Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 JULY 2023

Not Today, Gary: Court Says XRP Is Not A Security

Lowenstein Sandler LLP
Lowenstein Sandler LLP
Contributor
Lowenstein Sandler LLP

Lowenstein Sandler LLP

Lowenstein Sandler LLP is a national law firm with over 400 lawyers based in New York, Palo Alto,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Lowenstein Sandler LLP

On July 13, Judge Analisa Torres, district judge for the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, issued a substantial order (the Order) on cross motions for summary judgment...

United StatesTechnology

On July 13, Judge Analisa Torres, district judge for the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, issued a substantial order (the Order) on cross motions for summary judgment in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ripple Labs case (SEC v. Ripple), which breathed new life into the cryptocurrency ecosystem.

Buried within the legal and procedural language of the Order, Torres declared that "XRP, as a digital token, is not in and of itself a 'contract, transaction, or scheme' that embodies the Howey requirements of an investment contract." Translation–XRP is not a security.

While the Order addressed a number of issues, the key takeaway is that a digital asset like XRP may be a commodity on its own, especially when traded on centralized or decentralized exchanges. However, the same digital asset may be deemed a security depending on how and to whom it is sold or distributed.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from