The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Chambers of Christopher Rees

20 CATHEDRAL ROAD, CARDIFF, CF11 9LJ, WALES
Tel:
Work 029 2023 2032
Fax:
Fax 029 2023 3636
DX:
141874 CARDIFF-28
Email:
Web:
www.apexchambers.net

John Ryan

Tel:
Work 029 2023 2032
Email:
Apex Chambers (Chambers of Christopher Rees)

Position

John practises in serious crime, related civil law matters, inquests, and also has a particular expertise in the law relating to firearms and firearms appeals. John has appeared in a large number of cases concerning dishonesty; including fraud, high value thefts, blackmail, money laundering, and proceeds of crime. Cases involving serious violence have included murder, attempted murder, serious section 18 OAPA cases, kidnapping, false imprisonment, and large scale violent disorder. Cases involving sexual offences have included kidnapping and rape, gang rape, male rape, indecent assaults, and bestiality. John has represented both private individuals and the police in inquests where deaths followed pollee pursuits, and has represented private individuals in actions against the police for misconduct. For firearms offences and appeals John has extensive knowledge and experience. Notable cases include: R v Cornelius (CA) [2012] a successful appeal regarding the importance of identifying the correct false representation and correctly drafting the indictment in cases of fraud; [2010] R v Chamchawala (the Blackwood Bomber), John prosecuted as junior alone against QC and junior counsel, [2010] R v Rasoul, prosecution of fraudulent dentist; [2008] R v Ben Scott Evans, John defended as junior alone against QC and junior counsel; [2008] R v Waters and Young (CA) [2008] EWCA Crim 2538, where the appropriate sentence was an immediate custodial sentence of such length that the offender would be entitled to immediate release by virtue of time in custody on remand, it was improper to impose a suspended sentence of equivalent length on the basis that the imposition of an immediate sentence would be meaningless In such circumstances; [2008] R v Pressdee (CA), where an offender had committed various offences in a five-year campaign of domestic violence, he could not be sentenced to imprisonment for public protection if the only serious specified offence might have been committed before April 4, 2005, when the Criminal Justice Act 2003 s225 came into effect; 2006 Attorney General’s Reference (No 80 of 2006) (CA), a case concerning whether a rape victim’s physical and mental conditions meant that she was an especially vulnerable person and whether full credit for the guilty plea should have been given.

Career

Called 1997; Gray’s Inn. Assistant deputy coroner for Coventry and Warwickshire (2008); CPS Grade 4 Prosecutor (Wales and Western Circuits).

Member

Criminal Bar Association.

Education

Cardiff University (LLB).


Regional Bar : Wales and Chester Circuit

Crime

Within: Crime – Leading juniors

John Ryan - Apex ChambersHighly experienced in serious sexual offence trials.

[back to top]


Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • New requirement for all issuers operating on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange

    On 10 August 2017 the Luxembourg Stock Exchange announced that all domestic and foreign issuers operating on the regulated market (Bourse de Luxembourg) or on the multilateral trading facility (Euro MTF) of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange must provide their legal entity identifier (“LEI ”) codes to the Luxembourg Stock Exchange before 15 September 2017.
  • Luxembourg law on the exploration and use of space resources entered into force

    The Luxembourg law on the exploration and use of space resources of 20 July 2017 entered into force on 2 August 2017 and placed Luxembourg among the most innovative space-oriented nations in the world.
  • VAT in the GCC – Q&A updates from the UAE Ministry of Finance

    On 9 July the United Arab Emirates (UAE) Ministry of Finance (MOF) published an update of the Value Added Tax (VAT) FAQ section of its website.
  • PRIIPs KID: The final pieces of the puzzle

    The pieces of the puzzle are finally falling into place. The long-awaited level 3 and 4 measures have been published earlier this week, half a year before the PRIIPs KID becomes compulsory.
  • MiFID II: Further guidance on product governance requirements

    Amongst the numerous topics covered by the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II), the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has decided to provide further guidance on the requirements regarding product governance through its guidelines dated 2 June 2017 which focus on the target market assessment by manufacturers and distributors of financial products.     
  • Arendt & Medernach is again the “Luxembourg Tax Firm of the Year”

    The partners of Arendt & Medernach are pleased to announce that their firm has been awarded once again the prestigious “Luxembourg Tax Firm of the Year” title during the International Tax Review’s European Tax Awards ceremony held at the Savoy Hotel in London on 18 May.
  • Signature of the Multilateral instrument – reservations made by Luxembourg

    On 7 June 2017, the official ceremony for the signing of the multilateral instrument (“MLI”) took place bringing to a close a process initiated last year when a consensus was reached on the wording of the MLI on 24 November 2016 (see also our newsflash dated 2 December 2016, available on our website www.arendt.com section Publications/Newsflash).
  • Arendt & Medernach: Luxembourg Law Firm of the Year

    Luxembourg, May 2017 – Arendt & Medernach is proud to have been named “Luxembourg Law firm of the year” both by Chambers & Partners and IFLR (International Financial Law Review). The prestigious trophies were both received in April in London at the respective ceremonies of the Chambers Europe Awards 2017 and the IFLR European Awards 2017.
  • First VAT EU case law on the cost-sharing VAT exemption

    The question of the scope of the cost-sharing VAT exemption, also referred to in the Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 as amended ("EU VAT Directive") as “Independent Groups of Persons” or “IGPs”, is currently being debated at the Court of Justice of the EU (“CJEU”) in several cases. Last Thursday marked the first milestone regarding this specific VAT exemption since the CJEU released its judgment in the case Commission v Luxembourg (C-274/15).
  • An Introduction to Corporate Guarantee

    In the UAE, the risk management activities inherent in running a corporate or investment banking business remain of crucial importance, not least because of the strong local characteristic of “name lending”, by which is meant lending or providing other banking facilities to family or other private businesses, primarily on the strength of the “name” or “names” of the proprietors standing behind the business, rather than on the strength of the asset quality and underlying credit of the particular business. Of course, in practice, there is commercial overlap between the proprietors and the companies which they own, but the credit analyses can break down where poor banking practices and procedures result in poorly constructed legal documentation and gaps in guarantee and security support documents.