Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 MARCH 2015

$22.5 Million Victory

Fox Rothschild LLP
Fox Rothschild LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Fox Rothschild LLP

You may recall a prior blog post regarding a case where we proved a "de facto" taking of a property.

United StatesReal Estate and Construction

You may recall a prior blog post regarding a case where we proved a "de facto" taking of a property.  A "de facto" condemnation – sometimes known as an "inverse condemnation" – occurs when a condemnor's actions cause the equivalent of a taking before a declaration of taking is filed.  Our client was in the process of developing a property for residential condominiums.  PennDOT did not initiate a condemnation action until May, 2009.  We established that PennDOT's actions caused a taking in December 2006.  As a result, the property will now be valued as of December 2006 and not May 2009.

We recently tried the damages part of the case before a "Board of View."  PennDOT alleged the value of the condemned property was $6.75 million.  We presented evidence that the value was $25 million.  The Board entered an award of $22.5 million.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from