The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

D Young & Co LLP

120 HOLBORN, LONDON, EC1N 2DY, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 7269 8550
Fax:
Fax 020 7269 8555
Email:
Web:
www.dyoung.com
London, Munich, Southampton

London: TMT (technology, media and telecoms)

Intellectual property
Intellectual property - ranked: tier 5

D Young & Co LLP

D Young & Co LLP's 'dedicated and careful team' has 'notable depth of insight and experience in IP' and is highlighted for its litigation expertise. The group counts a number of large corporates among its client roster and is also 'a perfect partner for cost-conscious mid-sized TMT companies'. The group benefits from its ability to handle a range of intellectual property disputes; practice head Tamsin Holman and recently promoted partner Anna Reid 'always provide solid and clear advice' on contentious trade mark, passing off, copyright, design and domain name matters; while Antony Craggs  is a name to note for patent litigation.

Practice head(s):Tamsin Holman

Other key lawyers:Anna Reid; Antony Craggs

Testimonials

'The team's strengths are its accuracy, while at the same time avoiding unnecessary formalities or 'red-tape'.'

'With a mixture of solicitors and patent attorneys, D Young is able to assist clients with all their patent prosecution, maintenance and litigation needs at very cost-effective London rates.'

'D Young & Co is very professional yet approachable and never ceases to impress with its technical knowledge and strategy in tricky situations.'

'Antony Craggs is very conscientious and friendly to work with; he has a great eye for detail.'

'Tamsin Holman and Anna Reid both stand-out from their competitors.'

'Antony Craggs loves getting right on top of the detail of a case and ensuring that nothing is missed.'

'Antony Craggs has no hesitation in squaring up to the big guns and providing his clients with strong and robust representation.'

'Antony Craggs makes addressing patent litigation much less daunting and seemingly easier.'

'Tamsin Holman and Anna Reid are highly specialised in international design and trade mark disputes, providing excellent legal and commercial to the point advice in a timely fashion.'

Key Clients

Akzonobel

Babcock International Group Plc

Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd

Fortune Brands

GKN Aerospace

Guinness World Records

Lifestyle Products LLC

Marriott Hotels

Metro Bank

Procter & Gamble

Radiator & Bathroom Gallery Ltd

Rothamsted Research

Rolex

Skechers

Takeda

Turner Entertainment Network

Wykamol Group Ltd

Work highlights

  • Acting for Munchkin in the defence of a registered and unregistered design infringement claim brought by Shnuggle relating to a baby bath, and the related counterclaim for the revocation of the relevant rights.
  • Succesfully defended Asid Reignz Enterprises against an opposition brought by EasyGroup to a UK trade mark application for the mark MR EASY for entertainment services in Class 41.
  • Acting for Guardia Gold in its claim for the infringement of its trade mark Auro by Auromoney.
  • Instructed by Wykamol in Safeguard Europe’s claim for infringement of its patent for a method of treating concrete and masonry and a counterclaim for the revocation of the patent.
  • Advised various clients in the fashion industry on the upcycling of their branded goods by third parties.

[back to top]

PATMA: Patent attorneys
PATMA: Patent attorneys - ranked: tier 1

D Young & Co LLP

D Young & Co LLP demonstrates broad sectorial strength, ranging from the telecoms, manufacturing and electronics sectors to the aerospace, biotechnology and especially the pharmaceutical sectors as key case generators. In addition to a strong patent drafting and portfolio management practice, often chosen by major international clients as well as prestigious universities and research institutes, the group impresses with its powerful UK and European opposition and appeal practice and complementary litigation offering. The team is also well versed in due diligence instructions, often acting for investment funds and venture capital players. Anthony Albutt and Kirk Gallagher direct the practice. In Southampton, physics and electronics specialist Nicholas Malden, electronic technology expert Jonathan Jackson and chemical and pharmaceutical professional Garreth Duncan are key contacts. Neil Nachshen, who focuses on biochemistry and pharmacology, is also noted. Rachel Bateman, Tamara Milton and Southampton's Alan Boyd and Cathrine McGowan made partner. Rooted in London and Southampton, the firm is continuing the expansion of its Munich office. Unless otherwise stated, all practitioners are based in London.

