The Legal 500

ABC TOWER, 6TH FLOOR, WAIYAKI WAY, PO BOX 40034, 00100 NAIROBI, KENYA
Tel:
Work +254 20 429 7000
Fax:
Fax +254 20 444 8907
Web:
www.daly-figgis.com
Email:

Ashwini Bhandari

Tel:
Work +2542 310304
Email:
Daly & Figgis Advocates

Work Department

Corporate & Commercial.

Position

Partner in Corporate/Commercial Department. Undertakes a wide variety of corporate/commercial matters ranging from acquisitions, disposals, joint ventures, capital market transactions, company restructuring, has acted for both local and international companies in their acquisitions and disposal of shares and assets and joint ventures; more recent transactions include advising on the proposed privatization of Agro Chemical Industries Limited, undertaking due diligence on Kenya Electricity Generation Company for KPMG the consultants engaged on the proposed financing of the company, acting for Safaricom on their acquisition of One Communications Limited, advising on various direct foreign investment in Kenya.

Career

Admitted English Solicitor 1984, Kenyan Advocate 1998, Assistant Solicitor in the Legal Department of British Coal Corporation 1985 and subsequently with Nabarro Nathanson Solicitors until 1991; Head of Legal Affairs at Polygram Film International Limited from 1992 to 1995; subsequently moved to Kenya and joined Daly & Figgis Advocates in August 1998 as an associate and subsequently became a Partner in firm in January 2001.

Member

Law Society of Kenya, Law Society of England and Wales and Institute of Certified Public Secretaries of Kenya.

Education

1979-1980 City of London University Law Society Solicitors Final Examination 1976-1979 City of London University B.A (Hons) Law 1975-1976 Bosworth College, Desford Leicestershire A Levels.

Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Jersey Royal Court considers measure of damages for dilapidations claims

    In the absence of any statutory provision in Jersey addressing how dilapidations claims are to be quantified, the Royal Court's decision in JSSL v Barclays has provided some much needed guidance, particularly in circumstances where there is an acceptance that works to redress dilapidations have not been and will not be carried out.
  • English Supreme Court rules on Mistake and Hastings Bass

    On 9 May 2013 the English Supreme Court handed down a unanimous judgment on the seminal cases of Pitt-v- Holt and Futter -v- Futter , with Lord Walker's valedictory judgment conclusively resolving the English position on the rule in Hastings Bass and rescission on the ground of mistake.
  • Getting the breaks

    Shook, Hardy & Bacon currently authors the Insurance section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
  • Product liability and dietary supplements

    Shook, Hardy & Bacon currently authors the Insurance section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
  • The calm before 
the storm: are 
you prepared for 
a dawn raid?

    WilmerHale currently authors the Fraud and Corporate Crime section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
  • International shipment of waste: transporters beware

    Burges Salmon LLP currently authors the Environment and Energy section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here
  • Cyprus Shipping Industry : Business as usual. Why despite recent events Cyprus remains an internatio

    Cyprus is the third most populated island in the Mediterranean Sea. It is strategically located at the crossroads of Europe, Africa and the Middle East. Traditionally Cyprus has always been at the heart of the seafaring trade and therefore always functioned as an important centre for trade and commerce. Today as a member of the European Union it remains an optimal business base. It is one of the most attractive locations for foreign investments worldwide. Foreign companies have been given the opportunity to invest and establish business in Cyprus on equal terms with local investors as no distinction is made between foreign and Cypriot companies.
  • FOREIGN EXCHANGE OPERATIONS

    The excellent support system in combination with the ideal jurisdiction provided in Cyprus set the country in the list of the most desirable countries through which you can offer foreign exchange operations. In addition, the accession of Cyprus within the European Union and, most importantly, the extremely beneficial economic advantages available due to the low costs and the outstanding taxation, create a covetable environment for foreign investors.
  • National public order. Adoption of the Draft

    The Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of the Russian Federation (hereinafter - SCC RF) adopted by the Informative Letter No. 156 dated the 26th of February, 2013 (hereinafter - the Informative Letter) on Review of the consideration by arbitrazh courts of the cases on the implementation of the public order clause as the ground for rejection of the recognition and enforcement of the foreign court decisions and arbitral awards.
  • China Customs New Interpretation

    For many products, tariff classification can be technically complex, confusing, and subject to multiple interpretations. Often several different Harmonized System Codes ("HS Code") may seem applicable for one given product with different tariff rates. Tariff classification is indeed a process of application of customs classification rules, including customs rulings and decisions, and misclassification may trigger severe legal consequences. The sad fact is, unfortunately, that many companies rely on non-legal professionals to determine the HS Codes for imports or exports. A recent interpretation issued by the General Administration of Customs of China ("GACC") (Circular No. [2012] 495 Shu-Fa-Fa) (the "Interpretation") reinforces the process of tariff classification as a legal matter, and formulates the test as to what counts for regulatory violation if tariff classification rules are improperly applied by the importer or exporter in a given case. If the legal defense is successful, misclassification may only be treated as a non-violation misclassification, with the possible obligation to pay up additional customs duties, if any, but without administrative or criminal consequences. The Interpretation took effect as from February 1, 2013.