property matters; representing a residential property owner in an ongoing boundary dispute; ruccessfully acting in an application for a stay after execution of a warrant for possession: Mortgage Express v Da Rocha-Afodu [2007] All ER (D) 276 (Feb). Recent commercial cases: acting for a high profile individual and company in a multi-jurisdictional dispute worth over US$100 million concerning mining, joint ventures, loans, and securities; settling proceedings and representing a commercial agent in a successful mediation of a multi-million pound damages claim; acting for a partner in an ongoing dispute over the settlement of partnership accounts; settling proceedings for rectification of the register of members and directors in a fraud case; settling proceedings and acting successfully in an application for a declaration that a property transfer was void pursuant to s.423 Insolvency Act 1986; advising on the enforcement of a foreign judgment in England. Recent private client cases: advising on and settling proceedings in claims for family provision under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975; acting successfully in claims to substitute personal representatives; advising on and settling proceedings in claims to challenge the validity of wills; advising on and settling proceedings in constructive trust claims; acting successfully in deputyship applications in the Court of Protection.

Career

Called 2002, Middle Temple. Lecturer in Law (Exeter College, Oxford University) (2004-09). Elaine lectures on a wide range of subjects for her solicitors. For example, she was invited by Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP to give a lecture entitled 'Law of Property Act Receivers' to real estate, banking and restructuring lawyers. Publications include: 'Appointing administrators out of court: validity problems and retrospective administration orders' [2011] Insolvency Intelligence 24(8) 113; 'Law of Property Act Receivers' seminar (for Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer) (2009); 'The duty of care in gross negligence manslaughter' (with J Herring) [2007] CLR 24 (described by the Court of Appeal as 'an illuminating analysis' in R v Evans [2009] EWCA Crim 650); 'Shutting the door on negligence liability: Lawrence v Pembrokeshire County Council and L v Reading Borough Council' [2009] 3 CFLQ 384; 'Rectification for unilateral mistakes: how heavy is the burden of proof' [2006] LMCLQ 139; 'Equity' chapter in 'Discovering the Law', ed S Butler, Law Matters [2006]; 'Owusu v Jackson - the End for Forum Non Conveniens' [2006] 15(1) Nott LJ 32; 'Bankruptcy Petitions' [2006] SJ 150(5) 152; and 'Turning Back the Clock' (The setting aside of trustees) decisions in the light of Sieff v Fox) [2005] NLJ 1592.

Member

Chancery Bar Association.

Education

MA (Oxon); MA (Cantab); BBusSc Hons (Cape Town).

Practice Areas

Insolvency and corporate reconstruction; Property - litigation; Private client - probate, wills and family provision

Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Jersey Royal Court considers measure of damages for dilapidations claims

    In the absence of any statutory provision in Jersey addressing how dilapidations claims are to be quantified, the Royal Court's decision in JSSL v Barclays has provided some much needed guidance, particularly in circumstances where there is an acceptance that works to redress dilapidations have not been and will not be carried out.
  • English Supreme Court rules on Mistake and Hastings Bass

    On 9 May 2013 the English Supreme Court handed down a unanimous judgment on the seminal cases of Pitt-v- Holt and Futter -v- Futter , with Lord Walker's valedictory judgment conclusively resolving the English position on the rule in Hastings Bass and rescission on the ground of mistake.
  • Getting the breaks

    Shook, Hardy & Bacon currently authors the Insurance section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
  • Product liability and dietary supplements

    Shook, Hardy & Bacon currently authors the Insurance section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
  • The calm before 
the storm: are 
you prepared for 
a dawn raid?

    WilmerHale currently authors the Fraud and Corporate Crime section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
  • International shipment of waste: transporters beware

    Burges Salmon LLP currently authors the Environment and Energy section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here
  • Cyprus Shipping Industry : Business as usual. Why despite recent events Cyprus remains an internatio

    Cyprus is the third most populated island in the Mediterranean Sea. It is strategically located at the crossroads of Europe, Africa and the Middle East. Traditionally Cyprus has always been at the heart of the seafaring trade and therefore always functioned as an important centre for trade and commerce. Today as a member of the European Union it remains an optimal business base. It is one of the most attractive locations for foreign investments worldwide. Foreign companies have been given the opportunity to invest and establish business in Cyprus on equal terms with local investors as no distinction is made between foreign and Cypriot companies.
  • FOREIGN EXCHANGE OPERATIONS

    The excellent support system in combination with the ideal jurisdiction provided in Cyprus set the country in the list of the most desirable countries through which you can offer foreign exchange operations. In addition, the accession of Cyprus within the European Union and, most importantly, the extremely beneficial economic advantages available due to the low costs and the outstanding taxation, create a covetable environment for foreign investors.
  • National public order. Adoption of the Draft

    The Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of the Russian Federation (hereinafter - SCC RF) adopted by the Informative Letter No. 156 dated the 26th of February, 2013 (hereinafter - the Informative Letter) on Review of the consideration by arbitrazh courts of the cases on the implementation of the public order clause as the ground for rejection of the recognition and enforcement of the foreign court decisions and arbitral awards.
  • China Customs New Interpretation

    For many products, tariff classification can be technically complex, confusing, and subject to multiple interpretations. Often several different Harmonized System Codes ("HS Code") may seem applicable for one given product with different tariff rates. Tariff classification is indeed a process of application of customs classification rules, including customs rulings and decisions, and misclassification may trigger severe legal consequences. The sad fact is, unfortunately, that many companies rely on non-legal professionals to determine the HS Codes for imports or exports. A recent interpretation issued by the General Administration of Customs of China ("GACC") (Circular No. [2012] 495 Shu-Fa-Fa) (the "Interpretation") reinforces the process of tariff classification as a legal matter, and formulates the test as to what counts for regulatory violation if tariff classification rules are improperly applied by the importer or exporter in a given case. If the legal defense is successful, misclassification may only be treated as a non-violation misclassification, with the possible obligation to pay up additional customs duties, if any, but without administrative or criminal consequences. The Interpretation took effect as from February 1, 2013.