Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 NOVEMBER 2017

Tax Talk: Volume 10, Issue 3

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

Tax Reform (or whatever you want to call it) is in full swing as this edition of Tax Talk goes to press.

United StatesTax

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: DISTRICT COURT HOLDS ANTI-INVERSION REGULATION INVALID ON PROCEDURAL GROUNDS

On October 16, 2017, a United States District Court in Texas invalidated temporary Treasury Regulations that target so-called "serial inverters" (i.e., foreign acquiring corporations that have acquired domestic corporations in the past) (the "Serial Inversion Rule"). The plaintiffs argued that the Serial Inversion Rule violated the Administrative Procedures Act (the "APA") because the Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") lacked statutory authority to issue the Serial Inversion Rule, the Serial Inversion Rule was arbitrary and capricious, and the IRS failed to provide adequate notice and opportunity for comment. The court ultimately invalidated the Serial Inversion Rule on the basis that the IRS failed to provide adequate notice and opportunity for comment as required by the APA.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from