The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Sullivan & Cromwell LLP

125 BROAD STREET, NEW YORK 10004-2498, USA
Tel:
Work +1 212 558 4000
Fax:
Fax +1 212 558 3588
Email:
Web:
www.sullcrom.com

Yvonne Quinn

Sullivan & Cromwell LLP

Position

Partner since 1984. Co-head, Antitrust Group. Antitrust litigation, merger analysis/review and counseling work as well as general commercial litigation. Clients: consumer products companies, leading commercial banks, equity funds, investment banks, insurance companies, cable television operators, television programming suppliers, newspapers, publishers, sports franchise owners, advertising sales, healthcare, pharmaceutical and chemical companies, accounting standards boards, among many others.

Member

ABA (Antitrust Section). NYSBA (Executive Committee, Antitrust Section). New York City Bar Association (former Chair, Antitrust and Trade Regulation Committee). FBC.

Education

University of Michigan Law School (JD, 1976); University of Michigan (MA, Economics, 1977); University of Illinois (BA, 1973).


United States: Antitrust

Civil litigation/class actions

Within: Civil litigation/class actions

Sullivan & Cromwell LLP’s lawyers are noted for their broad-ranging antitrust expertise, which spans merger matters, criminal investigations and all types of litigation. Financial services is a real sector strength, as demonstrated by the fact that a cross-office team of New York and Washington DC attorneys led by David Braff, Amanda Flug Davidoff, practice co-head Yvonne Quinn and Penny Shane is representing multiple banks, including Barclays and Goldman Sachs, in the many class actions filed against primary dealers in the US treasuries market alleging a conspiracy to manipulate prices. In Los Angeles, Robert Sacks is defending BP in an MDL alleging that several oil companies participated in a conspiracy to manipulate the price of Brent crude oil and Brent crude oil futures by providing fixed pricing information to a publisher of benchmark price assessments.

[back to top]

Merger control

Within: Merger control

Sullivan & Cromwell LLP shows ‘commercial understanding’ and brings ‘real strength of experience in US merger requirements’. Operating out of offices in New York, Washington DC, Los Angeles and Palo Alto, the team handles matters in all areas of antitrust. In the merger clearance arena, Steven Holley represented Kraft in its merger agreement with Heinz, a transaction worth $55bn. He also acted for Alcatel-Lucent in its acquisition by Nokia. Yvonne Quinn assisted Bright House Networks in its pending three-way merger agreement with Charter Communications and Time Warner Cable in order to create an $80bn cable company.

[back to top]


Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Innovation & Thailand 4.0: Value Creation for Business using Trade Secrets

    Thailand 4.0 stands for the new stage to transform the country currently relying on heavy industries (3.0 stage) into a creativity and innovation-driven economy. Trade secrets are definitively value-based and could help pursing Thailand 4.0.
  • Novelties Introduced by the Movable Pledge Law

    As of January 1, 2017, Law No. 6750 on Pledge over Movable Assets in Commercial Transactions (“Movable Pledge Law “), which was enacted on October 20, 2016, entered into force and abolished Law No.1447 on Commercial Enterprise Pledge (“Commercial Enterprise Pledge Law “). The Movable Pledge Law introduces significant changes and offers more practical methods for establishing pledge over movable assets as explained below.
  • Determination of Injury in Anti-Dumping Investigations: Turkey’s Side of the Story

    I - Introduction
  • Tax evasion: Only voluntary disclosure affords protection from severe penalties

    Anyone who has been caught for tax evasion should expect to be faced with severe penalties. Voluntary disclosure is the only way of returning to a state of normal tax affairs and avoiding penalties.
  • Turkish Health PPP Projects

    The Turkish health sector has undergone major reforms over the past ten years as part of the health transformation program. The most important pillar of such program has been the development of public-private partnership (“PPP ”) model health campus projects. More than twenty health campus projects with an investment amount of more than € 10 billion have been developed through PPP model in Turkey. They are currently at different stages ranging from tendering to operation, and more than ten health PPP projects are still in the pipeline.
  • Infrastructure REIC: An Alternative Source of Funding for Infrastructure Projects

    With the start of operation in certain BOT and other PPP model infrastructure projects in Turkey, refinancing alternatives have become more attractive and diversified. Capital market instruments and institutions are likely to have a greater share in the refinancings of projects which have become operational and the construction risks have been removed. Over the last few years, the use of capital market instruments in the infrastructure financings have gained a new impetus with the introduction of various incentives and financing solutions in this aspect. Most recently, the removal of the 1/3 and 1/5 bond issuance limits for healthcare PPP projects on 18 February 2017 represented an important step towards incentivizing the use of bonds in the healthcare sector. In line with this overall strategy, the government has also adopted various measures to make the Real Estate Investment Companies (“REICs ”) more attractive for the financing/refinancing of infrastructure projects such as BOT, BLT and other PPP projects.
  • Ankara-Niğde Highway Project

    Tender process for 330 km Ankara-Niğde Highway Project has been launched by the General Directorate of Highways upon publication of the tender announcement in the Official Gazette on December 30, 2016.
  • Establishment of the Natural Gas Spot Market in Turkey

    In line with the government’s objectives to make Turkey a regional hub for natural gas trading, a natural gas spot market has been established by the Natural Gas Organized Wholesale Market Regulation published in the Official Gazette on 31 March 2017.
  • Philippine Court of Appeals Denies Issuance of Environmental Protection Order Against Mining Company

    In a decision issued on March 8, 2017, the Philippine Court of Appeals (CA) denied the petition by NGO Ang Aroroy ay Alagaan, Inc. and certain individuals, for the issuance of a writ of kalikasan against Filminera Resources Corporation, and its directors and officers. The petitioners have claimed that Filminera, which operates in the Philippine province of Masbate, had been causing environmental damage in the conduct of its mining operations in violation of local law, and that a writ of kalikasan should be issued.
  • LIS ALIBI PENDENS UNDER THE COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) NO 44/2001 ON JURISDICTIONAND THE RECOGNITION AN

    Lis Alibi pendens is Latin for ‘suit pending elsewhere .’ Both Articles 27 and 28 of the EU Regulation 44/2001 regulate the existence of lis alibi pendens and related judicial actions. In particular it is a doctrine that regulates the jurisdictional relationship of courts hearing concurrent proceedings involving the same or related causes of action between the same parties pending in the courts of different Member States.