The Legal 500

HANOVER HOUSE, 14 HANOVER SQUARE, LONDON, W1S 1HP, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 7667 5000
Fax:
Fax 020 7667 5100
DX:
44617 MAYFAIR
Web:
www.harbottle.com
Email:

Robert Reilly

Tel:
Work +44 20 7667 5000
Email:
Harbottle & Lewis LLP

Work Department

Property group

Position

Partner in the property group; handling capital projects for developers, investors and occupiers; acting on behalf of private property companies and charities; the work involves planning and development agreements, conditional contracts and commercial leases.

Career

Articled London Borough of Richmond upon Thames; qualified 1985; partner with Harbottle & Lewis 1989 to date; current directorships/trusteeships: Margaret Ramsey Ltd; the New Orange Tree Theatre Trust; and the Rufford Foundation.

Member

Law Society.

Education

Royal Belfast Academical Institution; University of Bristol (1981 LLB).

Leisure

Family, running, cycling, skiing, theatre, films.

Practice Areas

Charities and not-for-profit; Planning; Property - commercial property

Back to index

Legal Developments by:
Harbottle & Lewis LLP

  • Account of profits v damages: when and why does it matter?

    Since 2007, Experience Hendrix LLC(Hendrix) and Times Newspapers Ltd (Times) have been litigating over the intellectual property rights (IPR) in a recording of a Jimi Hendrix concert that took place at the Royal Albert Hall in February 1969. In September 2006 Times distributed a free CD, or covermount, with each edition of The Sunday Times . A claim was issued against Times in March 2007 for infringement of copyright and performers’ rights under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. In March 2008 the High Court held that Times had infringed the IPR in the recording and Hendrix elected to have an inquiry as to damages in respect of that infringement. The case has given rise to some complex issues as to the basis for the quantification of damages, and the inquiry is due to be heard next year, but the case is also a reminder of more general considerations in relation to remedies in IPR cases, and why the basis for quantification of those remedies can have far reaching consequences for a successful claimant.

    - Harbottle & Lewis LLP

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to