Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 JANUARY 2013

Construction Claims: Trust Funds Can Go Poof

A typical trust fund statute provides that payments to a construction contractor are treated as funds held in trust until its subcontractors and suppliers have been paid.

United StatesReal Estate and Construction

McDonald v. Little Limestone, Inc. (In re Powers Lake Construction Co.), 482 B.R. 803 (Bankr. E.D. Wis. 2012) –

A typical trust fund statute provides that payments to a construction contractor are treated as funds held in trust until its subcontractors and suppliers have been paid.In the case of a contractor bankruptcy this can be a significant benefit, since the subcontractors and suppliers can argue that the trust funds should be turned over for payment since they are not even part of the bankruptcy estate since.However, sometimes the value of this protection can be illusory, as a material supplier discovered in this casewhile trying to defend against a preference
claim.

In Powers Lake, the prime contractor (C.D. Smith Construction, Inc.) hired the debtor (Powers Lake Construction Company, Inc.), which in turn had a contract with material supplier (Little Limestone, Inc.) to supply limestone, for a wastewater treatment plant project.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from