The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon


Work 020 7839 0278
Fax 020 7839 8212
Hempsons, Janice Barber, London, ENGLAND

Janice Barber

Work 020 7484 7501

Work Department



Hempsons’ senior partner, Janice Barber has experience in many areas of healthcare law; specialises in regulatory and employment law, data protection and information law. Leading cases in which Janice has been involved include R v Cox [1992], manslaughter, euthanasia, acting for the defendant; Howard v Dorset Health Authority [1993], hospital negligence, applicability of res ipsa loquitur principle in clinical negligence cases, for the defendant; Thomson v Black-James CA [1997], re foreseeability; Gryf-Lowczowski v Hinchingbrooke Healthcare NHS Trust [2005] EWHC 2407 (HCL) QB; Stanley Royd Hospital Inquiry, led to the lifting of Crown Immunity for the NHS 1984; Orkney Child Abuse Inquiry [1991]; defended Mr Ledward in HC(90)0 GMC proceedings and prosecuted Mr Steven Walker Blackpool; United Leeds Hospital v Duncan Walker [1997], inquiry under HSG(95)25 and subsequent appeal to the Secretary of State; 2000 BSE inquiry; 2004, the mid Staffordshire inquiry 2013; and the vale of levan inquiry 2013. She was a member of the Chief Medical Officer’s Revalidation Advisory Group, which led to the publication of ‘Good Doctors, Safer Patients – proposals to strengthen the system to assure and improve the performance of doctors and to protect the safety of patients’ (2007) and a member of the Department of Health Working Party on Tackling Concerns Locally, sitting on the sub-group which reviewed the Performers Lists and chairing the Information Management sub-group, and is currently chair of NHS England's stakeholder vergence group, addressing issues in relation to medical revalidation.


Articled Hempsons; qualified 1983; partner Hempsons since 1984; currently seminars and lectures in all her specialist areas of practice.


University of Reading (1978 BA Hons first class); UCL (postgraduate diploma in employment law); King’s College, London (2005 postgraduate diploma in European law).

Back to index

Legal Developments in London

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • The legal difference between a consultant and an employee according to Nicaraguan Law

    Knowing the legal difference between a consultant and an employee is important for a company that needs to hire someone in Nicaragua or for a person interested in rendering services for a company or another person, due to the fact that the nature of the contractual relationship will determine many factors that both parties must be aware of before executing the contracting modality that will govern the relationship between them - the nature of the contractual relationship impacts on the employment benefits, tax implications and liabilities that the parties must comply with according to the law.  labor_law_in_nicaragua
  • Single director - shareholder Companies according to the Nicaraguan legal system

    What is a Single Shareholder and Director legal entity?
  • Business in Nicaragua- The Most Important Changes in the Recent Tax Reform

    In recent years, the country ́s the government has been committed to improving Taxation in Nicaragua and attempting to follow the legislative model used by some of the other countries in the region. Starting January 1st, 2013, a new tax law (Law No. 822, Tax Concertation Law) came into force in and completely changed the taxation system in Nicaragua. Two years later a new law was issued by the National Assembly containing more than 80 amendments, additions and repeals (Law No 891) which came into force December 18th, 2014.