Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 JANUARY 2019

The FTC's "Reasonable Basis" Standard Has Evolved For Disease Efficacy Claims

Davis+Gilbert LLP
Davis+Gilbert LLP
Contributor
Davis+Gilbert LLP

Davis+Gilbert LLP

Legal mastery is critical but not enough. Even the best legal strategies must work in tandem with...

View firm profile
Explore more from Davis+Gilbert LLP

Decades ago, in an action the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) brought against Pfizer, Inc., the FTC identified several factors to weigh in determining the appropriate level of substantiation an advertiser must have for objective advertising claims.

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

Decades ago, in an action the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) brought against Pfizer, Inc., the FTC identified several factors to weigh in determining the appropriate level of substantiation an advertiser must have for objective advertising claims. Over the years, the standard has changed, and various proceedings brought by the FTC in 2018 suggest the steps that advertisers should take in 2019 when claiming that their products treat disease.

The Evolution
In the Pfizer matter, the FTC challenged the company's "numerous statements and representations respecting the pain relieving properties" of a product it offered for persons suffering from sunburn. The FTC declared that Pfizer's statements or representations that its product actually would anesthetize nerves in sensitive sunburned skin or that it was otherwise effective required prior support before making the claim.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from