Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 APRIL 2026

Risk #3: Five Considerations For Advisers Implementing AI In Investment Decisions

Proskauer Rose LLP
Proskauer Rose LLP
Contributor
Proskauer Rose LLP

Proskauer Rose LLP

Firm Overview Proskauer is an elite global law firm with more than 900 lawyers across key financial...

View firm profile
Explore more from Proskauer Rose LLP

Use of technology referred to as "artificial intelligence" is fast finding its way into many aspects of commercial life. Registered investment advisers are no exception as AI tools are already being used...

United StatesTechnology

Use of technology referred to as "artificial intelligence" is fast finding its way into many aspects of commercial life. Registered investment advisers are no exception as AI tools are already being used for screening and research, portfolio construction, trading and drafting client communications. As advisers integrate these tools into their investment processes, they face a familiar set of questions under the federal securities laws.

Though the SEC's "predictive data analytics" (or "PDA") proposal, which focused on the use of AI through the lens of conflicts of interest has now been withdrawn, this does not signal a retreat from AI as a supervisory priority. Going forward, the SEC seems likely instead to evaluate use of AI through the lens of an adviser's fiduciary duty of care, as opposed to the conflicts-focused PDA rule centering on an adviser's duty of loyalty. That is, instead of scrubbing through an AI tool's inputs to evaluate whether it could potentially

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from