The Legal 500

Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered

ONE THOMAS CIRCLE, NW, SUITE 1100, WASHINGTON, DC 20005, USA
Tel:
Work +1 202 862 5000
Fax:
Fax +1 202 429 3301
Email:
Web:
www.caplindrysdale.com
Washington DC, New York

United States

Recommendations


United States: Finance

Within Corporate restructuring (including bankruptcy), tier 6

Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered is ‘dedicated to getting the job done right, on time, and in a cost-efficient manner’ and clients assert that ‘no job is too complex for them to master’. The firm’s specialist expertise in advising official committees of asbestos claimants ensures that it is a top choice in this area, but it has a broad scope of creditor-side experience and it is also representing the union of US Airways pilots in the American Airlines bankruptcy. In New York, Elihu Inselbuch, Trevor Swett and Peter Van Lockwood are the key contacts and all are ‘excellent litigators with a keen sense of how to win bankruptcy cases at trial’.

[back to top]

Within Not-for-profit, Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered is a second tier firm,

Premier tax boutiqueCaplin & Drysdale, Chartered is ‘a real leading firm in the field of exempt organizations’, and is ‘well known in DC’. The firm’s ‘great bench’ includes former director of the IRS’ Exempt Organizations Division Marcus Owens who ‘understandably has an excellent reputation’ as ‘a leading audit and regulatory lawyer’ and has ‘unbelievable insight’ when it comes to tax controversy, as well as a strong work ethic. Douglas Varley also has a ‘very good reputation in the field’. Former IRS deputy commissioner Mark Matthews and William Klimon are also highly recommended. The firm holds a preeminent reputation among private foundations for establishment, restructuring and corporate governance issues, and is also highly active in litigation. Other clients include charities, churches and trade associations.

[back to top]

United States: Labor and employment

Within Employee benefits and executive compensation, tier 4

Washington DC-based Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered has an excellent reputation for tax-related work. Its EBEC team advises on the design and administration of qualified plans, legislative and regulatory changes, compliance with Title I of ERISA, executive compensation, health and welfare benefits, tax-exempt and governmental employer representation, financial institution and service provider counseling, and employee benefits dispute resolution, as well as representing clients before the IRS. The group’s ‘industry knowledge is outstanding’. It advised the Middle East Broadcasting Networks Inc on Affordable Care Act issues relating to its health plan. Other clients include The World Bank, SKF USA Inc, IMF and Ingersoll-Rand. The highly experienced Richard Skillman, Patricia Lewis and Joanne Youn are all recommended.

[back to top]

United States: Tax

Within Domestic tax: East Coast, tier 5

Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered has an excellent reputation for contentious tax matters and advice to tax-exempt organizations. In addition to its highly rated tax controversy practice, the domestic team is also active for high-net-worth individuals in high-profile trust and estate planning. Beth Kaufman and Michael Pfeifer are key partners with a wealth of experience in tax planning and controversy matters. The practice was boosted by the addition of trusts and estates lawyer Anne O’Brien, who joined in September 2013 from Arnold & Porter LLP. O’Brien acted as an expert witness to testify on behalf of Chevy Chase Trust with respect to trust law under the Uniform Trust Code as adopted by the District of Columbia and federal fiduciary income tax and transfer tax law. The attorneys named are all based in Washington DC.

[back to top]

Within International tax, Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered is a third tier firm,

The ‘outstanding’ team at Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered is ‘responsive’ and ‘pleasant to deal with’. The firm’s international tax practice was enhanced in October 2013 by the lateral hire of Peter Barnes, former international tax counsel for GE, and transfer pricing expert J Clark Armitage from Bingham McCutchen LLP. Patricia Gimbel Lewis heads the ‘technically strong’ and ‘personable’ team, and has notable transfer pricing expertise. Other key figures are Mark Allison and H David Rosenbloom, who has a very good reputation and extensive experience assisting multinational corporations and financial institutions across multiple jurisdictions. The highly regarded Cono Namorato is a former director of the Office of Professional Responsibility for the IRS, and Scott Michel is also recommended. The majority of attorneys are based in Washington DC.

[back to top]

Within Tax controversy, Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered is a second tier firm,

The ‘outstandingCaplin & Drysdale, Chartered is ‘among the best in the country’; with a deep bench of experienced lawyers in Washington DC and New York, it is ‘very responsive’, ‘pleasant to deal with’ and ‘value for money’, and represents high-profile clients across the spectrum of tax controversy matters. The ‘technically strong’ Scott Michel leads the practice, and other key partners include the ‘personable’ Mark Matthews and ‘very smart’ Mark Allison. Charles Ruchelman is leading the firm’s representation of American International Group in litigation in the US Court of Federal Claims, relating to payment of over $30m in interest derived from a tax overpayment for the 1991 tax year. The firm also continues to assist numerous US citizens and residents across the world in compliance issues arising from failures to report foreign bank accounts, foreign trusts, and foreign businesses.

