Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 JULY 2016

Will GOP Endorsement Of ‘Hack Back' Make Cyberspace Safe Again?

A sophisticated hacker can cloak the origination point of an attack, making it hard to hit the actual attacker.

United StatesPrivacy

​Amidst the balloons and excitement (and smoke machines and procedural kerfuffles) at the GOP Convention in Cleveland, one provision in the party platform has caught the eye of cyber experts. For the first time, an American political party has explicitly extended the concept of self-defense to cyberspace, stating that "users have a self-defense right to deal with hackers as they see fit."

Experts have long been divided on the wisdom of encouraging reprisals by cyber-attack victims against attackers – so-called "hack backs." One reason is that attribution is exceptionally difficult. A sophisticated hacker can cloak the origination point of an attack, making it hard to hit the actual attacker. Moreover, since legitimate technical systems are rarely designed for offensive purposes, hack-back measures can cause more problems than the original hack.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from