Practice head(s):Kirk Gallagher; Anthony Albutt

Other key lawyers:Garreth Duncan; Jonathan Jackson; Nicholas Malden; Neil Nachshen

Testimonials

'Great team, well coordinated and effective.'

'D Young & Co is very client-attentive and does exactly what it promises, which saves much of our time and effort to communicate.'

'The most professional team I have ever worked with. Excellent advice delivered in a laid back way that enables us as clients to participate in the most productive way.'

'The D Young & Co team is not only strong on patent strategy and management, but, critically for us, they have done an outstanding job of understanding our technology, products and end-use markets, and this understanding has helped them to provide directly relevant advice.'

'Anthony Albutt is very dedicated and service-minded.'

'Nicholas Malden takes a good care of client needs and is always willing to accommodate the client's requests.'

Key Clients

Allergy Therapeutics

GKN Aerospace

Juniper Networks

Lush Cosmetics

Nestlé

Oxford University Innovation Limited

Roche

Sony

Toyota Motor Corporation

Work highlights

  • Acted for Fresenius Kabi in oppositions of two high-value European patents relating to the client's biggest selling pharmaceutical product, adalimumab.
  • Successfully defended the patent relating to the dosing regimen of Teva Pharmaceutical's 40mg Copaxone product.
  • Providing successful patent prosecution services to Airspan Networks, a provider of wireless connectivity solutions for telecoms service providers, since its formation over 20 years ago.
  • Advised Wykamol on Safeguard Europe’s claim for infringement of its patent for a method of treating concrete and masonry and a counterclaim for revocation of the patent. Proceedings were commenced in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court in January 2018 and were settled the following month in February 2018.

[back to top]

PATMA: Trade mark attorneys
PATMA: Trade mark attorneys - ranked: tier 1

D Young & Co LLP

D Young & Co LLP is especially active in the fashion, luxury, pharmaceutical and consumer product sectors, but also fields a busy caseload in the sports, entertainment, and food and drink sectors. The group impresses with its longstanding experience in the management and development of key trade mark portfolios for prestigious clients, many of which also profit from the firm's powerful in-house dispute resolution practice. Additionally, the group is well versed in domain name disputes. Jeremy Pennant in Southampton directs the practice. The firm also has offices in London and Munich.

Practice head(s):Jeremy Pennant

Other key lawyers:Richard Burton; Helen Cawley; Jackie Johnson; Gemma Kirkland; Tamsin Holman; Anna Reid; Matthew Dick

Testimonials

'D Young & Co has a fantastic team of trade mark professionals who are experts in EU and UK trade mark law. They represent many large companies, so they know what in-house trade mark counsel are looking for. They provide practical solutions, and don't "over-lawyer".'

'I often point to D Young's trade mark team as the gold standard for foreign local trade mark counsel. The firm consistently provides superior and efficient business-friendly advice.'

'Responsive, clear, concise and pertinent advice.'

'The D Young & Co team is unbelievably responsive in their practice. They, of course, have an excellent grasp of the legal issues that I present to them and they deliver high-quality analysis that is easy to digest.'

'Jeremy Pennant is extremely experienced, and always provides practical, excellent advice. Matthew Dick is very thorough, and similarly, looks for a practical solution, from both a legal and business perspective.'

'Jeremy Pennant is a great resource for EU and UK trade mark practice. He and his team are very responsive and provide great, business-relevant and practical advice.'

'Jeremy Pennant's cost-effective work shows a deep understanding of trade mark law and recognition of practical and business interests that impact client decision making. His supporting team is similarly excellent.'

