Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 DECEMBER 2012

Public Art Programs: 1% For The 99% - Part Three

Sheppard
Sheppard
Contributor
Sheppard

Sheppard

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more...

View firm profile
Explore more from Sheppard

We conclude our series on public art and percent-for-art programs by focusing on a recent case involving the respected American sculptor, Alice Aycock.

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

We conclude our series on public art and percent-for-art programs by focusing on a recent case involving the respected American sculptor, Alice Aycock. The artist's sculpture, Star Sifter, was created in 1998 for the John F. Kennedy Airport, New York City. The recent lawsuit was prompted by the planned removal, and thereby destruction, of the commissioned work of art.

Aycock filed a complaint for injunctive relief in aid of arbitration against the Terminal One Group Association (TOGA), which is responsible for management at JFK Airport Terminal One, in order to enjoin the defendants from breaching the contract with her and from violating her rights under VARA (the Visual Artists Rights Act). When the case went to court in Manhattan in April 2012, federal judge Robert W. Sweet issued a temporary restraining order blocking TOGA from starting to dismantle the sculpture. It was further decided in May that the case would go to arbitration, as specified in the contract

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from