Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Ukraine > Intellectual property > Law firm and leading lawyer rankings


Index of tables

  1. Intellectual property
  2. Leading individuals
  3. Next generation lawyers

Next generation lawyers

  1. 1

Who Represents Who

Find out which law firms are representing which Intellectual property clients in Ukraine using The Legal 500's new comprehensive database of law firm/client relationships. Instantly search over 925,000 relationships, including over 83,000 Fortune 500, 46,000 FTSE350 and 13,000 DAX 30 relationships globally. Access is free for in-house lawyers, and by subscription for law firms. For more information, contact


Aequo’s team has a ‘great understanding of every aspect of IP’. ‘Strategic litigatorOleksandr Mamunya handled a number of matters for MTS, including trade mark disputes.

At Baker McKenzie, Kyiv Office, Ruslan Drobyazko handled an anti-counterfeiting campaign for a multinational oil and gas company. Senior associates Oleksiy Stolyarenko and Yuliya Kolchenko are ‘clear, concise and practical’.

DLA Piper Ukraine LLCprovides an excellent service’, in part due to the presence of Natalia Pakhomovska, who handled litigation and IP protection for an international tobacco company. Natalia Kirichenko is also recommended.

Doubinsky & Osharova is ‘a leading IP firm’. Yaroslav Ognevyuk advised Amstor on the invalidation of contracts for trade mark transfer. Michael Doubinsky, Irina Osharova and Tatyana Shpakovich are also noted.

Egorov Puginsky Afanasiev & Partners’ team ‘works diligently to solve problems’. Taras Kyslyy is ‘a creative’ litigator. Clients include Viacom.

IPStyle’s ‘smart’ Mariya Ortynska advised Danone Ukraine on IP rights management.

Ilyashev & Partners’s Irina Kirichenko is known for her ‘innovative ideas’ and litigator Mariia Koval provides ‘exceptional service’. Clients include Megainpharm.

Mikhailyuk, Sorokolat & Partners’ team successfully reversed a refusal to protect an international trade mark in former Soviet states. It is a market leader in terms of number of patents, trade marks and designs registered. Valentin Mikhailyuk and Anna Mikhailyuk are noted.

Pakharenko & Partners advised tyre manufacturer Michelin on IP rights protection. Antonina Pakharenko-Anderson, Alexander Pakharenko and Elena Shamrina are recommended.

Sayenko Kharenko’s Nazar Chernyavsky advised Novomatic on IP enforcement matters against casinos. Oleksandr Padalka is also noted.

The ‘outstandingArzinger includes Kateryna Oliinyk and Timur Bondaryev, who handled IP infringement matters for Grand River Enterprises. Anton Polikarpov left the firm.

Asters is ‘very responsive’. ‘Wonderful negotiatorJulia Semeniy represented Ferrero in a dispute concerning the unauthorised use of the Nutella brand.

Key names at Borovyk & Partners include Alexander Zhikarev, Bogdan Borovyk, Olena Kyrylyuk and the ‘deeply knowledgeable’ Petro Borovyk.

At Dentons, Adam Mycyk and associate Oksana Horban advised Bojer Innovativ Ingeniør Rådgivning on IP and IT licences in Ukraine.

At Eterna Law, ‘sharp’ IP head Ilarion Tomarov and Oleh Malskyy advised Wefuture on registering its international trade mark.

Gorodissky & Partners’ Nina Moshynska is ‘helpful and efficient’ and Maksym Kravchenko is a ‘great authority on IP’. Clients include Disney Enterprises.

Boutique IP practice Juscutum Attorneys Association handles disputes and IP management, and is involved in drafting laws on internet copyright protection. Managing partner Artem Afian is the key name.

Legal Alliance Company’s Natalia Lavrenova advised USAID on an international software rights development and transfer project. Illya Kostin is also noted.

Marchenko Danevych excels in life sciences matters. Borys Danevych is ‘highly effective’ and Oleksandr Aleksyeyenko joined from Integrites. Clients include Novo Nordisk.

Oleksandr Peremezhko & Partners successfully defended Halla in a trade name dispute. Oleksandr Peremezhko is ‘a brilliant negotiator and litigator’ and Volodymyr Smelik is ‘an outstanding IP lawyer’.

Synergy IP Law Agency’s ‘advice exceeds expectations’. Viktoriia Ostapchuk, Alina Seroshtan and ‘extremely erudite litigator and trouble-shooter’ Anna Kravchuk are the key names.

Dmytro Gadomsky is the primary figure at Axon Partners, which ‘provides high-quality service for a fair price’. The firm advised ProZorro on IP rights transfer matters.

Highlights for CMS included defending mBank in a trade mark dispute with Bank Mykhailivsky. Litigators Olexander Martinenko and Maria Orlyk lead the team

Gramatskiy&PartnersAndriy Trembich advised Global Universal Trading on a $10m IP rights transfer. Mykola Voytovich is also noted.

At Integrites, Daniyil Fedorchuk and Serhiy Shershun are the key names. Oleksandr Aleksyeyenko joined Marchenko Danevych.

