Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 OCTOBER 2010

T&E Litigation Update: "Cushman v. Folan"

In "Cushman v. Folan", Case No. 09-P-894, 2010 Mass. App. Unpub. LEXIS 1135 (Oct. 19, 2010), a decision issued pursuant to Rule 1:28, the Appeals Court addressed the procedural question of whether an appeal of a fees award in probate court was properly dismissed with respect to one of the appellants ("Cushman") for her failure to post a bond to secure the judgment, as ordered by the probate court.

United StatesTax

In Cushman v. Folan, Case No. 09-P-894, 2010 Mass. App. Unpub. LEXIS 1135 (Oct. 19, 2010), a decision issued pursuant to Rule 1:28, the Appeals Court addressed the procedural question of whether an appeal of a fees award in probate court was properly dismissed with respect to one of the appellants ("Cushman") for her failure to post a bond to secure the judgment, as ordered by the probate court. The more interesting aspect of this case from our perspective, however, relates to the fees award itself.

Cushman was one of a number of objectors/plaintiffs in a will contest that was consolidated with a related equity action. Although Cushman filed a motion for voluntary dismissal of her objections and for leave to withdraw on the day that trial began, and although the probate court allowed Cushman to withdraw, the court noted that Cushman might nevertheless be held liable for any fees that were later awarded. The remaining plaintiffs proceeded through trial and judgment

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from