Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 APRIL 2015

Retroactivity Revisited: Has Anything Changed?

The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Carlton turned 20 last year, but the core issue within the case remains embattled.

United StatesTax

Article by Erica L. Horn, Madonna E. Schueler and Gregory A. Nowak*

The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Carlton turned 20 last year, but the core issue within the case remains embattled. In this article, authors Erica Horn, Madonna Schueler and Gregory Nowak discuss the Carlton decision and several 2014 cases on which it had an impact.

Introduction

Last year marked the twentieth anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Carlton,1 but the battle continues over the constitutionality of retroactive tax legislation. Taxpayers continue to fight state efforts to amend tax legislation retroactively based on the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which provides that no state shall deprive any person of ''life, liberty, or property without due process of law.''2 States have fought back with equal zeal, and the results have been anything but uniform. This article revisits the Court's decision in Carlton and the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from