Jurimex Legal Solutions assisted IQ Production with IP matters arising from television film production. Yuriy Krayniak and Oksana Yefimchuk lead the team.

NOBLES’ clients include Oracle and Foodpanda. The team advised the latter on an IP rights transfer to its parent company. Volodymyr Yakubovskyy and Tatiana Iurkovska are the names to note.

At SDM Partners LLC, Serhiy Dzis advised a brick producer on the $3m acquisition and registration of IP rights.

Vasil Kisil & Partners advised an IT development company on securing rights for its software. Vladyslav Podolyak is the key name.

Wolf Theiss’ Olena Vardamatska advised William Hill on software licensing and regulatory law matters following its acquisition of a stake in NeoGames.

Interview with...

Law firm partners and practice heads explain how their firms are adapting to clients' changing needs

International comparative guides

Giving the in-house community greater insight to the law and regulations in different jurisdictions.

Select Practice Area

GC Powerlist -

Press releases

The latest news direct from law firms. If you would like to submit press releases for your firm, send an email request to

Legal Developments in Ukraine

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • A Remarkable Year of Restructuring. What Next?

    What happened in 2015 in the world of Ukrainian corporate finance was a reflection of larger scale events in and around Ukraine. In this article, we will share our view of the key events in 2015 in the area of cor-porate finance, highlight the most important legislative and regulatory developments in finance and, based on our experience, make a few suggestions for creditors and debtors on how to navigate through 2016.
  • Enforcement in Ukraine of Interim Orders Issued by Foreign Courts and Arbitral Tribunals

    In the past few years Ukrainian clients have developed an appetite for solving their disputes abroad. Litigation and arbitration sagas involving Ukrainian parties or related to Ukrainian assets often spread across many jurisdictions. In many such sagas various interim reliefs were granted by courts and tribunals.
  • Applicable law in contractual disputes: recent arbitration practice

    AstapovLawyers Partner Eugene Blinov & the firm's Associate Roman Protsyshyn share their recent arbitration practice regarding applicable law in contractual disputes.
  • Disputes arising from finance arrangements: post-crisis phenomenon in Ukraine – read more!

    The 2008 financial crisis peak had hardly faded away, when another breaking news was brought to the surface in CIS countries: a significant part of the funds advanced during the pre-crisis period by banks and other financial institutions to support various businesses and commercial initiatives, flew beyond national frontiers to be found in Panama, BVI, Seychelles, Jersey, Cyprus and other offshore and onshore jurisdictions in the pockets of numerous private persons, mostly CIS nationals. No surprise this fact led to a tsunami of disputes, one way or the other related to repayment of loans and funds advanced under other types of finance arrangements. Many of those disputes are still pending, thus, keeping finance arrangements among the top-litigated issues within CIS borders.
  • Proper notices in arbitration – watch the details!

    Article V1(b) of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, better known as the New York Convention, provides that recognition and enforcement of a foreign arbitral award may be refused, at the request of the party against which it is invoked, only if that party furnishes proof to the competent authority where the recognition and enforcement is sought that it was not given proper notice of the appointment of the arbitrator or of the arbitration proceedings. However simple at first glance, the question of what constitutes 'proper notice' turns out to be less than clear in practice.
  • Is the Door to England Still That Wide Open for CIS Disputes?

    6 February has marked lawyers’ calendars with an important message from the UK Supreme Court: English courts will not accept the jurisdiction over a dispute having the “centre of gravity” in another country. AstapovLawyers' Managing Partner Andrey Astapov and Associate Anna Kombikova comment on a recent CIS precedent.
  • Time limit for forwarding arbitral award to parties extended

    The Presidium of the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (UCCI) recently amended Article 52 of the Rules of the International Commercial Arbitration Court (ICAC) at the UCCI. This article governs the procedure for forwarding an arbitral award to the parties to arbitration proceedings.
  • Enforcing arbitral awards against Ukrainian bankrupt companies

    Eugene Blinov and Anna Kombikova of AstapovLawyers ILG commented on peculiarities of enforcement of arbitral awards against Ukrainian bankrupt companies. The lawyers noted the risks connected with such cases and suggested possible solutions.
  • Mitigation of damages in arbitration practice: trite law or space for creativity?

    The mitigation of damages is a well-known principle in international legal practice. However, in Ukraine there is no widely applied court and arbitration practice on the issues relating to mitigation of damages, and aggrieved parties may be unclear as to what should and can be done.
  • Ukraine enables itself to furnish procedural orders of foreign judicial and arbitral authorities

    The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine at its meeting on August 29 resolved [1] to amend its Resolution "On approval of the Order for the use of funds allocated in the state budget for payments related to implementation of judgments of foreign jurisdictional authorities rendered upon consideration of matters against Ukraine" (the "Government Resolution").[2] Appropriate amendments were prepared by the Ministry of Justice (responsible for protecting the state's interests in foreign courts and arbitral tribunals) in order to improve mechanisms to protect the rights and interests of Ukraine in foreign judicial and arbitral proceedings.

Press Releases in Ukraine

The latest news direct from law firms. If you would like to submit press releases for your firm, send an email request to