While the equitable remedy of veil piercing "seems to
happen freakishly, like lightning, it is rare, severe and
unprincipled"1; it seems that courts are finding
that its limitations and principles as developed in the context of
the corporation are applicable in the context of LLCs. For example,
in Kubican v. The Tavern, LLC, the West Virginia Supreme
Court wrote: "Accordingly, we hold that W. Va. Code
§31B-3-303 permits the equitable remedy of piercing the veil
to be asserted against a West Virginia Limited Liability
Company."2 This also appears to be the case in
Delaware.3 As observed in Bowen v. 707 On Main,
"The principle of piercing the corporate veil ... also is
applicable to limited liability companies and their
members."4 Still, courts are struggling with
certain aspects of the application of piercing doctrine to LLCs,
especially the question of "compliance with [corporate]
formalities."5 Another feature that is making an
appearance in favor of piercing is the