Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 MARCH 2021

DSARs: Are The Courts Flexing Their Muscles (Again)?

Ann Bevitt, partner with Cooley, considers how organizations should navigate the wider approach to refusing DSARs applied by the High Court in a recent case.

United StatesPrivacy

In the 2020 UK case of Lees v Lloyds Bank plc EWHC 2249 (Ch) (24th August 2020), the High Court dismissed a claim against Lloyds Bank for alleged failures to provide adequate responses to Mr Lees' data subject access requests ('DSARs') in breach of the Data Protec tion Act 2018 ('DPA 2018') and the GDPR. Having decided that Lloyds Bank had adequately responded to the DSARs, the High Court discussed its discretion to refuse an order compelling compliance where a claimant demonstrates that a defendant has not responded to a DSAR in accordance with the relevant legislation. Although this section of the Court's judgment was 'obiter dicta', and therefore persuasive rather than binding on other courts, it is helpful in understanding the likely approach UK courts will take when faced with such applications.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from