[back to top]


Further information on Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered

Please choose from this list to view details of what we say about Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered in other jurisdictions.

United States

Offices in Washington DC and New York

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Update on EU Sanctions against Russia

    On 6 December 2014, Council Regulation (EU) No 1290/2014 entered into force. This regulation is the latest in a series of regulations regarding "sectoral sanctions" against Russia.
  • Slovakia: Checkmate? New law regulates protection of employees when blowing the whistle

    So far, in Slovakia there has not been in force any regulation specifically addressing whistleblowing situations in which employees report wrongdoings, such as the commission of a crime which they learnt about in connection with the performance of their employment, work or function. Certain partial aspects related to whistleblowing have been regulated by the country's data protection, criminal and labour laws. read more
  • Croatia: A look at the Strategic Investment Projects Act One Year after Implementation

    Croatia's sixth consecutive year of recession
  • AT: Transparency International – Release of 20th annual Corruption Perceptions Index

    On 3 December 2014, Transparency International, the leading civil society organisation fighting corruption worldwide, released its 20th annual Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI). The index draws on surveys covering the views of business people, provides expert assessments, and ranks 175 countries by the perceived levels of corruption in their public sectors. The scale ranges from 0 (perceived to be highly corrupt) to 100 (perceived to be very clean). The CPI can be found under the following link .  read more...
  • Review of the Constitutional Court Decision on the Cancellation of Article 42/1 (C) of Law No. 556

    Introduction
  • Transfer and Granting of Rights under Turkish Petroleum Law: Freedom of Contract versus Regulatory R

    Especially after the drop in oil prices the companies that are in early stage of their investments have begun to get position aiming to turn into an advantageous investment and started to look to what extent the regulations allow them to transfer and grant their rights under Turkish Petroleum Law. This may be deemed also as an exit strategy for some from operational perspective as it parallels with the tendency around the world and has direct relation with oil prices. 
  • Contracting the Petroleum Operations under Turkish Petroleum Law: Scope and Limits of Liability on P

    As exception to liberty of contracting and unlike a number of other industries, Turkey's petroleum industry imposes certain obligations to petroleum right owners in contracting the conduct of the petroleum operations.  At the first glance this seems that it aims to strengthen the management of hazards by enhancing the safety however the liability imposed to petroleum right owners in case of contracting the operations still remains unclear in terms of limitation.
  • Liabilities of Primary Employer and Subcontractors in case of a Collusive Contract

    Growing economy and competitive environment in Turkey has been leading companies to seek more profitable ways to conduct their business. Therefore companies have chosen to engage in subcontracts for the purpose of reducing their costs. Yet, to serve such purpose, at some point companies have started utilizing subcontracts to limit employees' entitlements through collusive contracts. Labor Law numbered 4857 (the " Labor Law ") and Bylaw on Subcontractor dated September 27, 2008 (the " Bylaw ") regulate which services or works may be subcontracted and strictly prohibit collusive contracts. According to Article 2/7 of the Labor Law, a collusive subcontract is considered null and void. Such nullity of subcontract automatically results in primary employers being redefined as main and sole employers of employees assigned to subcontracted work. Consequently, primary employers are solely responsible for employees' rights arising from subcontracted works and technically, primary employers would not have the option to recourse to subcontractors in order to claim any compensation due to their sole responsibility.
  • Boundaries of the Turkish Competition Authority’s Investigative Powers

    Boundaries of the Turkish Competition Authority's Investigative Powers: Case Handlers vs. Personal Property
  • Potential Consequences of Acquisitions of Minority Shareholdings under Turkish Competition Law

    The acquisition of a minority shareholding may come under the Turkish Competition Authority's (" Authority ") scrutiny in two ways, mainly: 1) it may result in de facto or de jure sole or joint control, depending on the rights possessed by the minority shareholders and/or shareholding structures and past voting patterns; and 2) it may not result in control but in cross-shareholding structures amongst competitors in a concentrated market which may raise questions about coordinated effects. This article discusses the circumstances under which the abovementioned consequences may arise under Turkish competition law with references to the relevant legislation and the most noteworthy cases in this regard.