The Legal 500

Chambers of Mark Ellison QC

1-2 LAURENCE POUNTNEY HILL, LONDON, EC4R 0EU, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 7933 8855
Fax:
Fax 020 7929 3732
DX:
858 LONDON CITY
Email:
Web:
www.qebholliswhiteman.co.uk

Mark Ellison QC

Tel:
Work 020 7933 8855
Email:
QEB Hollis Whiteman (Chambers of Mark Ellison QC)

Position

Having worked in serious fraud for many years during his time as Treasury Counsel (appointed 1994), then First Senior Treasury Counsel (appointment ended 2008), Mark Ellison gained valuable further experience acting in high-profile terrorism, serious fraud, serious crime, corruption and public law cases. He now mixes private and public work, and has recently: defended in the first OFT prosecution for a cartel offence under the Enterprise Act 2002; advised foreign nationals on immigration, extradition and domestic crime-related matters; advised on employee and competitor fraud-related issues; advised in connection with investigations and disclosure issues; and advised the Home Office in relation to the possible admission of intercepted communications as evidence in proceedings and carried out an independent review of undercover policing and possible police corruption connected to the Stephen Lawrence case for the Home Secretary. As Treasury Counsel and Senior Treasury Counsel, he advised and acted in high-profile and complex terrorist, official secrets and other sensitive cases. His work involved: complex serious fraud connected to funding terrorism; corruption in public and private bodies; extradition; third party disclosure involving UK and foreign authorities, individuals, companies and journalists; trial secrecy and press freedom issues; contempt of court; admissibility and gathering of foreign evidence, including intercept; medical and corporate manslaughter; advice on prosecuting members of political parties for donation offences; and public, international, and domestic criminal law issues connected to the alleged illegality of the war on Iraq. He has conducted cases at all levels in the courts and has advised on and conducted a number of professional conduct cases before the General Medical Council.

Career

Called Grays Inn 1979; QC 2008. Head of Chambers QEB Hollis Whiteman. Mark Ellison was invited to become Treasury Counsel in 1994, after having advised and acted for both the defence and prosecution in a number of high-profile serious fraud cases, including Guinness and Blue Arrow; and corruption involving North Sea oil and Channel Tunnel contracts. He was appointed First Senior Treasury Counsel in 2006. Having gained extensive experience that is directly relevant to many private practice areas, his appointment as First Treasury Counsel ended in 2008.

Member

Past chairman of Bar Council remuneration and terms of work committee; Bar Council member of the Criminal Justice Council; registered with the Bar Council Public Access Directory; Public Access Bar Association (PABA).


London Bar

Business and regulatory crime (including global investigations)

Within: Business and regulatory crime (including global investigations) – Leading silks

Mark Ellison QC - QEB Hollis WhitemanA fantastic strategist and real team player.’

Within: Business and regulatory crime (including global investigations)

QEB Hollis Whitemanrichly deserves its reputation’ for handling corporate crime work relating to insider trading and bribery, with a stronger portfolio of prosecution work than many other sets. Mark Ellison QC prosecuted for the SFO in the 2016 Operation Tabernula trial.

[back to top]

Fraud: crime (including money laundering and asset forfeiture)

Within: Fraud: crime (including money laundering and asset forfeiture) – Leading silks

Mark Ellison QC - QEB Hollis WhitemanOne of the most experienced silks around – he’s done it all.’

[back to top]


Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Korea strengthens taxation on multi-national enterprises in 2017

    On July 28, 2016, the Ministry of Strategy and Finance (“MOSF”) announced the annual proposal to amend the tax law for 2017 (the “Proposal”). The Proposal was submitted to the National Assembly on 2 September 2016.
  • Protecting the ‘Little-Guy’ in Distributorship Arrangements in Korea

    - Enforcement Decree to the Fair Retail Agency Transactions Act
  • Single Continuous Infringement Concept and the Practice of the Turkish Competition Authority

    The concept of a single continuous infringement (" SCI ") enables competition authorities to consider a series of agreements or conducts that have the same objective to distort competition in the market as one single continuous infringement. Similar to the approach in the European Union, the Turkish Competition Authority ( Authority ) also considers this concept while assessing a case under Article 4 of Law No 4054 on the Protection of Competition of 13 December 1994 ( Law No 4054 ), which is akin to-if not the same as-Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( TFEU ).
  • Broader Interpretation Boosts Anti-Avoidance Rules

    Businesses seeking to structure cross-border transactions in ways that help them avoid paying tax are finding it more difficult as authorities worldwide step up information sharing. One such example is the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes, which is driven by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development and has 135 members. The cabinet recently approved Thailand's membership in the forum.
  • Austria: Amendments to Gas Market Model Ordinance

    The Gas Market Model Ordinance plays a major role in the Austrian gas market, as it regulates network access and the capacity management and balancing system in Austria's three market areas: the east, Tyrol and Vorarlberg. read more...
  • [South Korea] Data Privacy Legal Update

    Proposed Amendment to the Enforcement Decree of PIPA
  • Applications under the Overseas Investment Act 2005 - a practical update

    New Zealand’s overseas investment regime has been in the media spotlight in recent times. While lobbying organisations and political parties closely scrutinise the decisions of the Overseas Investment Office ( OIO ), those in the investment community have raised concerns that the regime is overly burdensome and time consuming. Against this background, there have been a number of changes in process and regulation, with further changes in the pipeline, aimed at ensuring the regime is fit for purpose. This article provides a brief overview of the regime and then looks at some of the recent and impending developments.  
  • Arbitrators’ Liability: Austrian Supreme Court Reconfirms Strict Standards

    One of the main advantages of arbitration vis-à-vis state court litigation, is that the parties are free to choose independent and highly specialised experts to decide their cases. Yet, if these experts negligently (or even deliberately) violate the duties that come with the acceptance of the appointment, the issue of liability arises. read more...
  • On Gifts, Courtesies and Other Business Amenities

    Nurlan Sholanov Partner, AEQUITAS Law Firm
  • Promissory Note Holders Not Bound by Arbitration Clause in Underlying Contract

    This update discusses the recent case of  Rals International Pte Ltd v Cassa di Risparmio di Parma e Piacenza SpA  [2016] SGCA 53 where the Singapore Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the High Court that the assignee’s claim based on a number of promissory notes did not fall within the scope of the arbitration agreement in the underlying Supply Agreement. The assignee of such notes was therefore free to litigate in the courts.