Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 NOVEMBER 2025

TCPA Caller Identification Defenses

On July 16, 2025, the United District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania issued a noteworthy decision in Newell v. JR Capital, LLC. Among other claims...

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

On July 16, 2025, the United District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania issued a noteworthy decision in Newell v. JR Capital, LLC. Among other claims, Plaintiff alleged that Defendant violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA") by sending her over five text messages that did not contain caller identification information. Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss arguing, among other things, that the TCPA's caller identification information provisions do not apply to text messages.

Newell is noteworthy because Defendant attempted to utilize a relatively unexplored argument to defeat Plaintiff's TCPA caller identification claims. Although the Court ultimately denied Defendant's Motion to Dismiss in this case, TCPA defendants should continue to explore previously unviable defenses in the wake of McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corporation.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from