The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon
Work 020 8800 6464
Fax 020 8800 6066

Karen May

Work 020 8800 6464
John Ford Solicitors


Karen May has over 18 years’ experience in education law and community care. Qualifying in 1997, Karen worked for a local authority before joining John Ford Solicitors in 1999 where she became particularly involved with children’s rights. Representing individuals, local authorities and schools, Karen specialises in judicial review cases, particularly concerning Community Care and Education Law. She has acted in many leading Education Law Judicial Review cases in the High Court and the Court of Appeal, concerning vulnerable children. Karen also provides advice and legal representation for many Court of Protection clients, obtaining positive results for the most vulnerable. Areas of specialism: Education law, community care, public and administrative law, court of protection, discrimination. Important cases: The Governing Body of C Girls’ Academy (2015) Judicial review proceedings were issued when the Academy unlawfully sought to compel the complainant to complete the last two years of her education at a PRU type placement. Proceedings were settled with the Academy agreeing for the claimant to go back to resume her education in the usual way on the school site; R (on the application of JE) v Sheffield County Council 2014. Public Law -Judicial Review concerning an overlap between special educational needs and community care law. The claimant was extremely vulnerable having autism, ADHD and ODD as well as an attachment disorder. The case focused upon the failures in relation to the Statement of Special Educational Needs and the failures to produce a lawful care plan under section 17 of the Children act 1989.Excellent provision was secured for the claimant at a specialist independent school as well as respite arrangements and a costs order in the claimant’s favour; R (on the application of JF) v LB Hackney 2014 Court of Protection proceedings. This was a very complex case with a background of judicial review proceedings to obtain community care services where the President became concerned about the lack of progress; G v West Herts College 2014. This case involved disability discrimination against a young man with Downs Syndrome. Proceedings were issued and sensitive negotiations led to a settlement for damages; R (DD) v Independent Appeal Panel of the L.B. Islington (2013) ELR 483. (Admissions Infant Class Sizes). This case concerns the approach panels need to take where ‘future infant class size prejudice’ is put forward by the admissions authority; R (on the application of JF)-v-L B Hackney [2010] EWHC 3130 (Inadequacy of care plan) JF suffers from severe autism and the case concerned the legal requirements for a lawful care plan. The care plan was inadequate and lacked the degree of specificity required by case law.


Trained Hertfordshire County Council; qualified 1997; responsible for advising Hertfordshire LEA and schools 1996; associate solicitor John Ford Solicitors 1999.


Education Law Association.

London: Public sector

Education: individuals

Within: Education: individuals

John Ford Solicitors’ ‘knowledgeable’ team has ‘a wealth of experience’. It recently acted in judicial review proceedings pertaining to the failure to comply with an EHC plan under the Children and Families Act 2014. The ‘pragmaticKaren May acts for individuals in judicial review cases, particularly at the interface between education and community care law. Also recommended are John Ford, who has ‘an excellent legal brain’, and ‘sharp and resourceful’ associates Marian Shaughnessy and Helen Gill.

[back to top]

Back to index

Legal Developments in London

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • The legal difference between a consultant and an employee according to Nicaraguan Law

    Knowing the legal difference between a consultant and an employee is important for a company that needs to hire someone in Nicaragua or for a person interested in rendering services for a company or another person, due to the fact that the nature of the contractual relationship will determine many factors that both parties must be aware of before executing the contracting modality that will govern the relationship between them - the nature of the contractual relationship impacts on the employment benefits, tax implications and liabilities that the parties must comply with according to the law.  labor_law_in_nicaragua
  • Single director - shareholder Companies according to the Nicaraguan legal system

    What is a Single Shareholder and Director legal entity?
  • Business in Nicaragua- The Most Important Changes in the Recent Tax Reform

    In recent years, the country ́s the government has been committed to improving Taxation in Nicaragua and attempting to follow the legislative model used by some of the other countries in the region. Starting January 1st, 2013, a new tax law (Law No. 822, Tax Concertation Law) came into force in and completely changed the taxation system in Nicaragua. Two years later a new law was issued by the National Assembly containing more than 80 amendments, additions and repeals (Law No 891) which came into force December 18th, 2014.