Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 MAY 2019

Sandy Hook Massacre Gun Makers Must Face Claims Under State UDAP Statute

Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC
Contributor
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC

Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC

Founded more than 40 years ago as a boutique law firm servicing the entertainment and arts...

View firm profile
Explore more from Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC

That is to say, if these plaintiffs cannot test the legality of the defendants' advertisements…then no one can.

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

In March, The Connecticut Supreme Court issued a ruling in Soto v. Bushmaster Firearms International, et al. allowing private litigants' claims against the firearms makers brought under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practice Act ("CUPTA"), the state's mini FTC Act, to proceed. 

Plaintiffs, the administrators of the estates of several victims of the mass shooting, alleged that advertising and marketing by the defendants was "unethical, oppressive, immoral and unscrupulous" within the meaning of CUTPA, and that this advertising and marketing promoted the illegal offensive use of the gun used in the killings. Specifically, plaintiffs alleged that the defendants sought to grow the market for their guns by extolling the militaristic and assaultive qualities of their AR-15 rifles and, specifically, the weapon's suitability for offensive combat missions.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

www.fkks.com

This post first appeared in Frankfurt Kurnit's Focus on the Data blog (www.focusonthedata.com). It provides general coverage of its subject area. We provide it with the understanding that Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz is not engaged herein in rendering legal advice, and shall not be liable for any damages resulting from any error, inaccuracy, or omission. Our attorneys practice law only in jurisdictions in which they are properly authorized to do so. We do not seek to represent clients in other jurisdictions.

Originally published by the New York Legal Ethics Reporter

www.fkks.com

This alert provides general coverage of its subject area. We provide it with the understanding that Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz is not engaged herein in rendering legal advice, and shall not be liable for any damages resulting from any error, inaccuracy, or omission. Our attorneys practice law only in jurisdictions in which they are properly authorized to do so. We do not seek to represent clients in other jurisdictions.

www.fkks.com

This alert provides general coverage of its subject area. We provide it with the understanding that Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz is not engaged herein in rendering legal advice, and shall not be liable for any damages resulting from any error, inaccuracy, or omission. Our attorneys practice law only in jurisdictions in which they are properly authorized to do so. We do not seek to represent clients in other jurisdictions.

See more popular content from