The Legal 500

Chambers of Mark Ellison QC

1-2 LAURENCE POUNTNEY HILL, LONDON, EC4R 0EU, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 7933 8855
Fax:
Fax 020 7929 3732
DX:
858 LONDON CITY
Email:
Web:
www.qebholliswhiteman.co.uk

Mark Ellison QC

Tel:
Work 020 7933 8855
Email:
QEB Hollis Whiteman (Chambers of Mark Ellison QC)

Position

Having worked in serious fraud for many years during his time as Treasury Counsel (appointed 1994), then First Senior Treasury Counsel (appointment ended 2008), Mark Ellison gained valuable further experience acting in high-profile terrorism, serious fraud, serious crime, corruption and public law cases. He now mixes private and public work, and has recently: defended in the first OFT prosecution for a cartel offence under the Enterprise Act 2002; advised foreign nationals on immigration, extradition and domestic crime-related matters; advised on employee and competitor fraud-related issues; advised in connection with investigations and disclosure issues; and advised the Home Office in relation to the possible admission of intercepted communications as evidence in proceedings and carried out an independent review of undercover policing and possible police corruption connected to the Stephen Lawrence case for the Home Secretary. As Treasury Counsel and Senior Treasury Counsel, he advised and acted in high-profile and complex terrorist, official secrets and other sensitive cases. His work involved: complex serious fraud connected to funding terrorism; corruption in public and private bodies; extradition; third party disclosure involving UK and foreign authorities, individuals, companies and journalists; trial secrecy and press freedom issues; contempt of court; admissibility and gathering of foreign evidence, including intercept; medical and corporate manslaughter; advice on prosecuting members of political parties for donation offences; and public, international, and domestic criminal law issues connected to the alleged illegality of the war on Iraq. He has conducted cases at all levels in the courts and has advised on and conducted a number of professional conduct cases before the General Medical Council.

Career

Called Grays Inn 1979; QC 2008. Head of Chambers QEB Hollis Whiteman. Mark Ellison was invited to become Treasury Counsel in 1994, after having advised and acted for both the defence and prosecution in a number of high-profile serious fraud cases, including Guinness and Blue Arrow; and corruption involving North Sea oil and Channel Tunnel contracts. He was appointed First Senior Treasury Counsel in 2006. Having gained extensive experience that is directly relevant to many private practice areas, his appointment as First Treasury Counsel ended in 2008.

Member

Past chairman of Bar Council remuneration and terms of work committee; Bar Council member of the Criminal Justice Council; registered with the Bar Council Public Access Directory; Public Access Bar Association (PABA).

Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Update on EU Sanctions against Russia

    On 6 December 2014, Council Regulation (EU) No 1290/2014 entered into force. This regulation is the latest in a series of regulations regarding "sectoral sanctions" against Russia.
  • Slovakia: Checkmate? New law regulates protection of employees when blowing the whistle

    So far, in Slovakia there has not been in force any regulation specifically addressing whistleblowing situations in which employees report wrongdoings, such as the commission of a crime which they learnt about in connection with the performance of their employment, work or function. Certain partial aspects related to whistleblowing have been regulated by the country's data protection, criminal and labour laws. read more
  • Croatia: A look at the Strategic Investment Projects Act One Year after Implementation

    Croatia's sixth consecutive year of recession
  • AT: Transparency International – Release of 20th annual Corruption Perceptions Index

    On 3 December 2014, Transparency International, the leading civil society organisation fighting corruption worldwide, released its 20th annual Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI). The index draws on surveys covering the views of business people, provides expert assessments, and ranks 175 countries by the perceived levels of corruption in their public sectors. The scale ranges from 0 (perceived to be highly corrupt) to 100 (perceived to be very clean). The CPI can be found under the following link .  read more...
  • Review of the Constitutional Court Decision on the Cancellation of Article 42/1 (C) of Law No. 556

    Introduction
  • Transfer and Granting of Rights under Turkish Petroleum Law: Freedom of Contract versus Regulatory R

    Especially after the drop in oil prices the companies that are in early stage of their investments have begun to get position aiming to turn into an advantageous investment and started to look to what extent the regulations allow them to transfer and grant their rights under Turkish Petroleum Law. This may be deemed also as an exit strategy for some from operational perspective as it parallels with the tendency around the world and has direct relation with oil prices. 
  • Contracting the Petroleum Operations under Turkish Petroleum Law: Scope and Limits of Liability on P

    As exception to liberty of contracting and unlike a number of other industries, Turkey's petroleum industry imposes certain obligations to petroleum right owners in contracting the conduct of the petroleum operations.  At the first glance this seems that it aims to strengthen the management of hazards by enhancing the safety however the liability imposed to petroleum right owners in case of contracting the operations still remains unclear in terms of limitation.
  • Liabilities of Primary Employer and Subcontractors in case of a Collusive Contract

    Growing economy and competitive environment in Turkey has been leading companies to seek more profitable ways to conduct their business. Therefore companies have chosen to engage in subcontracts for the purpose of reducing their costs. Yet, to serve such purpose, at some point companies have started utilizing subcontracts to limit employees' entitlements through collusive contracts. Labor Law numbered 4857 (the " Labor Law ") and Bylaw on Subcontractor dated September 27, 2008 (the " Bylaw ") regulate which services or works may be subcontracted and strictly prohibit collusive contracts. According to Article 2/7 of the Labor Law, a collusive subcontract is considered null and void. Such nullity of subcontract automatically results in primary employers being redefined as main and sole employers of employees assigned to subcontracted work. Consequently, primary employers are solely responsible for employees' rights arising from subcontracted works and technically, primary employers would not have the option to recourse to subcontractors in order to claim any compensation due to their sole responsibility.
  • Boundaries of the Turkish Competition Authority’s Investigative Powers

    Boundaries of the Turkish Competition Authority's Investigative Powers: Case Handlers vs. Personal Property
  • Potential Consequences of Acquisitions of Minority Shareholdings under Turkish Competition Law

    The acquisition of a minority shareholding may come under the Turkish Competition Authority's (" Authority ") scrutiny in two ways, mainly: 1) it may result in de facto or de jure sole or joint control, depending on the rights possessed by the minority shareholders and/or shareholding structures and past voting patterns; and 2) it may not result in control but in cross-shareholding structures amongst competitors in a concentrated market which may raise questions about coordinated effects. This article discusses the circumstances under which the abovementioned consequences may arise under Turkish competition law with references to the relevant legislation and the most noteworthy cases in this regard.