Matrix Chambers has a breadth of public international law experience and expertise, spanning from territorial disputes between states, arbitration award enforcement, and the provision of advisory opinions in major international courts and tribunals. A ‘compelling advocate and creative legal thinker’, Edward Craven KC took silk in 2025, and has ongoing involvement acting for Guyana in provisional measures before the ICJ concerning Venezuela’s attempts to claim sovereignty over (and threats to invade) the Essequibo region – over two-thirds of the country’s territory and with significant energy resources – citing allegations of corruption in a 1899 arbitral award.
Legal 500 Editorial commentary
- Profile
Profile
Position
Specialist in public international law; international human rights law; international environmental law; public law; commercial law; sport law; privacy, defamation and data protection; and money laundering and proceeds of crime.
Notable cases include Somalia v Kenya (representing Somalia in a maritime delimitation dispute before the International Court of Justice), Croatia v Serbia (representing Croatia in proceedings under the Genocide Convention before the ICJ); Guyana v Venezuela (representing Guyana in proceedings before the ICJ concerning the validity of an 1899 arbitral ward); Lungowe v Vedanta Resources PLC (Supreme Court appeal concerning liability of UK parent company for polluting activities of foreign subsidiary); Elgizouli v Home Secretary (Supreme Court appeal regarding UK’s facilitation of the death penalty); Smith v Ministry of Defence (Supreme Court appeal concerning extra-territorial application of international human rights treaty); Belhaj v Straw (Supreme Court appeal concerning state immunity and foreign act of state doctrines); Rahmatullah and Serdar Mohammed v Secretary of State for Defence (Supreme Court appeal concerning crown act of state doctrine); SXH v Crown Prosecution Service (Supreme Court appeal concerning application of Article 8 ECHR to prosecution of vulnerable refugees); OPO v MLA (Supreme Court appeal concerning worldwide ban on publication of a performing artist’s autobiography); Lachaux v Lachaux (Supreme Court appeal regarding meaning of ‘serious harm’ in Defamation Act 2013); Bashir v Home Secretary (Supreme Court appeal regarding application of international treaty to UK sovereign base areas in Cyprus); Lloyd v Google (Supreme Court appeal concerning attempt to establish representative action on behalf of several million iPhone users); Gubarev v Christopher Steele (libel claim concerning publication of confidential intelligence memorandum); Okpabi v Royal Dutch Shell (Supreme Court appeal concerning claims against UK and Nigerian mining companies concerning extensive oil spills in Niger Delta); Abu Zubaydah v FCDO (Supreme Court appeal concerning applicable law in claims concerning facilitation of torture by CIA); Independent Inquiry Relating to Afghanistan (lead counsel for Bereaved Families who allege their relatives were unlawfully killed by UK Special Forces); Donald Trump v Orbis Business Intelligence Limited (successfully defending data protection claim brought by President Trump).
Career
Called 2007, Lincoln’s Inn; Ad hoc clerk at Court of Arbitration for Sport (2014 – present); Trial observer, International Bar Association Human Rights Institute (2013 – 2015); Judicial assistant, UK Supreme Court (2011 – 2012); Lecturer in administrative law, Balliol College, Oxford University (2010); Stagiaire, European Court of Human Rights (2010); Judicial assistant, Court of Appeal (2009). Publications of note: Human Rights and Criminal Justice (Sweet & Maxwell, 3rd Ed.) (contributing editor); Smith, Bodnar and Owen on Asset Recovery, Criminal Confiscation and Civil Recovery (OUP, 2nd Ed.) (contributor); Montgomery and Ormerod on Fraud: Criminal Law and Procedure (contributor); Prison Law (OUP, 3rd Ed.) (contributing editor).
Education
Trinity Hall, Cambridge University (BA Law – First Class); Inns of Court School of Law (Bar Vocational Course – Outstanding); Brasenose College, Oxford University (Bachelor of Civil Law – Distinction).
Content supplied by Matrix Chambers
Testimonials
Collated independently by Legal 500 research team.
- 'Clerks are good, especially Paul Venables.'
- 'Matrix is a progressive and well-regarded set in international law.'
- 'Very deep bench and well-administered.'