Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 JULY 2016

Mr. Irresistible Force, Meet Ms. Immovable Object

A compelling benefit for institutional investors investing in improved real estate is the potential for recognizing taxable losses in excess of the amount invested.

United StatesReal Estate and Construction

In the acquisition and financing of income-producing property, there are usually three parties at the table:  the sponsor (often a local entrepreneur who has located and will manage and lease the building), the equity investor (often an institution, such as a life company, real estate fund or REIT) and the lender.

In closing the equity and debt, the sponsor functions as a tiny fulcrum balancing a teeter totter board with an elephant on one end and a hippo on the other, neither of whom wants to stay balanced with the other.  As if the fulcrum’s job wasn’t already hard, a recent Memorandum from the Office of Chief Counsel of the IRS potentially up-ends one of the traditional risk allocation and tax benefit analyses that makes real estate investments appealing to equity investors in the first place.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from