Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 JANUARY 2024

When A ​"Sponsored" Disclosure May Not Be Enough

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Contributor
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

About Kelley Drye We’re focused—in key areas of the law and on the nuances of each matter—to help...

View firm profile
Explore more from Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

NAD recently reviewed posts promoting Cariuma sneakers that appeared on the Facebook and Instagram accounts of Travel + Leisure, US Weekly, and The Quality Edit.

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

NAD recently reviewed posts promoting Cariuma sneakers that appeared on the Facebook and Instagram accounts of Travel + Leisure, US Weekly, and The Quality Edit. The posts claimed that various celebrities wore the sneakers, encouraged consumers to buy the sneakers before they sold out, and included links to make a purchase or learn more. Each post was labeled as "sponsored."

NAD assessed whether the posts were ads or editorial content and concluded that they fell into the former category. If you want to learn more about how NAD came to that conclusion, you can read the decision. In this post, we're going to focus on the "sponsored" label. Although advertisers have long thought that to be a "safe" option for a disclosure, this decisions demonstrates that's not always the case.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from