The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon
Work 01908 262680
Fax 01908 262022

South East: Private client

Family: Beds, Bucks, Herts, Middx
Family: Beds, Bucks, Herts, Middx - ranked: tier 2

Hawkins Family Law

Established in 2001 as a niche family law firm, Hawkins Family Law has been consolidating its reputation in the Milton Keynes area thanks to its in-depth experience and technical abilities. In particular, the team is known for its strength in dispute resolution. The practice’s expertise includes financial matters (often involving assets across multiple jurisdictions), high-value ancillary relief, co-habitation issues and complex children cases. Jo Hawkins heads the practice. Loraine Davenport, Annabel Hayward and associate Stacey St Clair are other names to note.

Practice head(s):Jo Hawkins

Other key lawyers:Loraine Davenport; Annabel Hayward; Stacey St Clair


'The Hawkins Family Law team exemplify everything you want to see in a progressive and forward-thinking law firm'.

'They foster a rapport with clients which helps support people who are invariably undergoing difficult circumstances'.

'Very capable family law practice with a genuine humanity alongside quality legal advice'.

'Very approachable and professional. Quick to respond to questions'.

'Jo Hawkins is extremely knowledgeable and delivers her advice in an easily understandable and compassionate way'.

'Loraine Davenport is a fearless lawyer'.

'Stacey St Clair is easy to talk to and gives excellent advice and alternative solutions'.

'Stacey made my divorce process easy to manage and I trusted her advice completely'.

Work highlights

  • Advised on family matter spanning children and financial issues.
  • Advised on an ancillary relief claim.
  • Advised on a high-net-worth divorce case.
  • Handled a private law children case.
  • Acting for a wife in divorce and financial negotiations.
Leading individuals

Jo Hawkins - Hawkins Family Law

Rising stars

Stacey St Clair - Hawkins Family Law

[back to top]

Further information on Hawkins Family Law

Please choose from this list to view details of what we say about Hawkins Family Law in other jurisdictions.

South East

Offices in Milton Keynes

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‚Äėcentre of life test‚Äô in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of¬† ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan ¬† [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the ‚ÄúRegulations‚ÄĚ). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess ¬†Surinder Singh ¬†cases that appear before them.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.  
  • Can Sole Representatives Be Shareholders?

    The Immigration Rules require that an applicant for a¬† sole representative visa ¬†is not ‚Äúa¬† majority shareholder in the overseas business‚ÄĚ.
  • Immigration Skills Charge - A Guide for Employers

    As a Sponsor, you may be required to pay the Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) each time you sponsor a migrant in the  Tier 2 General  or  Intra-Company Transfer (ICT) Long-term Staff  subcategory.
  • 5 FAQS about paragraph 320(11)

    In applications for entry clearance where the applicant has a negative immigration history in the UK, the application may be refused under the general grounds for refusal, which are found in part 9 of the Immigration Rules. Where an applicant has ¬†‚Äėpreviously contrived in a significant way to frustrate the intentions of the Immigration Rules‚Äô,¬† the application could be refused under paragraph 320(11). In this post we look at five frequently asked questions about paragraph 320(11).¬†
  • Multiple nationality and multiple citizenship (including dual nationality and dual citizenship)

    British nationality law permits multiple nationality and multiple citizenship, including dual nationality and dual citizenship.
  • Applying for Indefinite Leave to Remain in the Exceptional Talent or Promise Category

    The  Exceptional Talent  and Exceptional Promise categories are for individuals who are recognised leaders or emerging leaders in their field of expertise. There are a number of endorsing bodies for lots of different fields of work, including  artists and musicians ,  architects ,  digital experts ,  scientists  and  academics . While there isn’t an endorsing body for every expert, the growing list means that many individuals could enjoy the flexibility that this category has to offer. 

    Syedur Rahmanconsiders the factors that determine when civil proceedings can go ahead before,or at the same time as, criminal proceedings relating to the same circumstances.
  • Rights of appeal after the Immigration Act 2014

    The Immigration Act 2014 (‚Äúthe 2014 Act‚ÄĚ) reduced the circumstances in which the refusal of an immigration application will give rise to a right of appeal.¬†The¬† explanatory notes ¬†to the 2014 Act state that the Act was intended to restructure rights of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal. Previously, a right of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal existed against any of the 14 different immigration decisions listed in s.82 of the¬† Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 ¬†(‚Äúthe 2002 Act‚ÄĚ). As explained below, whether or not the refusal of an immigration application currently generates a right of appeal depends on the subject matter of the application rather than its categorisation.