Key Clients

Burger King

Crockett & Jones Shoes

Exxon Mobil Corporation

Grays of Cambridge

Hard Rock International

Johnson & Johnson

Marriott Hotels

Qualcomm

Skechers

UPS

Work highlights

  • Successfully acted for Exxon Mobil Corporation in obtaining revocation of the trade mark ‘E:MOBIL’ and an award of costs in favour of the client.
  • Chosen by ZPG (Zoopla Property Group) for advice on its worldwide trade mark portfolio, including the conduct of a detailed strategic review of the entire portfolio.
  • Represented Marriott International in a number of related cancellation actions before the UKIPO, Appointed Persons, EUIPO and General Court, all ultimately resolved in favour of the client, including some which involved relative grounds based on copyright, grounds rarely relied on in EUIPO and Court of Justice proceedings.
  • Successfully defended Sky UK Limited’s EUIPO application to register the sign 'CHALLENGE' and logo.
  • Successfully defended Asid Reignz Enterprises Limited against an opposition brought by EasyGroup Limited to a UK trade mark application for the mark 'MR EASY' for entertainment services in Class 41.

[back to top]


Further information on D Young & Co LLP

Please choose from this list to view details of what we say about D Young & Co LLP in other jurisdictions.

London

Offices in London

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‚Äėcentre of life test‚Äô in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of¬† ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan ¬† [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the ‚ÄúRegulations‚ÄĚ). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess ¬†Surinder Singh ¬†cases that appear before them.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.  
  • Can Sole Representatives Be Shareholders?

    The Immigration Rules require that an applicant for a¬† sole representative visa ¬†is not ‚Äúa¬† majority shareholder in the overseas business‚ÄĚ.
  • Immigration Skills Charge - A Guide for Employers

    As a Sponsor, you may be required to pay the Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) each time you sponsor a migrant in the  Tier 2 General  or  Intra-Company Transfer (ICT) Long-term Staff  subcategory.
  • 5 FAQS about paragraph 320(11)

    In applications for entry clearance where the applicant has a negative immigration history in the UK, the application may be refused under the general grounds for refusal, which are found in part 9 of the Immigration Rules. Where an applicant has ¬†‚Äėpreviously contrived in a significant way to frustrate the intentions of the Immigration Rules‚Äô,¬† the application could be refused under paragraph 320(11). In this post we look at five frequently asked questions about paragraph 320(11).¬†
  • Multiple nationality and multiple citizenship (including dual nationality and dual citizenship)

    British nationality law permits multiple nationality and multiple citizenship, including dual nationality and dual citizenship.
  • Applying for Indefinite Leave to Remain in the Exceptional Talent or Promise Category

    The  Exceptional Talent  and Exceptional Promise categories are for individuals who are recognised leaders or emerging leaders in their field of expertise. There are a number of endorsing bodies for lots of different fields of work, including  artists and musicians ,  architects ,  digital experts ,  scientists  and  academics . While there isn’t an endorsing body for every expert, the growing list means that many individuals could enjoy the flexibility that this category has to offer. 
  • PARALLEL PROCEEDINGS ‚Äď CIVIL AND CRIMINAL

    Syedur Rahmanconsiders the factors that determine when civil proceedings can go ahead before,or at the same time as, criminal proceedings relating to the same circumstances.
  • Rights of appeal after the Immigration Act 2014

    The Immigration Act 2014 (‚Äúthe 2014 Act‚ÄĚ) reduced the circumstances in which the refusal of an immigration application will give rise to a right of appeal.¬†The¬† explanatory notes ¬†to the 2014 Act state that the Act was intended to restructure rights of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal. Previously, a right of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal existed against any of the 14 different immigration decisions listed in s.82 of the¬† Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 ¬†(‚Äúthe 2002 Act‚ÄĚ). As explained below, whether or not the refusal of an immigration application currently generates a right of appeal depends on the subject matter of the application rather than its categorisation.