Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 APRIL 2012

New Case Highlights Split Of Authority Interpreting The Computer Fraud And Abuse Act

Below is a cross-post with the Security, Privacy and the Law blog.

United StatesPrivacy

Below is a cross-post with the Security, Privacy and the Law blog.

Employers increasingly are suing former employees who have left to join or form competing companies using the civil remedies available under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act ("CFAA"), 18 U.S.C. § 1030. They use the CFAA to prevent their former employees from using sensitive information obtained from the former employer's computer system. The scope of the CFAA, however, is subject to hot debate among the federal courts, as highlighted by a recent case from the District of Minnesota.

In Walsh Bishop Associates, Inc. v. O'Brien, Civil Action No. 11-2673 (DSD/AJB), 2012 WL 669069 (D. Minn. Feb. 28, 2012), the court interpreted a provision of the CFAA, 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(2)(C), which subjects an individual who "intentionally accesses a computer without authorization or exceeds authorized access, and thereby obtains information from any protected computer" to civil liability should the plaintiff meet

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from