Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 DECEMBER 2025

TCPA Tracker: September-October 2025

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Contributor
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

About Kelley Drye We’re focused—in key areas of the law and on the nuances of each matter—to help...

View firm profile
Explore more from Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

The United States District Court for the Central District of California denied class certification for Plaintiff's proposed Do-Not-Call class, finding that Plaintiff's circumstantial evidence...

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

I. Central District of California Denies Class Certification Over Clickwrap Consent

The United States District Court for the Central District of California denied class certification for Plaintiff's proposed Do-Not-Call class, finding that Plaintiff's circumstantial evidence regarding lack of consent failed to satisfy Rule 23(a)'s typicality requirement.

Plaintiff Paul Sapan alleged that he received seven unsolicited telephone calls on his residential phone from five individuals soliciting him to refinance his mortgage on behalf of Defendant, The Federal Savings Bank, in violation of 47 U.S.C. § 227 et seq. and 47 C.F.R. § 64.1200(c)(2). He sought certification of a nationwide class of residential subscribers on the National Do-Not-Call Registry who allegedly received two or more telemarketing calls from Defendant or its agents without prior express written consent.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from