The real estate dispute resolution practice at DMH Stallard LLP stands out for its ‘knowledgeable, proactive’ advice. The team is headed up by the ’experienced, efficient’ Emily Wood, who acts for property investors, local authorities, commercial tenants, and private landlords on complex breach of covenant, vacant possession, and business rates claims. James Picknell represents major commercial landlords and tenants in covenant disputes, navigating lease exit strategies, and dilapidation claims. Further experts include Tina George, a specialist in lease extensions and enfranchisement; Graham Halsall, who acts for commercial developers and local authorities on land disputes concerning access issues and recovering possession; and Cheraine Williams, who focuses her practice on landlord and tenant issues including dilapidations, lease renewals, and vacant possession issues.
Legal 500 Editorial commentary
Phone
01483 467463
Email
Profile
Social

Profile

Work Department
Real Estate Dispute Resolution
Position

Partner

Career

James has specialised in advising clients on property dispute matters since 2003, gaining significant experience in the areas of commercial landlord and tenant and land disputes.

James represents commercial landlords and tenants in respect of a broad range of matters, such as opposed and unopposed commercial lease renewals, insolvency, assignment and subletting, forfeiture, rent arrears, and service charge disputes.  James has significant experience dealing with complex dilapidations claims, break clauses and lease exit strategies.

For many years, a consistently large part of James’ caseload has included advising on private client and commercial land issues, such as access disputes, restrictive covenants and nuisance claims.  James also has considerable experience advising clients on boundary disputes and adverse possession claims.

James works primarily in our Guildford office but also collaborates closely with colleagues in our other locations.

Work highlights:

  • Representing an international firm in its defence of a substantial dilapidations claim of high end commercial office premises in the City.
  • Representing a developer in High Court proceedings concerning attempts by a commercial neighbour to prevent the client and future owners from gaining access to a residential development.
  • Acting for a group of neighbours who were parties to proceedings in the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) and the High Court in respect of their objection to a developer’s claims for the modification of restrictive covenants and a declaration of the Court.
  • Advising and providing strategic advice to well known high street retailers in respect of asset management issues such as 1954 Act renewals, break clauses and dilapidations disputes.
Languages
English

Content supplied by DMH Stallard LLP

Testimonials

Collated independently by Legal 500 research team.

  • ‘Legally very competent but also very strategically aware.’

  • ‘Really strong team and very adaptable.’

  • ‘Extremely knowledgeable, good communicators and very professional. The advice we receive is always first class.’

  • ‘Knowledgeable, proactive team.’

  • ‘Great expertise and knowledge.’

  • ‘Very quick to respond and very helpful.’

Key clients

  • Crawley Borough Council
  • Wealden & Rother District Council
  • Cats Protection Trustees Limited
  • St Catherine’s Hospice Limited
  • Dorrington PLC
  • Cadogan Estates Limited
  • Newhaven Port and Properties Limited
  • University of Brighton
  • Liverpool & Victoria
  • Horsham District Council

Work highlights

Advising the Dervia Foundation on its significant portfolio of commercial and residential properties in Sussex, including commercial lease renewals, advice on dilapidations, residential possession recovery, and redevelopment projects
Acting for Roffey Homes Limited on a range of property matters including voluntary and statutory lease extensions, service charge issues, and contentious property matters
Acting for a consortium of energy supplies in test case appeals to the Valuation Tribunal against the Valuation Office challenging the current methodology of rating in green energy.